WoRMS taxon details

Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorAricideopsis Johnson, 1901

325706

urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:325706

Unaccepted: synonym, or anything that is not accepted unaccepted (subjective synonym)
Genus

Species Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorAricideopsis megalops Johnson, 1901 accepted as Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorLaonice cirrata (M. Sars, 1851) (subjective synonym)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Johnson, Herbert Parlin. (1901). The Polychaeta of the Puget Sound region. Proceedings of the Boston Society for Natural History. 29(18): 381-437, plates 1-19., available online at http://www.archive.org/stream/proceedingsbost07unkngoog#page/n436/mode/2up [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Read, G. (2016). Aricideopsis Johnson, 1901. In: Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2017). World Polychaeta database. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at http://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=325706 on 2017-11-18

Date
action
by
2008-03-14 12:50:56Z
created
2008-03-26 11:36:43Z
changed
2015-07-17 09:47:47Z
changed
2016-10-16 23:04:30Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License



original description Johnson, Herbert Parlin. (1901). The Polychaeta of the Puget Sound region. Proceedings of the Boston Society for Natural History. 29(18): 381-437, plates 1-19., available online at http://www.archive.org/stream/proceedingsbost07unkngoog#page/n436/mode/2up [details]  OpenAccess publication 

source of synonymy Hartman, O. 1944. Polychaetous annelids. Part VI. Paraonidae, Magelonidae, Longosomidae, Ctenodrilidae, and Sabellariidae. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions, 10(3): 311-389.
page(s): 314; note: Not Paraonidae & provisionally referred to Laonice in Spionidae [details]   
From editor or global species database
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorSynonymy Hartman (1944: 314) suggested Aricideopsis was not Paraonidae as originally placed and provisionally referred it to Laonice in Spionidae. It appears there is no disagreement with this assessment. [details]