| Intro | | About | | Wiki | | Search traits | | Data explorer | | Literature | | Definitions | | Sources | | Webservices | | Statistics | | Feedback | | Editors | | Log in |
Traits taxon detailsLissachatina Bequaert, 1950
881468 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:881468)
accepted
Genus
feminine
(of ) Bequaert, J. C. (1950). Studies in the Achatininae, a group of African land snails. <em>Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology.</em> 105(1): 1-216, plates 1-81., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11841320
page(s): 49 [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2025). MolluscaBase. Lissachatina Bequaert, 1950. Accessed through: Marine Species Traits editorial board (2025) Marine Species Traits at: https://www.marinespecies.org/traits/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=881468 on 2025-09-17
Marine Species Traits editorial board (2025). Marine Species Traits. Lissachatina Bequaert, 1950. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/traits/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=881468 on 2025-09-17
Date action by
original description
(of ) Bequaert, J. C. (1950). Studies in the Achatininae, a group of African land snails. <em>Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology.</em> 105(1): 1-216, plates 1-81., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11841320
page(s): 49 [details] status source Fontanilla I.K.C. (2010). </i>Achatina (Lissachatina) fulica</i> Bowdich: its molecular phylogeny, genetic variation in global populations, and its possible role in the spread of the rat lungworm <i>Angiostrongylus cantonensis</i> (Chen). PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. 634 pp. , available online at http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11069/1/Fontanilla-2010.pdf note: The molecular data presented in this PhD thesis clearly show that Lissachatina consistently clusters as a monophyletic entity separate from Achatina and Fontanilla stated that there is no basis for co... The molecular data presented in this PhD thesis clearly show that Lissachatina consistently clusters as a monophyletic entity separate from Achatina and Fontanilla stated that there is no basis for continuing to employ Lissachatina as a subgenus of Achatina and that it should be regarded as a genus in it own right.
|