WoRMS name details

Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorSarsiella Hartlaub, 1907

117071 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:117071)
Unaccepted: synonym, or anything that is not accepted unaccepted (invalid junior synonym of Sarsiella capsula Norman, 1869 [Crustacea] and type species unrecognisable)
Genus

Species Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorSarsiella dinema Hartlaub, 1907 (taxon inquirendum, unrecognisable)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTaxonomy Hartlaub (1907) thought that Haeckel (1879)...  
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTaxonomy Hartlaub (1907) thought that Haeckel (1879) misidentified a corynid medusa from the Channel coast with Dinema slabberi van Beneden, 1866. Dinema slabberi van Beneden, 1866 clearly belongs to the Pandeidae, and it probably is a synonym of Leuckartiara octona. Although there is no reason to assume that Haeckel had a corynid medusa, Hartlaub (1907) proposed the new name Sarsiella dinema for Haeckel's medusa. Hartlaub even created a new genus based on the assumption that it has only two marginal bulbs. He thought that Dicodonium differed from Sarsiella by having four marginal bulbs. There exists no figure of Haeckel's medusa and it must be considered unrecognisable. I tend to follow the opinion of Mayer (1910: 47) that it was based on an abnormal or mutilated specimen. [details]
Schuchert, P. (2014). Sarsiella Hartlaub, 1907. In: Schuchert, P. (2017). World Hydrozoa database. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at http://www.marinespecies.org/traits/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=117071 on 2017-11-24

Date
action
by
2004-12-21 15:54:05Z
created
2009-05-13 06:57:10Z
changed
2014-10-06 06:01:15Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License



basis of record van der Land, J.; Vervoort, W.; Cairns, S.D.; Schuchert, P. (2001). Hydrozoa, in: Costello, M.J. et al. (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels, 50: pp. 112-120 (look up in IMIS[details]   

additional source Kramp P.L. (1961a). Synopsis of the medusae of the world. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the U. K. 40: 1-469., available online at http://www.mba.ac.uk/nmbl/publications/jmba_40/jmba_40.htm [details]  OpenAccess publication 

status source Schuchert, P. (2001). Survey of the family Corynidae (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa). Revue Suisse de Zoologie. 108: 739-878., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/128352#page/317/mode/1up
page(s): 860 [details]  OpenAccess publication 
From editor or global species database
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTaxonomy Hartlaub (1907) thought that Haeckel (1879) misidentified a corynid medusa from the Channel coast with Dinema slabberi van Beneden, 1866. Dinema slabberi van Beneden, 1866 clearly belongs to the Pandeidae, and it probably is a synonym of Leuckartiara octona. Although there is no reason to assume that Haeckel had a corynid medusa, Hartlaub (1907) proposed the new name Sarsiella dinema for Haeckel's medusa. Hartlaub even created a new genus based on the assumption that it has only two marginal bulbs. He thought that Dicodonium differed from Sarsiella by having four marginal bulbs. There exists no figure of Haeckel's medusa and it must be considered unrecognisable. I tend to follow the opinion of Mayer (1910: 47) that it was based on an abnormal or mutilated specimen. [details]

From other sources
Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editorHomonymy Also in database as valid genus in Sarsiellidae (Ostracoda) - needs checking [details]