WoRMS taxon details
Endectyon (Endectyon) fruticosum (Dendy, 1887)
168031 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:168031)
accepted
Species
Endectyon fruticosum (Dendy, 1887)· accepted, alternate representation
Raspailia fruticosa Dendy, 1887 (genus transfer)
Raspailia fruticosum Dendy, 1887 (genus transfer)
Variety Endectyon (Endectyon) fruticosum var. aruense (Hentschel, 1912)
Variety Endectyon (Endectyon) fruticosum var. tenuiramosum (Dendy, 1905)
Variety Endectyon (Endectyon) fruticosum var. tenuiramosum (Dendy, 1905)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
Dendy, A. (1887). The Sponge-fauna of Madras. A Report on a Collection of Sponges obtained in the Neighbourhood of Madras by Edgar Thurston, Esq. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. (5) 20(117):153-165, pls IX-XII. [details]

Type locality contained in Eastern India
type locality contained in Eastern India [details]
Status The two varieties named by Dendy (1905) and Hentschel (1912) are apparently different from the (unnamed ) typical variety....
Status The two varieties named by Dendy (1905) and Hentschel (1912) are apparently different from the (unnamed ) typical variety. However, the varieties are probably merely different in growth form, not in other features. The ICZN does not consider varieties to be valid taxa, so it has to be decided whether Dendy's (1905) and Hentschel's varieties need to be distinguished as separate taxa. [details]
Van Soest, R.W.M; Boury-Esnault, N.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Rützler, K.; de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Hajdu, E.; Pisera, A.B.; Manconi, R.; Schönberg, C.; Klautau, M.; Picton, B.; Kelly, M.; Vacelet, J.; Dohrmann, M.; Díaz, M.-C.; Cárdenas, P.; Carballo, J. L.; Ríos, P.; Downey, R. (2018). World Porifera database. Endectyon (Endectyon) fruticosum (Dendy, 1887). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=168031 on 2018-04-19
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Dendy, A. (1887). The Sponge-fauna of Madras. A Report on a Collection of Sponges obtained in the Neighbourhood of Madras by Edgar Thurston, Esq. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. (5) 20(117):153-165, pls IX-XII. [details]
original description (ofEndectyon fruticosum (Dendy, 1887)) Dendy, A. (1887). The Sponge-fauna of Madras. A Report on a Collection of Sponges obtained in the Neighbourhood of Madras by Edgar Thurston, Esq. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. (5) 20(117):153-165, pls IX-XII. [details]
original description (ofRaspailia fruticosum Dendy, 1887) Dendy, A. (1887). The Sponge-fauna of Madras. A Report on a Collection of Sponges obtained in the Neighbourhood of Madras by Edgar Thurston, Esq. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. (5) 20(117):153-165, pls IX-XII. [details]
basis of record (ofRaspailia fruticosa Dendy, 1887) Dendy, A. (1887). The Sponge-fauna of Madras. A Report on a Collection of Sponges obtained in the Neighbourhood of Madras by Edgar Thurston, Esq. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. (5) 20(117):153-165, pls IX-XII.
page(s): 160 [details]

original description (ofEndectyon fruticosum (Dendy, 1887)) Dendy, A. (1887). The Sponge-fauna of Madras. A Report on a Collection of Sponges obtained in the Neighbourhood of Madras by Edgar Thurston, Esq. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. (5) 20(117):153-165, pls IX-XII. [details]

original description (ofRaspailia fruticosum Dendy, 1887) Dendy, A. (1887). The Sponge-fauna of Madras. A Report on a Collection of Sponges obtained in the Neighbourhood of Madras by Edgar Thurston, Esq. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. (5) 20(117):153-165, pls IX-XII. [details]

basis of record (ofRaspailia fruticosa Dendy, 1887) Dendy, A. (1887). The Sponge-fauna of Madras. A Report on a Collection of Sponges obtained in the Neighbourhood of Madras by Edgar Thurston, Esq. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. (5) 20(117):153-165, pls IX-XII.
page(s): 160 [details]




From editor or global species database
Status The two varieties named by Dendy (1905) and Hentschel (1912) are apparently different from the (unnamed ) typical variety. However, the varieties are probably merely different in growth form, not in other features. The ICZN does not consider varieties to be valid taxa, so it has to be decided whether Dendy's (1905) and Hentschel's varieties need to be distinguished as separate taxa. [details]