WoRMS name details

Hexacanalis thapari Shinde, Jadhav & Jadhav, 1986

517502  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:517502)

uncertain > taxon inquirendum
Species
marine
Not documented
Taxonomy Jensen (2005) considered this to be a species inquirenda, Cielocha and Jensen (2011) a species inquirenda and incertae...  
Taxonomy Jensen (2005) considered this to be a species inquirenda, Cielocha and Jensen (2011) a species inquirenda and incertae sedis. The authors neither explicitly fixed a holotype to syntypes, nor included a statement of intent that types will be (or are) deposited in a collection and a statement indicating the name and location of that collection. Thus, type material is essentially NOT available. In addition, this species is unrecognizable based on its original description. It is therefore considered a species inquirenda. Its membership in Hexacanalis is doubtful. [details]
WoRMS (2025). Hexacanalis thapari Shinde, Jadhav & Jadhav, 1986. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=517502 on 2025-06-01
Date
action
by
2010-09-13 07:28:49Z
created
2010-09-13 09:35:26Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


Other

additional source Jensen, K., Cielocha, J. J., Herzog, K. S., Caira, J. N. (2017). Lecanicephalidea Hyman, 1951. <em>In Planetary Biodiversity Inventory (2008-2017): Tapeworms from Vertebrate Bowels of the Earth.</em> J. N. Caira & K. Jensen (eds). University of Kansas, Natural History Museum, Special Publication No. 25, KS, USA, pp. 207-229. [details] 

additional source Ghosh, A.; Sreeraj, C. R. (2023). Fauna of India Checklist: Platyhelminthes. <em>Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata.</em> 49 pp., available online at https://doi.org/10.26515/fauna/1/2023/platyhelminthes [details] 

From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Jensen (2005) considered this to be a species inquirenda, Cielocha and Jensen (2011) a species inquirenda and incertae sedis. The authors neither explicitly fixed a holotype to syntypes, nor included a statement of intent that types will be (or are) deposited in a collection and a statement indicating the name and location of that collection. Thus, type material is essentially NOT available. In addition, this species is unrecognizable based on its original description. It is therefore considered a species inquirenda. Its membership in Hexacanalis is doubtful. [details]
    Definitions

Loading...