Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS)

Data Policy
Persons | Institutes | Publications | Projects | Datasets
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page
Detection of macrobenthos species with metabarcoding is consistent in bulk DNA but dependent on body size and sclerotization in eDNA from the ethanol preservative
Derycke, S.; Maes, S.; Van Den Bulcke, L.; Vanhollebeke, J.; Wittoeck, J.; Hillewaert, H.; Ampe, B.; Haegeman, A.; Hoste, K.; De Backer, A. (2021). Detection of macrobenthos species with metabarcoding is consistent in bulk DNA but dependent on body size and sclerotization in eDNA from the ethanol preservative. Front. Mar. Sci. 8: 637858. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.637858
In: Frontiers in Marine Science. Frontiers Media: Lausanne. e-ISSN 2296-7745
Peer reviewed article  
Available in  Authors 
Keywords
Author keywords
    metabarcoding, ethanol preservative, eDNA, bulk DNA, morphological traits
Authors  Top 
  • Derycke, S., more
  • Maes, S.
  • Van Den Bulcke, L.
  • Vanhollebeke, J.
  • Wittoeck, J., more
  • Hillewaert, H., more
  • Ampe, B.
  • Haegeman, A.
  • Hoste, K., more
  • De Backer, A.
Abstract
    DNA metabarcoding is a promising method to increase cost and time efficiency of marine monitoring. While substantial evidence exists that bulk DNA samples adequately reflect diversity patterns of marine macrobenthos, the potential of eDNA in the ethanol preservative of benthic samples for biodiversity monitoring remains largely unexplored. We investigated species detection in bulk DNA and eDNA from the ethanol preservative in samples from four distinct macrobenthic communities in the North Sea. Bulk DNA and eDNA were extracted with different extraction kits and five COI primer sets were tested. Despite the availability of a nearly complete reference database, at most 22% of the amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were assigned taxonomy at the phylum level. However, the unassigned ASVs represented only a small fraction of the total reads (13%). The Leray primer set outperformed the four other primer sets in the number of non-chimeric reads and species detected, and in the recovery of beta diversity patterns. Community composition differed significantly between bulk DNA and eDNA samples, but both sample types were able to differentiate the four communities. The probability of detecting a species in the eDNA from the ethanol preservative was significantly lower than for bulk DNA for macrobenthos species having small to medium body size and for species having chitine or CaCO3 in their cuticula. Detection in the bulk DNA samples was not affected by the investigated morphological traits, indicating that monitoring of macrobenthos species will be most robust when using bulk DNA as template for metabarcoding.
All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors 
[Back]

WoRMS

Using WoRMS

Tools

Connect with us

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»
Website and databases developed and hosted by Flanders Marine Institute · Page generated on 2025-05-13 15:59:29+02:00 · Privacy and cookie policy