WoRMS name details

Spiroglyphus Daudin, 1800

818567  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:818567)

nomen dubium (invalid: on Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Generic Names in Zoology)
Genus
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
masculine
Not documented
Status This nominal genus was introduced with two nominal species, Spiroglyphus politus Daudin, 1800 and Spiroglyphus annulatus...  
Status This nominal genus was introduced with two nominal species, Spiroglyphus politus Daudin, 1800 and Spiroglyphus annulatus Daudin, 1800. Widely used since the 1840s as molluscan genus and mostly applied to entrenching vermetids in today’s concept of Dendropoma. Hartman (1959: 47) included Spiroglyphus in her list of possible polychaete annelid genera. Keen (1961: 184, 191) stated that the included species “should probably classed as annelids” and for Spiroglyphus it is “advisable to set it aside as a genus dubium”; she subsequently (Keen & Hadfield 1985) sought suppression of the name under I.C.Z.N. rules. Placed on the Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Generic Names in Zoology in Opinion 1425 (I.C.Z.N. 1987). [see Bieler & Petit, 2011: 18-19] [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2021). MolluscaBase. Spiroglyphus Daudin, 1800. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=818567 on 2021-01-16
Date
action
by
2014-09-29 08:40:44Z
created
db_admin
2020-02-06 08:22:14Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


status source Bieler, R.; Petit, R. E. (2011). Catalogue of Recent and fossil “worm-snail” taxa of the families Vermetidae, Siliquariidae, and Turritellidae (Mollusca: Caenogastropoda). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 2948, 1-103., available online at http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2011/f/zt02948p103.pdf
page(s): 18-19 [details]   

status source ICZN. (1987). Opinion 1425. Suppressed: <i>Spiroglyphus</i> Daudin, 1800 and <i>Stoa</i> De Serres, Mollusca, Gastropoda) and specific names published in combination with them. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature. 44(1): 57-58., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12229416 [details]   
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
From editor or global species database
Status This nominal genus was introduced with two nominal species, Spiroglyphus politus Daudin, 1800 and Spiroglyphus annulatus Daudin, 1800. Widely used since the 1840s as molluscan genus and mostly applied to entrenching vermetids in today’s concept of Dendropoma. Hartman (1959: 47) included Spiroglyphus in her list of possible polychaete annelid genera. Keen (1961: 184, 191) stated that the included species “should probably classed as annelids” and for Spiroglyphus it is “advisable to set it aside as a genus dubium”; she subsequently (Keen & Hadfield 1985) sought suppression of the name under I.C.Z.N. rules. Placed on the Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Generic Names in Zoology in Opinion 1425 (I.C.Z.N. 1987). [see Bieler & Petit, 2011: 18-19] [details]