WoRMS taxon details

Haliotrema canescens Yamaguti, 1968 (nec Mizelle & Price, 1964)

717609  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:717609)

accepted
Species
marine
Yamaguti, S. (1968). Monogenetic trematodes of Hawaiian fishes. <em>University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.</em> 287 pp. [details]   
Homonymy Secondary homonym of Haliotrema canescens (Mizelle & Price, 1964) Young, 1968  
Homonymy Secondary homonym of Haliotrema canescens (Mizelle & Price, 1964) Young, 1968 [details]

Taxonomic remark Mentioned as a 'presumed' synonym of H. parahaliotrema (as Parahaliotrema parahaliotrema) by Vala et al. (1982), although...  
Taxonomic remark Mentioned as a 'presumed' synonym of H. parahaliotrema (as Parahaliotrema parahaliotrema) by Vala et al. (1982), although Klassen (1994) did not include these two taxa in the same species group. [details]
WoRMS (2024). Haliotrema canescens Yamaguti, 1968 (nec Mizelle & Price, 1964). Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=717609 on 2024-04-28
Date
action
by
2013-02-05 07:59:18Z
created
2017-10-03 12:28:25Z
changed
2023-03-23 09:07:12Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Yamaguti, S. (1968). Monogenetic trematodes of Hawaiian fishes. <em>University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.</em> 287 pp. [details]   

source of synonymy Vala, J. C.; Maillard, C.; Overstreet, R. M. (1982). Haliotrema (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalinae) from Ostraciid Fishes in Guadeloupe, West Indies. <em>The Journal of Parasitology.</em> 68(6): 1130., available online at https://doi.org/10.2307/3281104 [details]   
 
 Present  Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio   Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

From editor or global species database
Homonymy Secondary homonym of Haliotrema canescens (Mizelle & Price, 1964) Young, 1968 [details]

Taxonomic remark Mentioned as a 'presumed' synonym of H. parahaliotrema (as Parahaliotrema parahaliotrema) by Vala et al. (1982), although Klassen (1994) did not include these two taxa in the same species group. [details]