Echinoidea name details
original description
Philip, G. M. 1969. The Tertiary echinoids of south-eastern Australia. IV. Camarodonta (2). Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 82, 233-275., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/57164334 page(s): 240-242 [details]
basis of record
Kier, P. M. & Lawson, M. H. 1978. Index of living and fossil echinoids 1924-1970. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 34, 1-182., available online at https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810266.34.1 page(s): 39 [details] Available for editors 
status source
Jeffery, C. H.; Emlet, R. B. (2003). MACROEVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES OF DEVELOPMENTAL MODE IN TEMNOPLEURID ECHINOIDS FROM THE TERTIARY OF SOUTHERN AUSTRALIA. <em>Evolution.</em> 57(5): 1031-1048., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00314.x page(s): 1034; Tab. 1 [details]
From editor or global species database
Diagnosis Usually large sculptured temnopleurids with strongly crenulate tubercles and sharp gill slits. The pore-pairs of the ambulacra are arranged usually in well-marked arcs within each triad. The apical system is regularly dicyclic. Mature individuals are obscurely sculptured, usually with irregular granules. The perignathic girdle consists of high auricles united above the ambulacra. [details]
Etymology The generic name, indistinct, refers to the poorly defined sculpture of adult members of the genus. [details]
|