WoRMS name details
Eunice concinna (Verrill, 1900)
1821731 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1821731)
unaccepted > superseded combination (superseded subsequent combination)
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
(of Leodice concinna Verrill, 1900) Verrill, A.E. 1900. Additions to the Turbellaria, Nemertina, and Annelida of the Bermudas, with revisions of some New England genera and species. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 10(2): 595-671., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/27731368
page(s): 643; note: Bermuda 1898, Yale scientific party, locations not named, in dead corals possibly collected from dredging inside the reef as described by Verrill for the mollusca. [details] Available for editors
[request]
page(s): 643; note: Bermuda 1898, Yale scientific party, locations not named, in dead corals possibly collected from dredging inside the reef as described by Verrill for the mollusca. [details] Available for editors
[request]
Taxonomy Leodice is now a valid genus again, but Fauchald (1992) presents the name recombined as Eunice concinna (because Leodice...
Taxonomy Leodice is now a valid genus again, but Fauchald (1992) presents the name recombined as Eunice concinna (because Leodice was at the time a synonym of Eunice) and states that as the types are lost (according to Hartman, 1942) the species is indeterminable (although there is a description, including that the species resembled Leodice stigmatura and L vittata). [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2025). World Polychaeta Database. Eunice concinna (Verrill, 1900). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1821731 on 2025-09-10
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 License
Nomenclature
original description
(of Leodice concinna Verrill, 1900) Verrill, A.E. 1900. Additions to the Turbellaria, Nemertina, and Annelida of the Bermudas, with revisions of some New England genera and species. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 10(2): 595-671., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/27731368
page(s): 643; note: Bermuda 1898, Yale scientific party, locations not named, in dead corals possibly collected from dredging inside the reef as described by Verrill for the mollusca. [details] Available for editors [request]
new combination reference Fauchald, K. (1992). A review of the genus <i>Eunice</i> (Eunicidae: Polychaeta) based upon type material. <em>Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology.</em> 523: 1-422., available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.5479/si.00810282.523
page(s): 113; note: Leodice is now a valid genus again, but Fauchald (1992) presents the name recombined as Eunice concinna (because Leodice was at the time a synonym of Eunice) and states that as the types are lost (acc...
[details]
page(s): 643; note: Bermuda 1898, Yale scientific party, locations not named, in dead corals possibly collected from dredging inside the reef as described by Verrill for the mollusca. [details] Available for editors
[request]new combination reference Fauchald, K. (1992). A review of the genus <i>Eunice</i> (Eunicidae: Polychaeta) based upon type material. <em>Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology.</em> 523: 1-422., available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.5479/si.00810282.523
page(s): 113; note: Leodice is now a valid genus again, but Fauchald (1992) presents the name recombined as Eunice concinna (because Leodice was at the time a synonym of Eunice) and states that as the types are lost (acc...
Leodice is now a valid genus again, but Fauchald (1992) presents the name recombined as Eunice concinna (because Leodice was at the time a synonym of Eunice) and states that as the types are lost (according to Hartman, 1942) the species is indeterminable (although there is a description, including that the species resembled Leodice stigmatura and L vittata).
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Leodice is now a valid genus again, but Fauchald (1992) presents the name recombined as Eunice concinna (because Leodice was at the time a synonym of Eunice) and states that as the types are lost (according to Hartman, 1942) the species is indeterminable (although there is a description, including that the species resembled Leodice stigmatura and L vittata). [details]
