Banner
Intro | About | Wiki | Search traits | Data explorer | Literature | Definitions | Sources | Webservices | Statistics | Feedback | Editors | Log in

WoRMS taxon details

Eudistylia Bush, 1905

325075  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:325075)

accepted
Genus
Eudistylia gigantea Bush, 1905 accepted as Eudistylia vancouveri (Kinberg, 1866) (type by original designation)

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Bush, K.J. (1904 (1905)). Tubicolous annelids of the tribes Sabellides and Serpulides from the Pacific Ocean. <em>Harriman Alaska Expedition.</em> 12: 169-346, plates XXI-XLIV., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/22063650
page(s): 209 [details] 
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2025). World Polychaeta Database. Eudistylia Bush, 1905. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=325075 on 2025-06-01
Date
action
by
2008-03-05 14:39:51Z
created
2008-03-26 11:36:43Z
changed
2010-09-12 20:35:08Z
changed
2024-11-04 22:29:01Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


Nomenclature

original description Bush, K.J. (1904 (1905)). Tubicolous annelids of the tribes Sabellides and Serpulides from the Pacific Ocean. <em>Harriman Alaska Expedition.</em> 12: 169-346, plates XXI-XLIV., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/22063650
page(s): 209 [details] 

 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
From editor or global species database
Type designation Bush (1905) designated E. gigantea Bush as type (= subjective synonym of Sabella vancouveri (Kinberg, 1867)). Hartman catalogue (1959) has E vancouveri as type species of Eudistylia, but this is not correct, and E gigantea will forever be the type species of Eudistylia regardless of any subjective synonymy. Likewise Fitzhugh (1989: 80) states the Distylia type species is "Sabella vancouveri Kinberg,1867, by original designation." This is not true either. [details]
    Definitions

Loading...