| Intro | | About | | Wiki | | Search traits | | Data explorer | | Literature | | Definitions | | Sources | | Webservices | | Statistics | | Feedback | | Editors | | Log in |
Polychaeta name detailsSchistocomus Chamberlin, 1919
325224 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:325224)
unaccepted (subjective synonym)
Genus
Schistocomus hiltoni Chamberlin, 1919 accepted as Phyllocomus hiltoni (Chamberlin, 1919) (type by original designation)
marine,
recent only
masculine
Chamberlin, Ralph V. (1919). New polychaetous annelids from Laguna Beach, California. <em>Journal of Entomology and Zoology of Pomona College.</em> 11(1): 1-23., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12263520
page(s): 17, no figures; note: Laguna Beach, California [details] 
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2021). World Polychaeta Database. Schistocomus Chamberlin, 1919. Accessed at: http://www.marinespecies.org/polychaeta/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=325224 on 2025-05-30
Date action by
original description
Chamberlin, Ralph V. (1919). New polychaetous annelids from Laguna Beach, California. <em>Journal of Entomology and Zoology of Pomona College.</em> 11(1): 1-23., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12263520
page(s): 17, no figures; note: Laguna Beach, California [details] source of synonymy Day, John H. (1964). A review of the family Ampharetidae (Polychaeta. <em>Annals of the South African Museum.</em> 48(4): 97-120., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/40722718 page(s): 115 [details] Available for editors  [request]From editor or global species database
Synonymy Day (1957) moves Schistocomus hiltoni to Phyllocomus. As S. hiltoni is the type of Schistocomus this automatically means Schistocomus is a synonym of Phyllocomus. Day (1964) later formally presents Schistocomus as a junior synonym of Phyllocomus. However, Reuscher et al (2009) included Schistocomus as valid in a table of Ampharetinae genera, and there are some other usages since Day which continued with the combination Schistocomus hiltoni. According to Sui et al (2017) Reuscher currently agrees with Day that Schistocomus is not distinct from Phyllocomus. [details]
|