Banner
Introduction | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Specimens | Attributes | Literature | Photo gallery | Stats | Log in

Echinoidea source details

Kroh, A. & Mooi, R. (2010). World Echinoidea Database.
147420
Kroh, A. & Mooi, R.
2010
World Echinoidea Database
Database
RIS (EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
BibTex (BibDesk, LaTeX)
Date
action
by
2013-01-12 18:30:12Z
created
db_admin

 Authority

Often attributed to Agassiz, 1840 [possibly a nomen nudum in that work], but also to Desor and to Smiser - needs to ... [details]

 Authority

This species is variably attribute to: Audouin, 1809 Audouin, 1826 Audouin, 1829 Michelin, 1845 Based on a ... [details]

 Authority

Galerites rhodomagensis was first mentioned by Agassiz (1839: p. 78) in the discussion of Galerites castanea. It ... [details]

 Authority

Galerites rhodomagensis was first mentioned by Agassiz (1839: p. 78) in the discussion of Galerites castanea. It ... [details]

 Etymology

"globulus" --> descriptive, Latin for a small ball/sperule [details]

 Holotype

Natural History Museum Vienna No. NHMW 1864/0001/0062 [details]

 Publication date

An offprint of Abich's 1859 article "Ueber das Steinsalz...." was published 1857 with dual pagination and the names ... [details]

 Publication date

Published June 1972 according to table of publication dates on last page of volume (p. 1146) [details]

 Publication date

An offprint of Abich's 1859 article "Ueber das Steinsalz...." was published 1857 with dual pagination and the names ... [details]

 Publication date

An offprint of Abich's 1859 article "Ueber das Steinsalz...." was published 1857 with dual pagination and the names ... [details]

 Publication date

Sometimes cited as 1857, however, appears to have been published 1858. Desor's Synopsis was published in parts and ... [details]

 Publication date

An offprint of Abich's 1859 article "Ueber das Steinsalz...." was published 1857 with dual pagination and the names ... [details]

 Spelling

Several spelling variants exist (rhodomagensis, rhotomagensis, and rothomagensis) only the last one is valid since ... [details]

 Spelling

Sternopneustes is a common misspelling for the two echinoid genera Stereopneustes (Holasteroida: Corystusidae) and ... [details]

 Status

Parent taxon is a nomen nudum; possibly belongs to genus Eupatagus, but this needs to be confirmed. [details]

 Status

proposed conditionally in the original description, but is available since it was published before 1961 (see ICZN ... [details]

 Status

Note by taxonomic editor: before using this taxon double check if a replacement name was needed at all - this is a ... [details]

 Status

The holotype is a fragmentary specimen, which clearly belongs to the family Loveniidae, but apparently lacks ... [details]

 Status

Monotypic - too poorly known to be able to place with certainty. [details]

 Status

The status of the tribe Phyllacanthina is not clear at present and needs to be investigated. It is included here ... [details]

 Status

Taxon poorly known, of uncertain placement and status; Needs redescription based on type-material. [details]

 Status

generic attribution uncertain, apparently a cidaroid spine. [details]

 Status

Taxon poorly known, of uncertain placement and status; Needs redescription based on type-material. [details]

 Status

This species is based on an indeterminate fragment which definitifely does not derive from a strongylocentrotid, or ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Based on a unique specimen that has a crushed petaloid region; possibly lacked strong internal support structures ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

Originally proposed as an infrasubspecific taxon (variety), but is to be treated as a subspecies according to the ... [details]


Website and databases developed and hosted by VLIZ · Page generated 2021-10-19 GMT · contact: Kroh Andreas