WoRMS name details
Loxokalypus pedicellinoides d'Hondt & Gordon, 1999
1026006 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1026006)
uncertain > nomen dubium
Species
marine, fresh, terrestrial
d'Hondt, J.-L.; Gordon, D.P. (1999). Entoproctes et Bryozoaires Cheilostomida (Pseudomalacostegomorpha et Cryptocystomorpha) des campagnes MUSORSTOM autour de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. <em>in: Crosnier, A. (Ed.) Résultats des Campagnes MUSORSTOM 20. Mémoires du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle. Série A, Zoologie.</em> 180: 169-251., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/59028216 [details]
Holotype MNHN MNHN-BRY-16706
Holotype MNHN MNHN-BRY-16706 [details]
Taxonomy Loxokalypus pedicellinoides is a very problematic species. I have some years ago corresponded with Dennis Gordon and Peter...
Taxonomy Loxokalypus pedicellinoides is a very problematic species. I have some years ago corresponded with Dennis Gordon and Peter Emschermann about it, and they were both quite uncertain about the identity of the not very good material. The species has of course been described, but whether it is a Loxokalypus is questionable. [details]
WoRMS (2024). Loxokalypus pedicellinoides d'Hondt & Gordon, 1999. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1026006 on 2024-08-27
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
d'Hondt, J.-L.; Gordon, D.P. (1999). Entoproctes et Bryozoaires Cheilostomida (Pseudomalacostegomorpha et Cryptocystomorpha) des campagnes MUSORSTOM autour de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. <em>in: Crosnier, A. (Ed.) Résultats des Campagnes MUSORSTOM 20. Mémoires du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle. Série A, Zoologie.</em> 180: 169-251., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/59028216 [details]
Present Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
Holotype MNHN MNHN-BRY-16706 [details]
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Loxokalypus pedicellinoides is a very problematic species. I have some years ago corresponded with Dennis Gordon and Peter Emschermann about it, and they were both quite uncertain about the identity of the not very good material. The species has of course been described, but whether it is a Loxokalypus is questionable. [details]
