WoRMS taxon details

Cybicola buccatus (Wilson C.B., 1922)

571976  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:571976)

accepted
Species
marine
(of Pseudocycnus buccatus Wilson C.B., 1922) Wilson, C.B. (1922). North American parasitic copepods belonging to the family Dichelestiidae. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 60(5)(2400):1-100, pls. 1-13. (22-iii-1922). [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Taxonomic remark Cybicola was proposed by Bassett-Smith as a replacement name for Helleria. It was not used in combination with any specific...  
Taxonomic remark Cybicola was proposed by Bassett-Smith as a replacement name for Helleria. It was not used in combination with any specific epithet, which might indicate gender, so the gender is masculine following Article 30.1.4.2 of the Code [details]
Walter, T.C.; Boxshall, G. (2024). World of Copepods Database. Cybicola buccatus (Wilson C.B., 1922). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=571976 on 2024-04-26
Date
action
by
2011-05-17 12:23:56Z
created
2016-07-26 09:09:59Z
changed
2019-07-06 12:13:37Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description  (of Pseudocycnus buccatus Wilson C.B., 1922) Wilson, C.B. (1922). North American parasitic copepods belonging to the family Dichelestiidae. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 60(5)(2400):1-100, pls. 1-13. (22-iii-1922). [details]  OpenAccess publication 

original description  (of Cybicola elongata Pearse, 1951) Pearse, A.S. (1951). Parasitic Crustacea from Bimini, Bahamas. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 101(3280):341-372, figs. 67-77. (2-ii-1951) [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
 
 Present  Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio   Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark Cybicola was proposed by Bassett-Smith as a replacement name for Helleria. It was not used in combination with any specific epithet, which might indicate gender, so the gender is masculine following Article 30.1.4.2 of the Code [details]