Scleractinia taxon details
Cyathosmilia Tenison-Woods, 1878 †
1289014 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1289014)
accepted
Genus
Cyathosmilia laticostata Tenison-Woods, 1878 † (type by original designation)
- Species Cyathosmilia laticostata Tenison-Woods, 1878 †
- Species Cyathosmilia tenuiscostata Tenison-Woods, 1878 †
- Species Cyathosmilia velata Dennant, 1902 †
- Species Cyathosmilia carryensis Repelin, 1900 † accepted as Cyclomussa carryensis (Repelin, 1900) † (unaccepted > superseded combination, basionym)
marine, fresh, terrestrial
fossil only
Tenison Woods, J. E. (1878). On some fossil corals from Aldinga. <em>Transactions and Proceedings and Report of the Philosophical Society of Adelaide.</em> 1: 104-119, pls. 1-2., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/35533019 [details]
Status Tenison-Woods (1878) mentioned two species. Of the first one he was more certain that it belonged to this genus than the...
Status Tenison-Woods (1878) mentioned two species. Of the first one he was more certain that it belonged to this genus than the second. Therefore the first one is considered as being designated as the type species of the genus. [details]
Hoeksema, B. W.; Cairns, S. (2024). World List of Scleractinia. Cyathosmilia Tenison-Woods, 1878 †. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/scleractinia/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1289014 on 2024-05-01
original description
Tenison Woods, J. E. (1878). On some fossil corals from Aldinga. <em>Transactions and Proceedings and Report of the Philosophical Society of Adelaide.</em> 1: 104-119, pls. 1-2., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/35533019 [details]
basis of record Duncan PM (1884) A revision of the families and genera of the sclerodermic Zoantharia, Ed. & H., or Madreporaria (M. Rugosa excepted). Journal of the Linnean Society of London, 18: 1-204. [details]
basis of record Duncan PM (1884) A revision of the families and genera of the sclerodermic Zoantharia, Ed. & H., or Madreporaria (M. Rugosa excepted). Journal of the Linnean Society of London, 18: 1-204. [details]
From editor or global species database
Status Tenison-Woods (1878) mentioned two species. Of the first one he was more certain that it belonged to this genus than the second. Therefore the first one is considered as being designated as the type species of the genus. [details]