WoRMS name details

Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorAlcyonium cuspidiferum Lamarck, 1815

189892  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:189892)

Unaccepted: synonym, or anything that is not accepted unaccepted (genus transfer)
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Lamarck, J.B.P. De Monet, Comte De. (1815 [1814]). Suite des polypiers empâtés. Mémoires du Muséum d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. 1: 69-80, 162-168, 331-340. [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorHolotype  MNHN DT 652  
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorHolotype MNHN DT 652 [details]
Trusted: edited by a thematic editorDistribution Caribbean Sea  
Trusted: edited by a thematic editortype locality contained in Caribbean Sea [details]
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorNote Lamarck (1815) did not know the origin of the...  
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorType locality Lamarck (1815) did not know the origin of the type material, other than that it was part of the 'Stathouder' collection (i.e. the collection 'sequestered' from the Netherlands during Napoleontic times). The species has been reliably redescribed from Caribbean localities, so by inference the type must have been collected also from there.  [details]
van Soest, R. (2016). Alcyonium cuspidiferum. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=189892 on 2017-12-14

Date
action
by
2005-12-18 15:00:44Z
created
2006-08-07 17:38:25Z
changed
2008-07-20 12:55:31Z
changed
2016-10-23 13:49:21Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Lamarck, J.B.P. De Monet, Comte De. (1815 [1814]). Suite des polypiers empâtés. Mémoires du Muséum d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. 1: 69-80, 162-168, 331-340. [details]  OpenAccess publication 
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien 
 

Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorHolotype MNHN DT 652 [details]
From editor or global species database
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorType locality Lamarck (1815) did not know the origin of the type material, other than that it was part of the 'Stathouder' collection (i.e. the collection 'sequestered' from the Netherlands during Napoleontic times). The species has been reliably redescribed from Caribbean localities, so by inference the type must have been collected also from there.  [details]