| Intro | | About | | Wiki | | Search traits | | Data explorer | | Literature | | Definitions | | Sources | | Webservices | | Statistics | | Feedback | | Editors | | Log in |
Ostracoda taxon detailsArgilloecia gracilior Chapman, 1910
460380 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:460380)
accepted
Species
marine,
recent only
Chapman, F. (1910). On the Foraminifera and Ostracoda from soundings (chiefly deep-water) collected round Funafuti by H.M.S. Penguin. <em>Journal of the Linnean Society of London.</em> 30: 388-444., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/31567796 [details]
Status Hartmann (1997: 266) does not explicitly write "nomen dubium" in his text, but he states "...Die Art ist weder ausreichend...
Status Hartmann (1997: 266) does not explicitly write "nomen dubium" in his text, but he states "...Die Art ist weder ausreichend beschrieben noch ist wahrscheinlich, dass es sich bei Chapmans Material um eine einzige Art handelt", consequently Hartmann does consider this species a nomen dubium. [details]
Brandão, S. N.; Antonietto, L. S.; Pereira, J. S.; Pereira, S. G. G.; Sá, H. A. B.; Praxedes, R. A.; Sabater, L. M., Santos, S.G.; Karanovic, I. (2025). World Ostracoda Database. Argilloecia gracilior Chapman, 1910. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/Ostracoda/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=460380 on 2025-05-21
Date action by
original description
Chapman, F. (1910). On the Foraminifera and Ostracoda from soundings (chiefly deep-water) collected round Funafuti by H.M.S. Penguin. <em>Journal of the Linnean Society of London.</em> 30: 388-444., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/31567796 [details]
status source Hartmann G. (1997). Antarktische und subantarktische Podocopa (Ostracoda). Synopses of the Antarctic Benthos. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, 355. page(s): 266 [details]  Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Status Hartmann (1997: 266) does not explicitly write "nomen dubium" in his text, but he states "...Die Art ist weder ausreichend beschrieben noch ist wahrscheinlich, dass es sich bei Chapmans Material um eine einzige Art handelt", consequently Hartmann does consider this species a nomen dubium. [details]
|
