WoRMS taxon details
Nitocra Boeck, 1865
157705 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:157705)
accepted
Genus
Nitocra typica Boeck, 1865 represented as Nitocra typica typica Boeck, 1865
Nitocrameira Liddell, 1912 · unaccepted (synonym)
Nitokra Boeck, 1865 · alternative representation (both spellings in use)
Transfuga Schmankevitsch, 1875 · unaccepted (synonym)
- Species Nitocra alperi Yildiz & Karaytuğ, 2024
- Species Nitocra arctolongus Shen & Tai, 1973
- Species Nitocra australis Soyer, 1975
- Species Nitocra balli Rouch, 1972
- Species Nitocra balnearia Por, 1964
- Species Nitocra bdellurae (Liddell, 1912)
- Species Nitocra bisetosa Mielke, 1993
- Species Nitocra blochi Soyer, 1975
- Species Nitocra californica Lang, 1965
- Species Nitocra cari Petkovski, 1954
- Species Nitocra chelifer Wilson C.B., 1932
- Species Nitocra colombiensis Fuentes-Reinés & Suárez-Morales, 2014
- Species Nitocra delaruei Soyer, 1975
- Species Nitocra dubia Sars G.O., 1927
- Species Nitocra elegans (Scott T., 1905)
- Species Nitocra elongata Marcus, 1968
- Species Nitocra esbe Karanovic, Eberhard, Cooper & Guzik, 2015
- Species Nitocra evergladensis Bruno & Reid in Bruno, Reid & Perry, 2002
- Species Nitocra fluviatilis Galhano, 1968
- Species Nitocra fragilis Sars G.O., 1905
- Species Nitocra galapagoensis Mielke, 1997
- Species Nitocra hamata Bodin, 1970
- Species Nitocra humphreysi Karanovic & Pesce, 2002
- Species Nitocra husmanni Kunz, 1977
- Species Nitocra hyperidis Jakobi, 1956
- Species Nitocra karanovici Chullasorn, Kangtia & Klangsin, 2014
- Species Nitocra kastjanensis Kornev & Chertoprud, 2008
- Species Nitocra koreanus Chang, 2007
- Species Nitocra laingensis Fiers, 1986
- Species Nitocra langi Karanovic, Eberhard, Cooper & Guzik, 2015
- Species Nitocra loweae Yildiz & Karaytuğ, 2024
- Species Nitocra malaica Kiefer, 1929
- Species Nitocra marinae Jaschnov, 1935
- Species Nitocra medusaea Humes, 1953
- Species Nitocra minor Willey, 1930
- Species Nitocra mozambica Huys, 2021
- Species Nitocra oligochaeta Giesbrecht, 1882
- Species Nitocra phlegraea Brehm, 1909
- Species Nitocra phreatica Bozic, 1964
- Species Nitocra pietschmanni Chappuis, 1934
- Species Nitocra platypus Daday, 1906
- Species Nitocra pontica Boeck, 1865
- Species Nitocra pori Karanovic, Eberhard, Cooper & Guzik, 2015
- Species Nitocra psammophila Noodt, 1952
- Species Nitocra pseudospinipes Yeatman, 1983
- Species Nitocra puebloviejensis Fuentes-Reinés, Suárez-Morales & Silva-Briano, 2022
- Species Nitocra quadriseta Wells & Rao, 1987
- Species Nitocra quangnamensis Tran, Trinh-Dang, Nguyen & Brancelj, 2025
- Species Nitocra reunionensis Bozic, 1969
- Species Nitocra rijekana Petkovski, 1954
- Species Nitocra salina (Schmankevitsch, 1875)
- Species Nitocra serdarsaki Yildiz & Karaytuğ, 2024
- Species Nitocra sewelli Gurney, 1927
- Species Nitocra simplex Schmeil, 1894
- Species Nitocra sonmezi Yildiz & Karaytuğ, 2024
- Species Nitocra sphaeromata Bowman, 1988
- Species Nitocra stygia Por, 1968
- Species Nitocra taylori Gómez, Carrasco & Morales-Serna, 2012
- Species Nitocra tenuicornis Brady & Robertson, 1873
- Species Nitocra uenoi Miura, 1962
- Species Nitocra vietnamensis Tran & Chang, 2012
- Species Nitocra wolterecki Brehm, 1909
- Species Nitocra yahiai (Blanchard & Richard, 1891)
- Species Nitocra yeelirrie Karanovic, Eberhard, Cooper & Guzik, 2015
- Species Nitocra baltica Arlt, 1983 accepted as Nitocra langi Karanovic, Eberhard, Cooper & Guzik, 2015 (unaccepted > junior homonym)
- Species Nitocra brevisetosa Daday, 1901 accepted as Canthocamptus brevisetosus (Daday, 1901) accepted as Viguierella coeca brevisetosa (Daday, 1901) accepted as Phyllognathopus coecus brevisetosus (Daday, 1901) (unaccepted > superseded combination)
- Species Nitocra divaricata Chappuis, 1924 accepted as Nitocrella divaricata (Chappuis, 1924) (unaccepted > superseded combination)
- Species Nitocra gracilimana Giesbrecht, 1902 accepted as Ameira gracilimana (Giesbrecht, 1902) (unaccepted > superseded combination)
- Species Nitocra incerta (Richard, 1893) accepted as Nitocrella hibernica incerta (Richard, 1893) accepted as Nitocra hibernica hibernica (Brady, 1880) (unaccepted > superseded combination)
- Species Nitocra inuber (Schmankevitsch, 1875) accepted as Nitocra hibernica (Brady, 1880) represented as Nitocra hibernica hibernica (Brady, 1880)
- Species Nitocra japonica (Miura, 1962) accepted as Nitocrella japonica Miura, 1962
- Species Nitocra muelleri Douwe, 1905 accepted as Nitocra lacustris (Schmankevitsch, 1875) represented as Nitocra lacustris lacustris (Schmankevitsch, 1875) (unaccepted > junior subjective synonym, (synonomized by Chang & Yoon, 2008) )
- Species Nitocra palustris (Brady, 1880) accepted as Nitocra spinipes spinipes Boeck, 1865
- Species Nitocra paradoxa Daday, 1903 accepted as Schizopera paradoxa (Daday, 1903) (unaccepted > superseded combination)
- Species Nitocra parafragilis Roe, 1958 accepted as Nitocra spinipes Boeck, 1865 represented as Nitocra spinipes spinipes Boeck, 1865 (unaccepted > junior subjective synonym)
- Species Nitocra stygia (Apostolov, 1976) accepted as Nitocra pori Karanovic, Eberhard, Cooper & Guzik, 2015 (unaccepted > junior homonym)
- Species Nitocra subterranea Chappuis, 1928 accepted as Nitocrella subterranea (Chappuis, 1928) accepted as Parapseudoleptomesochra subterranea (Chappuis, 1928) (unaccepted > superseded combination)
- Species Nitocra tau Giesbrecht, 1881 accepted as Ameira parvula (Claus, 1866) (unaccepted > junior subjective synonym)
- Species Nitocra treforti (Daday, 1884) accepted as Nitocra lacustris (Schmankevitsch, 1875) represented as Nitocra lacustris lacustris (Schmankevitsch, 1875) (unaccepted > junior subjective synonym)
- Species Nitocra tridens (Bozic, 1969) accepted as Nitocrella tridens Bozic, 1969 accepted as Parapseudoleptomesochra tridens (Bozic, 1969)
- Species Nitocra affinis Gurney, 1927 represented as Nitocra affinis affinis Gurney, 1927
- Species Nitocra fallaciosa Klie, 1937 represented as Nitocra fallaciosa fallaciosa Klie, 1937
- Species Nitocra hibernica (Brady, 1880) represented as Nitocra hibernica hibernica (Brady, 1880)
- Species Nitocra lacustris (Schmankevitsch, 1875) represented as Nitocra lacustris lacustris (Schmankevitsch, 1875)
- Species Nitocra mediterranea Brian, 1928 represented as Nitocra mediterranea mediterranea Brian, 1928
- Species Nitocra pusilla Sars G.O., 1911 represented as Nitocra pusilla pusilla Sars G.O., 1911
- Species Nitocra reducta Schäfer, 1936 represented as Nitocra reducta reducta Schäfer, 1936
- Species Nitocra spinipes Boeck, 1865 represented as Nitocra spinipes spinipes Boeck, 1865
- Species Nitocra typica Boeck, 1865 represented as Nitocra typica typica Boeck, 1865
Boeck, A. (1865). Oversigt over de ved Norges Kyster jagttagne Copepoder henhorende til Calanidernes, Cyclopidernes og Harpactidernes Familier. [Overview of the Copepods hunted on the coast of Norway belonging to the families Calanoidae, Cyclopoidae and Harpacticodidae.]. <em>Forhandlinger i Videnskabs-Selskabet i Christiania.</em> 1864: 226-282 [for 1864 however published in 1865]. [details] 
Nomenclature Bowman (1988) argued that, following ICZN (3rd edition) arts. 11(b)(v), 33(c) and 79(c), Nitocra is an incorrect subsequent...
Taxonomic remark this note is from Rony Huys 2023
Boeck (1865: 274) proposed the genus Nitokra Boeck, 1865 for two new species, N....
Nomenclature Bowman (1988) argued that, following ICZN (3rd edition) arts. 11(b)(v), 33(c) and 79(c), Nitocra is an incorrect subsequent spelling, and Nitokra cannot be suppresed as an unused senior synonym, and therefore, the "commonly" used spelling Nitocra should be replaced by the original spelling Nitokra. Some years later, Mielke (1993) suggested that the spelling Nitocra should prevail since "apart from rare exceptions only the name Nitocra has been used since" the description of Nitokra mihi by Boeck (1865). Mielke (1993) suggested to follow Bowman's second choice, "to supress Nitokra and validate Nitocra, in accordance with usage". Some "principal changes" introduced in the 4th edition of the ICZN appear in pages XXVI-XXIX. Change number 12 says "In most cases an author will be required to maintain the particular spelling in prevailing use for a name, even if it is found not to be the original spelling;..."). Also, art 33.3. and 33.3.1. say: "Any subsequent spelling of a name different from the correct original spelling, other than a mandatory change or an emendation, is an "incorrect subsequent spelling"; it is not an available name and, like an incorrect original spelling [Art. 32.4], it does not enter into homonymy and cannot be used as a substitute name, but when an incorrect subsequent spelling is in prevailing usage and is attributed to the publication of the original spelling, the subsequent spelling and attribution are to be preserved and the spelling is deemed to be a correct original spelling." The same reasoning was used by Wells (2007:88) who says "Bowman (1988) recognised that the name of this common and speciose genus has been misspelt—as Nitocra— since 1881 and argued that the original spelling (Nitokra) should be resumed. Mielke (1993) disagreed, believing the name that had been in common use for so long should prevail. At that time Mielke’s view would have required a ruling from the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature but to the best of my knowledge a case was not submitted. However, the situation is now resolved—in favour of Nitocra—by the adoption in Article 33 of the 4th Edition of the ICZN, 1999, of a new section 33.3.1. which allows “an incorrect subsequent spelling” to stand when it is in “prevailing usage” and has always been properly attributed to the original author."
Gómez, Carrasco & Morales-Serna, 2012 followed Mielke (1993), Wells (2007) but above all, the ICZN (1999) arts. 33.3 and 33.3.1. In the opinion of Samuel Gomez, the spelling Nitokra should be replaced by Nitocra.
[details]
Gómez, Carrasco & Morales-Serna, 2012 followed Mielke (1993), Wells (2007) but above all, the ICZN (1999) arts. 33.3 and 33.3.1. In the opinion of Samuel Gomez, the spelling Nitokra should be replaced by Nitocra.
[details]
Taxonomic remark this note is from Rony Huys 2023
Boeck (1865: 274) proposed the genus Nitokra Boeck, 1865 for two new species, N....
Taxonomic remark this note is from Rony Huys 2023
Boeck (1865: 274) proposed the genus Nitokra Boeck, 1865 for two new species, N. typica (type species by indication) and N. spinipes. The incorrect subsequent spelling Nitocra by Giesbrecht (1881: 256) became established in common usage. Interestingly, both the correct original spelling (in the text, except for one occasion on p. 121) and the incorrect subsequent spelling (in the figure captions of Tables I, III–XII) were used by Giesbrecht (1882). Bowman (1988: 174) argued that the correct original spelling Nitokra should be resumed since according to Article 33(c) of the 3rd edition of the Code (ICZN 1985) Nitocra is not an emendation of any sort and is therefore an unavailable name that cannot be used as a substitute name which, if adopted, could have triggered the suppression of Nitokra under Article 79(c). Mielke (1993: 265) had previously advocated the continued application of the spelling Nitocra on the basis of common usage but under the 3rd edition of the Code this would have required a ruling from the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature on a case that was, however, never submitted. Wells (2007: 88) reverted to Giesbrecht’s spelling by invoking Article 33.3.1 of the 4th edition of the Code (ICZN 1999) which states that “... when an incorrect subsequent spelling is in prevailing usage and is attributed to the publication of the original spelling, the subsequent spelling and attribution are to be preserved and the spelling is deemed to be a correct original spelling.” Bowman (1988) was clearly correct at the time of writing, but Wells (2007) is right about usage under the 4th edition of the Code and thus Nitocra should continue to replace Nitokra.
Boeck, A. (1865) Oversigt over de ved Norges Kyster jagttagne Copepoder henhörende til Calanidernes, Cyclopidernes og Harpactidernes Familier. Forhandlinger i Videnskabsselskabet i Kristiania, 1864, 226–282.
Bowman, T.E. (1988) Nitokra sphaeromata, a new harpacticoid copepod crustacean associated with the wood-boring isopod, Sphaeroma peruvianum, in Costa Rica. Proceedings of the biological Society of Washington, 101, 171–175.
Giesbrecht, W. (1882) Die freilebenden Copepoden der Kieler Foehrde. Vierter Bericht der Commission zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung der deutschen Meere, in Kiel für die Jahre 1877 bis 1881 (I. Abtheilung), 87–168, plates I–XII.
Mielke, W. (1993) Species of the taxa Orthopsyllus and Nitocra(Copepoda) from Costa Rica. Microfauna marina, 8, 247–266.
Wells, J.B.J. (2007) An annotated checklist and keys to the species of Copepoda Harpacticoida (Crustacea). Zootaxa, 1568, 1–872.
[details]
Boeck (1865: 274) proposed the genus Nitokra Boeck, 1865 for two new species, N. typica (type species by indication) and N. spinipes. The incorrect subsequent spelling Nitocra by Giesbrecht (1881: 256) became established in common usage. Interestingly, both the correct original spelling (in the text, except for one occasion on p. 121) and the incorrect subsequent spelling (in the figure captions of Tables I, III–XII) were used by Giesbrecht (1882). Bowman (1988: 174) argued that the correct original spelling Nitokra should be resumed since according to Article 33(c) of the 3rd edition of the Code (ICZN 1985) Nitocra is not an emendation of any sort and is therefore an unavailable name that cannot be used as a substitute name which, if adopted, could have triggered the suppression of Nitokra under Article 79(c). Mielke (1993: 265) had previously advocated the continued application of the spelling Nitocra on the basis of common usage but under the 3rd edition of the Code this would have required a ruling from the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature on a case that was, however, never submitted. Wells (2007: 88) reverted to Giesbrecht’s spelling by invoking Article 33.3.1 of the 4th edition of the Code (ICZN 1999) which states that “... when an incorrect subsequent spelling is in prevailing usage and is attributed to the publication of the original spelling, the subsequent spelling and attribution are to be preserved and the spelling is deemed to be a correct original spelling.” Bowman (1988) was clearly correct at the time of writing, but Wells (2007) is right about usage under the 4th edition of the Code and thus Nitocra should continue to replace Nitokra.
Boeck, A. (1865) Oversigt over de ved Norges Kyster jagttagne Copepoder henhörende til Calanidernes, Cyclopidernes og Harpactidernes Familier. Forhandlinger i Videnskabsselskabet i Kristiania, 1864, 226–282.
Bowman, T.E. (1988) Nitokra sphaeromata, a new harpacticoid copepod crustacean associated with the wood-boring isopod, Sphaeroma peruvianum, in Costa Rica. Proceedings of the biological Society of Washington, 101, 171–175.
Giesbrecht, W. (1882) Die freilebenden Copepoden der Kieler Foehrde. Vierter Bericht der Commission zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung der deutschen Meere, in Kiel für die Jahre 1877 bis 1881 (I. Abtheilung), 87–168, plates I–XII.
Mielke, W. (1993) Species of the taxa Orthopsyllus and Nitocra(Copepoda) from Costa Rica. Microfauna marina, 8, 247–266.
Wells, J.B.J. (2007) An annotated checklist and keys to the species of Copepoda Harpacticoida (Crustacea). Zootaxa, 1568, 1–872.
[details]
Walter, T.C.; Boxshall, G. (2025). World of Copepods Database. Nitocra Boeck, 1865. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=157705 on 2025-05-02
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 License
Nomenclature
original description
Boeck, A. (1865). Oversigt over de ved Norges Kyster jagttagne Copepoder henhorende til Calanidernes, Cyclopidernes og Harpactidernes Familier. [Overview of the Copepods hunted on the coast of Norway belonging to the families Calanoidae, Cyclopoidae and Harpacticodidae.]. <em>Forhandlinger i Videnskabs-Selskabet i Christiania.</em> 1864: 226-282 [for 1864 however published in 1865]. [details] 
original description (of Nitocrameira Liddell, 1912) Liddell, J.A. (1912). Nitocrameira bdellurae, nov. gen. et sp., a copepod of the family Canthocamptidae, parasitic in the egg-cases of Bdellura. Journal of the Linnean Society, Zoology 32:87-94, figs. 1-2, pls. 10-11. [details]
original description (of Transfuga Schmankevitsch, 1875) Schmankevitsch, V.I. (1875). Nekotoryya rakoobraznyya solyano-ozernykh' i presnykh vod' i otneshenie ikh' k' srede.[ Some Crustacea of salt and freshwater lakes, and their relation to the surrounding environment.]. <em>Zapiski Novorossiiskago Obshchestva Estestvoispytatelei (= Mémoires de la Société des Naturalistes de la Nouvelle Russie, Odessa).</em> 3(2):1-391, pls. 1-5. [details]
original description (of Nitokra Boeck, 1865) Boeck, A. (1865). Oversigt over de ved Norges Kyster jagttagne Copepoder henhorende til Calanidernes, Cyclopidernes og Harpactidernes Familier. [Overview of the Copepods hunted on the coast of Norway belonging to the families Calanoidae, Cyclopoidae and Harpacticodidae.]. <em>Forhandlinger i Videnskabs-Selskabet i Christiania.</em> 1864: 226-282 [for 1864 however published in 1865]. [details]
basis of record Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS). , available online at http://www.itis.gov [details]
original description (of Nitocrameira Liddell, 1912) Liddell, J.A. (1912). Nitocrameira bdellurae, nov. gen. et sp., a copepod of the family Canthocamptidae, parasitic in the egg-cases of Bdellura. Journal of the Linnean Society, Zoology 32:87-94, figs. 1-2, pls. 10-11. [details]
original description (of Transfuga Schmankevitsch, 1875) Schmankevitsch, V.I. (1875). Nekotoryya rakoobraznyya solyano-ozernykh' i presnykh vod' i otneshenie ikh' k' srede.[ Some Crustacea of salt and freshwater lakes, and their relation to the surrounding environment.]. <em>Zapiski Novorossiiskago Obshchestva Estestvoispytatelei (= Mémoires de la Société des Naturalistes de la Nouvelle Russie, Odessa).</em> 3(2):1-391, pls. 1-5. [details]
original description (of Nitokra Boeck, 1865) Boeck, A. (1865). Oversigt over de ved Norges Kyster jagttagne Copepoder henhorende til Calanidernes, Cyclopidernes og Harpactidernes Familier. [Overview of the Copepods hunted on the coast of Norway belonging to the families Calanoidae, Cyclopoidae and Harpacticodidae.]. <em>Forhandlinger i Videnskabs-Selskabet i Christiania.</em> 1864: 226-282 [for 1864 however published in 1865]. [details]
basis of record Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS). , available online at http://www.itis.gov [details]
Other
additional source
Lang, K. (1965). Copepoda Harpacticoida from the Californian Pacific coast. <em>Kungliga Svenska Vetensk-Akademiens Handlingar, Fjarde Serien. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm.</em> 10(2):1-560, figs. 1-303, pls. 1-6. (look up in IMIS) [details] Available for editors
[request]
additional source Lewis, M.H. (1980). Systematic studies on the New Zealand freshwater Harpacticoida (Crustacea: Copepoda). <em>Ph.D. Thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.</em> 314 pp., available online at https://hdl.handle.net/2292/1599
note: The author described a form of Nitocra, Nitocra spp. [details]
additional source Gómez, S., N.K. Carrasco & F.N. Morales-Serna. (2012). A new species of Nitocra Boeck, 1865 (Harpacticoida, Ameiridae, Ameirinae) from South Africa, with notes on its ecology and remarks on the statusof Nitocra sewelli husmanni Kunz, 1976. <em>Zookeys.</em> 244:33-58., available online at https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.244.2633 [details] Available for editors
[request]

additional source Lewis, M.H. (1980). Systematic studies on the New Zealand freshwater Harpacticoida (Crustacea: Copepoda). <em>Ph.D. Thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.</em> 314 pp., available online at https://hdl.handle.net/2292/1599
note: The author described a form of Nitocra, Nitocra spp. [details]
additional source Gómez, S., N.K. Carrasco & F.N. Morales-Serna. (2012). A new species of Nitocra Boeck, 1865 (Harpacticoida, Ameiridae, Ameirinae) from South Africa, with notes on its ecology and remarks on the statusof Nitocra sewelli husmanni Kunz, 1976. <em>Zookeys.</em> 244:33-58., available online at https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.244.2633 [details] Available for editors





From editor or global species database
Nomenclature Bowman (1988) argued that, following ICZN (3rd edition) arts. 11(b)(v), 33(c) and 79(c), Nitocra is an incorrect subsequent spelling, and Nitokra cannot be suppresed as an unused senior synonym, and therefore, the "commonly" used spelling Nitocra should be replaced by the original spelling Nitokra. Some years later, Mielke (1993) suggested that the spelling Nitocra should prevail since "apart from rare exceptions only the name Nitocra has been used since" the description of Nitokra mihi by Boeck (1865). Mielke (1993) suggested to follow Bowman's second choice, "to supress Nitokra and validate Nitocra, in accordance with usage". Some "principal changes" introduced in the 4th edition of the ICZN appear in pages XXVI-XXIX. Change number 12 says "In most cases an author will be required to maintain the particular spelling in prevailing use for a name, even if it is found not to be the original spelling;..."). Also, art 33.3. and 33.3.1. say: "Any subsequent spelling of a name different from the correct original spelling, other than a mandatory change or an emendation, is an "incorrect subsequent spelling"; it is not an available name and, like an incorrect original spelling [Art. 32.4], it does not enter into homonymy and cannot be used as a substitute name, but when an incorrect subsequent spelling is in prevailing usage and is attributed to the publication of the original spelling, the subsequent spelling and attribution are to be preserved and the spelling is deemed to be a correct original spelling." The same reasoning was used by Wells (2007:88) who says "Bowman (1988) recognised that the name of this common and speciose genus has been misspelt—as Nitocra— since 1881 and argued that the original spelling (Nitokra) should be resumed. Mielke (1993) disagreed, believing the name that had been in common use for so long should prevail. At that time Mielke’s view would have required a ruling from the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature but to the best of my knowledge a case was not submitted. However, the situation is now resolved—in favour of Nitocra—by the adoption in Article 33 of the 4th Edition of the ICZN, 1999, of a new section 33.3.1. which allows “an incorrect subsequent spelling” to stand when it is in “prevailing usage” and has always been properly attributed to the original author."Gómez, Carrasco & Morales-Serna, 2012 followed Mielke (1993), Wells (2007) but above all, the ICZN (1999) arts. 33.3 and 33.3.1. In the opinion of Samuel Gomez, the spelling Nitokra should be replaced by Nitocra.
[details]
Taxonomic remark this note is from Rony Huys 2023
Boeck (1865: 274) proposed the genus Nitokra Boeck, 1865 for two new species, N. typica (type species by indication) and N. spinipes. The incorrect subsequent spelling Nitocra by Giesbrecht (1881: 256) became established in common usage. Interestingly, both the correct original spelling (in the text, except for one occasion on p. 121) and the incorrect subsequent spelling (in the figure captions of Tables I, III–XII) were used by Giesbrecht (1882). Bowman (1988: 174) argued that the correct original spelling Nitokra should be resumed since according to Article 33(c) of the 3rd edition of the Code (ICZN 1985) Nitocra is not an emendation of any sort and is therefore an unavailable name that cannot be used as a substitute name which, if adopted, could have triggered the suppression of Nitokra under Article 79(c). Mielke (1993: 265) had previously advocated the continued application of the spelling Nitocra on the basis of common usage but under the 3rd edition of the Code this would have required a ruling from the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature on a case that was, however, never submitted. Wells (2007: 88) reverted to Giesbrecht’s spelling by invoking Article 33.3.1 of the 4th edition of the Code (ICZN 1999) which states that “... when an incorrect subsequent spelling is in prevailing usage and is attributed to the publication of the original spelling, the subsequent spelling and attribution are to be preserved and the spelling is deemed to be a correct original spelling.” Bowman (1988) was clearly correct at the time of writing, but Wells (2007) is right about usage under the 4th edition of the Code and thus Nitocra should continue to replace Nitokra.
Boeck, A. (1865) Oversigt over de ved Norges Kyster jagttagne Copepoder henhörende til Calanidernes, Cyclopidernes og Harpactidernes Familier. Forhandlinger i Videnskabsselskabet i Kristiania, 1864, 226–282.
Bowman, T.E. (1988) Nitokra sphaeromata, a new harpacticoid copepod crustacean associated with the wood-boring isopod, Sphaeroma peruvianum, in Costa Rica. Proceedings of the biological Society of Washington, 101, 171–175.
Giesbrecht, W. (1882) Die freilebenden Copepoden der Kieler Foehrde. Vierter Bericht der Commission zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung der deutschen Meere, in Kiel für die Jahre 1877 bis 1881 (I. Abtheilung), 87–168, plates I–XII.
Mielke, W. (1993) Species of the taxa Orthopsyllus and Nitocra(Copepoda) from Costa Rica. Microfauna marina, 8, 247–266.
Wells, J.B.J. (2007) An annotated checklist and keys to the species of Copepoda Harpacticoida (Crustacea). Zootaxa, 1568, 1–872.
[details]
2 spellings in use: Nitocra vs Nitokra
3x5 C.B. Wilson Taxonomic Card - Nitocra
3x5 C.B. Wilson Taxonomic Card - Nitocrameira
(from synonym Nitocrameira Liddell, 1912)
3x5 C.B. Wilson Taxonomic Card - Nitokra
(from synonym Nitokra Boeck, 1865)
3x5 C.B. Wilson Taxonomic Card - Transfuga
(from synonym Transfuga Schmankevitsch, 1875)
3x5 J.S. Ho Taxonomic Card - Nitocrameira
(from synonym Nitocrameira Liddell, 1912)
3x5 J.S. Ho Taxonomic Card - Nitokra
(from synonym Nitokra Boeck, 1865)
Speling: Nitokra vs Nitocra
(from synonym Nitokra Boeck, 1865)
To European Nucleotide Archive, ENA (Nitokra) (from synonym Nitokra Boeck, 1865)
To Genbank
To Genbank (from synonym Nitokra Boeck, 1865)
To ITIS

3x5 C.B. Wilson Taxonomic Card - Nitocra

3x5 C.B. Wilson Taxonomic Card - Nitocrameira

3x5 C.B. Wilson Taxonomic Card - Nitokra

3x5 C.B. Wilson Taxonomic Card - Transfuga

3x5 J.S. Ho Taxonomic Card - Nitocrameira

3x5 J.S. Ho Taxonomic Card - Nitokra

Speling: Nitokra vs Nitocra

To European Nucleotide Archive, ENA (Nitokra) (from synonym Nitokra Boeck, 1865)
To Genbank
To Genbank (from synonym Nitokra Boeck, 1865)
To ITIS