Banner
Intro | About | Wiki | Search traits | Data explorer | Literature | Definitions | Sources | Webservices | Statistics | Feedback | Editors | Log in

Traits taxon details

Phalacrophorus borealis Reibisch, 1895

338262  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:338262)

accepted
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Reibisch, J.G.F. (1895). Die pelagischen Phyllodociden und Typhloscoleciden der Plankton-Expedition. <em>Ergebnisse der in dem Atlantischen Ocean von Mitte Juli bis Anfang November 1889 ausgeführten Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Stiftung.</em> 2.H.c: 1-63, plates I-V., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2130690
page(s): 12, plate 1, figure 8-9 [details] 
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2025). World Polychaeta Database. Phalacrophorus borealis Reibisch, 1895. Accessed through: Marine Species Traits editorial board (2025) Marine Species Traits at: https://www.marinespecies.org/traits/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=338262 on 2025-06-03
Marine Species Traits editorial board (2025). Marine Species Traits. Phalacrophorus borealis Reibisch, 1895. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/traits/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=338262 on 2025-06-03
Date
action
by
2008-03-18 12:55:09Z
created
2008-03-26 11:36:43Z
changed
2020-11-09 23:09:44Z
changed

original description Reibisch, J.G.F. (1895). Die pelagischen Phyllodociden und Typhloscoleciden der Plankton-Expedition. <em>Ergebnisse der in dem Atlantischen Ocean von Mitte Juli bis Anfang November 1889 ausgeführten Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Stiftung.</em> 2.H.c: 1-63, plates I-V., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2130690
page(s): 12, plate 1, figure 8-9 [details] 

status source Dales, Rodney Phillips; Peter, George. (1972). A synopsis of the pelagic Polychaeta. <em>Journal of Natural History.</em> 6(1): 55-92., available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/00222937200770071
page(s): 62; note: follows Tebble (1962, p. 426) in placing P. borealis as a junior synonym of P. pictus because they believe the absence of eyes is not significant. However, this is unlikely to be true for a pelagic w...    
follows Tebble (1962, p. 426) in placing P. borealis as a junior synonym of P. pictus because they believe the absence of eyes is not significant. However, this is unlikely to be true for a pelagic worm.
[details] Available for editors  PDF available
    Definitions

Loading...