WoRMS name details
original description
Gabb, W. M. 1869. Description of a new cone from the coast of Florida. American Journal of Conchology 4(4):195-196, pl. 15. [details]
additional source
Mansfield, W. C. (1930). Miocene gastropods and scaphopods of the Choctawhatchee Formation of Florida. <em>Florida State Geological Survey, Bulletin.</em> 3: 1-185, 21 pls., available online at https://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00000437/00001 page(s): 32, pl. 1, fig. 13 [details]
additional source
Tucker J.K. & Tenorio M.J. (2013) <i>Illustrated catalog of the living cone shells</i>. 517 pp. Wellington, Florida: MdM Publishing. note: treated as synonym of C. anabathrum [details]
status source
Berschauer, D.P. (2022). The true identity of <i>Gradiconus anabathrum</i> (Crosse, 1865). <em>Xenophora Taxonomy.</em> 35: 43-48. note: treated a a valid species [details]
Present Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Nomenclature ICZN Opinion 1539 (Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 46(2): 140) has ruled that the name Conus floridanus Gabb, 1869, is not to be given precedence over Conus anabathrum Crosse, 1865, by those authors considering that the two names refer to the same species. However, it had not declared Conus floridanus invalid or unavailable, and it remained a potentially valid name. The revalidation of the species Conus floridanus by Berschauer (2022) was nomenclaturally perfectly permissible, but is not tenable now when Leal et al. (2024) show that anabathrum and floridanus refer to the same taxonomical species.. [details]
From editor or global species database
From other sources
| |