Compositae taxon details
Florestina Cass.
- Species Florestina latifolia (DC.) Rydb.
- Species Florestina liebmannii Sch.Bip. ex Greenm.
- Species Florestina lobata B.L.Turner
- Species Florestina pedata (Cav.) Cass.
- Species Florestina platyphylla (B.L.Rob. & Greenm.) B.L.Rob. & Greenm.
- Species Florestina purpurea (Brandegee) Rydb.
- Species Florestina simplicifolia B.L.Turner
- Species Florestina tripteris DC.
- Species Florestina callosa (Nutt.) DC. accepted as Palafoxia callosa (Nutt.) Torr. & A.Gray
- Species Florestina viscosissima (Standl. & Steyerm.) Heiser accepted as Florestina pedata (Cav.) Cass.
(1825). Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris [details]
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:F0DCBF53-61A2-4330-A884-43FF87F4EE03
Taxonomy Notes from Flann et al. 2010 Taxon 59: Type - Stevia pedata Cav. (F. pedata (Cav.) Cass. in Cuvier , Dict. Sci. Nat.,...
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:F0DCBF53-61A2-4330-A884-43FF87F4EE03 [details]
Taxonomy Notes from Flann et al. 2010 Taxon 59: Type - Stevia pedata Cav. (F. pedata (Cav.) Cass. in Cuvier , Dict. Sci. Nat.,...
Taxonomy Notes from Flann et al. 2010 Taxon 59: Type - Stevia pedata Cav. (F. pedata (Cav.) Cass. in Cuvier , Dict. Sci. Nat., Planches, Bot., Dicot.: t [86]. ante Jul 1820) Notes: Florestina first appears, as a nomen nudum, in Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris 1815: 175 1815, and is sometimes cited from there. In the subsequent protologue of the generic name, the type is incorrectly given as ‘Stevia pedata, Willd.’, where the author must be corrected to Cav. The combination ‘F. pedata’ was not published by Cassini in 1815. In the other place from which it has been cited (in Cuvier, Dict. Sci. Nat. 17: 156 1820) there is a reference to ‘Atlas du Dict. des Sc. nat., 3e cahier, pl. 8’, with the clear implication that it was published earlier. No details are known of the mode and dates of publication of the plates, but from Cassini’s indication we can presume the following: (1) the (unnumbered) plates were issued in arbitrary order, in instalments (cahiers); (2) numbers were assigned afterward, in a table of contents for the complete volume, to be used for the sequence of binding; (3) the plate with Florestina pedata was included in the 3rd instalment (either of Botany or of the Dicotyledons), which was published before July 1820, as the 8th plate either of that instalment or of the whole volume (it was later to be renumbered ‘86’). [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Florestina Cass.. Accessed at: https://www.compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1075400 on 2024-04-30
Date
action
by
original description
(1825). Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris [details]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From other sources
Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon recordFlorestina [Funk et al. 2009] [details]
Contributed data: Published Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris 1815 [Govaerts World Compositae Checklist A-G]
Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris 1817 [Kadereit & Jeffrey 2007]
Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris 1817: 11 [Flann et al. 2010 Cassini Genera]
Bulletin des Sciences, par la Societe Philomatique 1817: [Tropicos] [details]
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:F0DCBF53-61A2-4330-A884-43FF87F4EE03 [details]
Taxonomy Notes from Flann et al. 2010 Taxon 59: Type - Stevia pedata Cav. (F. pedata (Cav.) Cass. in Cuvier , Dict. Sci. Nat., Planches, Bot., Dicot.: t [86]. ante Jul 1820) Notes: Florestina first appears, as a nomen nudum, in Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris 1815: 175 1815, and is sometimes cited from there. In the subsequent protologue of the generic name, the type is incorrectly given as ‘Stevia pedata, Willd.’, where the author must be corrected to Cav. The combination ‘F. pedata’ was not published by Cassini in 1815. In the other place from which it has been cited (in Cuvier, Dict. Sci. Nat. 17: 156 1820) there is a reference to ‘Atlas du Dict. des Sc. nat., 3e cahier, pl. 8’, with the clear implication that it was published earlier. No details are known of the mode and dates of publication of the plates, but from Cassini’s indication we can presume the following: (1) the (unnumbered) plates were issued in arbitrary order, in instalments (cahiers); (2) numbers were assigned afterward, in a table of contents for the complete volume, to be used for the sequence of binding; (3) the plate with Florestina pedata was included in the 3rd instalment (either of Botany or of the Dicotyledons), which was published before July 1820, as the 8th plate either of that instalment or of the whole volume (it was later to be renumbered ‘86’). [details]
