HABs source details

Hoppenrath, M.; Murray, S. A.; Chomérat, N.; Horiguchi, T. (2014). Marine benthic dinoflagellates - unravelling their worldwide biodiversity. Kleine Senckenberg-Reihe. 54: 1-276.
281669
Hoppenrath, M.; Murray, S. A.; Chomérat, N.; Horiguchi, T.
2014
Marine benthic dinoflagellates - unravelling their worldwide biodiversity
Kleine Senckenberg-Reihe
54: 1-276
Publication
Frankfurt am Main & Stuttgar: V. Mosbrugger & E. Schweizerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung
RIS (EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
BibTex (BibDesk, LaTeX)
Date
action
by
2017-08-11 06:46:24Z
created
De Visscher, Jill
2021-06-03 10:12:19Z
changed
db_admin

 Alexandrium hiranoi Kita & Fukuyo, 1988
  1. Functional group benthopelagic
  2. [Details]


 Alexandrium hiranoi Kita & Fukuyo, 1988
  1. Body size (qualitative) <0.2 mm
  2. [Details]


 Alexandrium hiranoi Kita & Fukuyo, 1988
  1. Body size 18
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Alexandrium hiranoi Kita & Fukuyo, 1988
  1. Body size 18
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Alexandrium hiranoi Kita & Fukuyo, 1988
  1. Body size 75
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Alexandrium hiranoi Kita & Fukuyo, 1988
  1. Body size 75
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Alexandrium hiranoi Kita & Fukuyo, 1988
  1. Functional group benthopelagic
  2. [Details]


 Alexandrium hiranoi Kita & Fukuyo, 1988
  1. Body size (qualitative) <0.2 mm
  2. [Details]


 Amphidinium carterae Hulburt, 1957
  1. Functional group microbenthos
  2. [Details]


 Amphidinium carterae Hulburt, 1957
  1. Body size 10
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Amphidinium carterae Hulburt, 1957
  1. Body size 13
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Amphidinium carterae Hulburt, 1957
  1. Body size 17
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Amphidinium carterae Hulburt, 1957
  1. Body size 6
  2. Unit µm
  3. Dimension Height
  4. [Details]


 Amphidinium carterae Hulburt, 1957
  1. Body size 7
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Amphidinium carterae Hulburt, 1957
  1. Body size (qualitative) <0.2 mm
  2. [Details]


 Amphidinium gibbosum (L.Maranda & Y.Shimizu) Flø Jørgensen & Shauna Murray, 2004
  1. Functional group microbenthos
  2. [Details]


 Amphidinium gibbosum (L.Maranda & Y.Shimizu) Flø Jørgensen & Shauna Murray, 2004
  1. Body size 17
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Amphidinium gibbosum (L.Maranda & Y.Shimizu) Flø Jørgensen & Shauna Murray, 2004
  1. Body size 23
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Amphidinium gibbosum (L.Maranda & Y.Shimizu) Flø Jørgensen & Shauna Murray, 2004
  1. Body size 24
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Amphidinium gibbosum (L.Maranda & Y.Shimizu) Flø Jørgensen & Shauna Murray, 2004
  1. Body size 43
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Amphidinium gibbosum (L.Maranda & Y.Shimizu) Flø Jørgensen & Shauna Murray, 2004
  1. Body size (qualitative) <0.2 mm
  2. [Details]


 Amphidinium massartii Biecheler, 1952
  1. Functional group microbenthos
  2. [Details]


 Amphidinium massartii Biecheler, 1952
  1. Functional group microplankton
  2. [Details]


 Amphidinium massartii Biecheler, 1952
  1. Body size 12
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Amphidinium massartii Biecheler, 1952
  1. Body size 17
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Amphidinium massartii Biecheler, 1952
  1. Body size 20
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Amphidinium massartii Biecheler, 1952
  1. Body size 7
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Amphidinium massartii Biecheler, 1952
  1. Body size (qualitative) <0.2 mm
  2. [Details]


 Coolia canariensis S.Fraga, 2008
  1. Body size 26
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Coolia canariensis S.Fraga, 2008
  1. Body size 27
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Coolia canariensis S.Fraga, 2008
  1. Body size 38
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Coolia canariensis S.Fraga, 2008
  1. Body size 40
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Coolia canariensis S.Fraga, 2008
  1. Functional group microbenthos
  2. [Details]


 Coolia canariensis S.Fraga, 2008
  1. Body size (qualitative) <0.2 mm
  2. [Details]


 Coolia tropicalis M.A.Faust, 1995
  1. Body size 23
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Coolia tropicalis M.A.Faust, 1995
  1. Body size 25
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Coolia tropicalis M.A.Faust, 1995
  1. Body size 39
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Coolia tropicalis M.A.Faust, 1995
  1. Body size 40
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Coolia tropicalis M.A.Faust, 1995
  1. Functional group microbenthos
  2. [Details]


 Coolia tropicalis M.A.Faust, 1995
  1. Body size (qualitative) <0.2 mm
  2. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus australes Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 33
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus australes Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 47
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus australes Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 55
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus australes Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 64
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus australes Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 74
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus australes Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 77
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus australes Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Functional group microbenthos
  2. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus australes Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size (qualitative) <0.2 mm
  2. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus belizeanus M.A.Faust, 1995
  1. Body size 55
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus belizeanus M.A.Faust, 1995
  1. Body size 61
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus belizeanus M.A.Faust, 1995
  1. Body size 61
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus belizeanus M.A.Faust, 1995
  1. Body size 65
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus belizeanus M.A.Faust, 1995
  1. Functional group microbenthos
  2. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus belizeanus M.A.Faust, 1995
  1. Body size (qualitative) <0.2 mm
  2. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus caribaeus Vandersea, Litaker, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 49
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus caribaeus Vandersea, Litaker, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 68
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus caribaeus Vandersea, Litaker, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 70
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus caribaeus Vandersea, Litaker, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 72
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus caribaeus Vandersea, Litaker, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 94
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus caribaeus Vandersea, Litaker, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 97
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus caribaeus Vandersea, Litaker, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Functional group microbenthos
  2. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus caribaeus Vandersea, Litaker, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size (qualitative) <0.2 mm
  2. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carolinianus Litaker, Vandersea, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 103
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carolinianus Litaker, Vandersea, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 42
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carolinianus Litaker, Vandersea, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 61
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carolinianus Litaker, Vandersea, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 72
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carolinianus Litaker, Vandersea, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 76
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carolinianus Litaker, Vandersea, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 87
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carolinianus Litaker, Vandersea, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Functional group microbenthos
  2. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carolinianus Litaker, Vandersea, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size (qualitative) <0.2 mm
  2. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carpenteri Kibler, Litaker, M.A.Faust, W.C.Holland, Vandersea & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 43
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carpenteri Kibler, Litaker, M.A.Faust, W.C.Holland, Vandersea & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 62
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carpenteri Kibler, Litaker, M.A.Faust, W.C.Holland, Vandersea & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 65
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carpenteri Kibler, Litaker, M.A.Faust, W.C.Holland, Vandersea & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 66
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carpenteri Kibler, Litaker, M.A.Faust, W.C.Holland, Vandersea & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 85
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carpenteri Kibler, Litaker, M.A.Faust, W.C.Holland, Vandersea & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size 92
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carpenteri Kibler, Litaker, M.A.Faust, W.C.Holland, Vandersea & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Functional group microbenthos
  2. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus carpenteri Kibler, Litaker, M.A.Faust, W.C.Holland, Vandersea & P.A.Tester, 2009
  1. Body size (qualitative) <0.2 mm
  2. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus excentricus S.Fraga, 2011
  1. Body size 110
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus excentricus S.Fraga, 2011
  1. Body size 115
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus excentricus S.Fraga, 2011
  1. Body size 34
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus excentricus S.Fraga, 2011
  1. Body size 41
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus excentricus S.Fraga, 2011
  1. Body size 69
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus excentricus S.Fraga, 2011
  1. Body size 84
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus excentricus S.Fraga, 2011
  1. Functional group microbenthos
  2. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus excentricus S.Fraga, 2011
  1. Body size (qualitative) <0.2 mm
  2. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus pacificus Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 33
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus pacificus Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 47
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus pacificus Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 55
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus pacificus Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 64
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus pacificus Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 74
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus pacificus Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 77
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus pacificus Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Functional group microbenthos
  2. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus pacificus Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size (qualitative) <0.2 mm
  2. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus polynesiensis M.Chinain & M.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 39
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus polynesiensis M.Chinain & M.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 50
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Length
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus polynesiensis M.Chinain & M.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 54
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus polynesiensis M.Chinain & M.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 62
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Minimum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus polynesiensis M.Chinain & M.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 66
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Width
  5. [Details]


 Gambierdiscus polynesiensis M.Chinain & M.Faust, 1999
  1. Body size 70
  2. Unit µm
  3. Type Maximum
  4. Dimension Height
  5. [Details]


 Description
 for Amphidinium carterae Hulburt, 1957

Cells oval, dorsoventrally flattened. Epicone crescent-shaped, clearly deflected towards the left. Cingulum ... [details]
 Description
 for Amphidinium gibbosum (L.Maranda & Y.Shimizu) Flø Jørgensen & Shauna Murray, 2004

Cells are asymmetrical ellipsoid, with a slightly pointed antapex, dorsoventrally flattened. Minute epicone, ... [details]
 Description
 for Amphidinium operculatum Claparède & Lachmann, 1859

Cells ovoid, dorsoventrally flattened. Epicone 7–10 μm wide, anteriorly flat, with the right anterior corner ~ ... [details]
 Description
 for Coolia tropicalis M.A.Faust, 1995

Spherical cells with 1’ plate large and widened toward the ventral side, with lateral sides almost parallel, and ... [details]
 Description
 for Fukuyoa ruetzleri (M.A.Faust, Litaker, Vandersea, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester) F.Gómez, D.X.Qiu, R.M.Lopes & Senjie Lin, 2005

Cells are slightly laterally compressed, globular in shape, surface smooth. Thecal pores are numerous. Apical pore ... [details]
 Description
 for Fukuyoa yasumotoi (M.J.Holmes) F.Gómez, D.X.Qiu, R.M.Lopes & Senjie Lin, 2015

Cells are slightly laterally compressed, globular in shape, surface smooth. Thecal pores are numerous. Apical pore ... [details]
 Description
 for Gambierdiscus australes Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999

Lens-shaped, anterio-posteriorly compressed. Thecal surface smooth, covered with evenly distributed fine pores. ... [details]
 Description
 for Gambierdiscus belizeanus M.A.Faust, 1995

Lens-shaped, anterio-posteriorly compressed. Thecal surface heavily aerolated, covered with evenly distributed fine ... [details]
 Description
 for Gambierdiscus caribaeus Vandersea, Litaker, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009

Lens-shaped, anterio-posteriorly compressed. Thecal surface covered with evenly distributed fine pores. Apical pore ... [details]
 Description
 for Gambierdiscus carolinianus Litaker, Vandersea, M.A.Faust, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester, 2009

Lens-shaped, anterio-posteriorly compressed. Thecal surface covered with evenly distributed fine pores. Apical pore ... [details]
 Description
 for Gambierdiscus carpenteri Kibler, Litaker, M.A.Faust, W.C.Holland, Vandersea & P.A.Tester, 2009

Lens-shaped, anterio-posteriorly compressed. Thecal surface covered with evenly distributed fine pores. Apical pore ... [details]
 Description
 for Gambierdiscus excentricus S.Fraga, 2011

Lens-shaped, anterio-posteriorly compressed. Thecal surface smooth, covered with evenly distributed fine pores. ... [details]
 Description
 for Gambierdiscus pacificus Chinain & M.A.Faust, 1999

Lens-shaped, anterio-posteriorly compressed. Thecal surface smooth, covered with evenly distributed fine pores. ... [details]
 Description
 for Gambierdiscus polynesiensis M.Chinain & M.Faust, 1999

Lens-shaped, anterio-posteriorly compressed, asymmetrical in ventral view. Thecal surface smooth, covered with ... [details]
 Description
 for Gambierdiscus toxicus R.Adachi & Y.Fukuyo, 1979

Lens-shaped, anterio-posteriorly compressed. Thecal surface covered with evenly distributed fine pores. Apical pore ... [details]
 Description
 for Ostreopsis heptagona D.R.Norris, J.W.Bomber & Balech, 1985

Relatively large cells, broadly ovoidal, tapering ventrally in apical viewPlate 1’ peculiar and heptagonal, i.e. ... [details]
 Description
 for Ostreopsis lenticularis Y.Fukuyo, 1981

Cells lenticulate, pointing ventrally and compressed antero-posteriorly. Epitheca and hypotheca have almost the ... [details]
 Description
 for Ostreopsis mascarenensis Quod, 1994

Very large cells, broadly oval in shape, markedly flattened. Epitheca slightly convex in contrast to the hypotheca ... [details]
 Description
 for Ostreopsis ovata Fukuyo, 1981

Cells ovate and ventrally slender. Antero-posterior length nearly equal to the transdiameter (width). Dorsoventral ... [details]
 Description
 for Prorocentrum concavum Y.Fukuyo, 1981

Broad oval to ovoid cells with central pyrenoid (starch ring). Reticulate-foveate thecal surface with scattered ... [details]
 Description
 for Prorocentrum emarginatum Y.Fukuyo, 1981

Round to oval asymmetric cells. Some cells (in culture) with central pyrenoid (starch ring). Foveate thecal surface ... [details]
 Description
 for Prorocentrum leve M.A.Faust, M.W.Vandersea, S.R.Kibler, P.A.Tester & R.W.Litaker, 2008

Broad oval cells with central pyrenoid (starch ring). Smooth thecal surface with scattered pores becoming more ... [details]
 Description
 for Prorocentrum lima (Ehrenberg) F.Stein, 1878

Almost round to oblong oval to ovoid cells with striking pyrenoid with starch sheath (visible as ring) in the ... [details]
 Description
 for Prorocentrum rhathymum Loeblich III, Sherley & Schmidt, 1979

Oval to oblong, asymmetric cells with smooth thecal surface with characteristic pore pattern (one apical row, ... [details]
 Description
 for Vulcanodinium rugosum Nézan & Chomérat, 2011

The hypotheca is trapezoidal to hemispherical and acuminate at the antapex. The cingulum is wide, descending ... [details]
 Identification
 for Amphidinium carterae Hulburt, 1957

Similar species: Amphidinium massartii. Remarks: There are at least 4 distinct genotypes of this species (Murray et ... [details]
 Identification
 for Amphidinium gibbosum (L.Maranda & Y.Shimizu) Flø Jørgensen & Shauna Murray, 2004

Amphidinium steinii, Amphidinium trulla, and Amphidinium cupulatisquama are similar species. This species was ... [details]
 Identification
 for Amphidinium klebsii Kofoid & Swezy, 1921

The species Amphidinium klebsii Kofoid and Swezy was based on a description by Klebs (1884) (as A. operculatum), ... [details]
 Identification
 for Coolia tropicalis M.A.Faust, 1995

Comparatively fewer pores than in C. monotis.  [details]
 Identification
 for Fukuyoa ruetzleri (M.A.Faust, Litaker, Vandersea, Kibler, W.C.Holland & P.A.Tester) F.Gómez, D.X.Qiu, R.M.Lopes & Senjie Lin, 2005

This species is highly similar to F. yasumotoi. It is distinguished by a combination of morphometric features, the ... [details]
 Identification
 for Fukuyoa yasumotoi (M.J.Holmes) F.Gómez, D.X.Qiu, R.M.Lopes & Senjie Lin, 2015

This species is highly similar to Fukuyoa ruetzleri. It is distinguished by a combination of morphometric features, ... [details]
 Identification
 for Ostreopsis lenticularis Y.Fukuyo, 1981

Contrary to the statement by Penna et al. (2005) that the elongated or rounded shape is one of the main differences ... [details]
 Identification
 for Prorocentrum concavum Y.Fukuyo, 1981

In the light microscope free-swimming cells cannot be distinguished from Prorocentrum malayense, a species that can ... [details]
 Identification
 for Prorocentrum leve M.A.Faust, M.W.Vandersea, S.R.Kibler, P.A.Tester & R.W.Litaker, 2008

Similar species: P. concavum. For morphological identification help look here: ... [details]
 Identification
 for Prorocentrum lima (Ehrenberg) F.Stein, 1878

Similar species: P. consutum, P. maculosum. Remarks: A wide range of morphological variability has been reported ... [details]
 Identification
 for Prorocentrum rhathymum Loeblich III, Sherley & Schmidt, 1979

For morphological identification help look here: ... [details]
 Status
 for Prorocentrum rhathymum Loeblich III, Sherley & Schmidt, 1979

The species was suggested by Gomez et al. (2017) to be a synonym of Prorocentrum mexicanum. However, the two ... [details]
 Taxonomy
 for Prorocentrum mexicanum Osorio-Tafall, 1942

The species was suggested by Gomez et al. (2017) to be a synonym of Prorocentrum mexicanum. However, the two ... [details]