WoRMS taxon details
Filograninae Rioja, 1923
886860 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:886860)
accepted
Subfamily
- Genus Apomatus Philippi, 1844
- Genus Bathyditrupa Kupriyanova, 1993
- Genus Bathyvermilia Zibrowius, 1973
- Genus Bathyvermilioides Kupriyanova & Flaxman, 2024
- Genus Chitinopoma Levinsen, 1884
- Genus Chitinopomoides Benham, 1927
- Genus Dasynema de Saint-Joseph, 1894
- Genus Filograna Berkeley, 1835
- Genus Filogranella Ben-Eliahu & Dafni, 1979
- Genus Filogranula Langerhans, 1884
- Genus Janita Saint Joseph, 1894
- Genus Josephella Caullery & Mesnil, 1896
- Genus Kimberleya Pillai, 2009 (accepted > unreplaced junior homonym, junior homonym to Kimberleya Weiss, 1916)
- Genus Metavermilia Bush, 1905
- Genus Microprotula Uchida, 1978
- Genus Omphalopomopsis Saint-Joseph, 1894
- Genus Paraprotis Uchida, 1978
- Genus Paumotella Chamberlin, 1919
- Genus Pomatostegus Schmarda, 1861
- Genus Protis Ehlers, 1887
- Genus Protula Risso, 1826
- Genus Pseudoprotula Pillai, 2009
- Genus Pseudovermilia Bush, 1907
- Genus Rhodopsis Bush, 1905
- Genus Salmacina Claparède, 1870
- Genus Semivermilia ten Hove, 1975
- Genus Spirodiscus Fauvel, 1909 (accepted > unreplaced junior homonym, junior homonym to Spirodiscus Stein, 1850, Mollusca)
- Genus Tanturia Ben-Eliahu, 1976
- Genus Turbocavus Prentiss, Vasileiadou, Faulwetter, Arvanitidis & ten Hove, 2014
- Genus Vermiliopsis Saint-Joseph, 1894
- Genus Zibrovermilia Kupriyanova & Ippolitov, 2015
marine, terrestrial
recent + fossil
Rioja, Enrique 1923. Estudio sistemático de las Especies Ibéricas del suborden Sabelliformia. Trabajos del Museo nacional de ciencias naturales 48: 5-144., available online at http://simurg.bibliotecas.csic.es/viewer/image/CSIC000082883/1/
page(s): key p.69, diagnosis p.107 [details]
page(s): key p.69, diagnosis p.107 [details]
Taxonomy Re-established subfamily. Created by Rioja to include Serpulidae with pinnules on the operculum stalk. He included genera...
Taxonomy Re-established subfamily. Created by Rioja to include Serpulidae with pinnules on the operculum stalk. He included genera Filograna, Salmacina, Apomatus, and Protula (Salmacina and Protula lack opercula). Fauchald (1977) included Filograna and Salmacina, and also Filogranula, Salmacinopsis and Spirodiscus. Molecular data of Kupriyanova et al (2006) grouped Salmacina and Filograna, but in wider view no justification for a distinct Filograninae clade existed. Subsequently Kupriyanova, ten Hove & Rouse, 2023 re-established Filograninae, based on molecular and morphological analysis, supported by presence of abdominal flat geniculate chaetae. [details]
WoRMS (2025). Filograninae Rioja, 1923. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=886860 on 2025-05-05
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 License
Nomenclature
original description
Rioja, Enrique 1923. Estudio sistemático de las Especies Ibéricas del suborden Sabelliformia. Trabajos del Museo nacional de ciencias naturales 48: 5-144., available online at http://simurg.bibliotecas.csic.es/viewer/image/CSIC000082883/1/
page(s): key p.69, diagnosis p.107 [details]
page(s): key p.69, diagnosis p.107 [details]
Taxonomy
status source
Kupriyanova, Elena K. and Macdonald, Tara A. and Rouse, G.W. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships within Serpulidae (Sabellida, Annelida) inferred from molecular and morphological data. Zoologica Scripta 35(5): 421-439.
note: molecular data group Salmacina and Filograna, but no distinct Filograninae group exists [details]
status source Kupriyanova, Elena; ten Hove, Harry; Rouse, Greg W. (2023). Phylogeny of Serpulidae (Annelida, Polychaeta) inferred from morphology and DNA sequences, with a new classification. <em>Diversity.</em> 15(3), 398: 1-24., available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/15/3/398
note: Filograninae is re-established, based on molecular and morphological analysis, supported by presence of abdominal flat geniculate chaetae. [details] Available for editors
[request]
note: molecular data group Salmacina and Filograna, but no distinct Filograninae group exists [details]
status source Kupriyanova, Elena; ten Hove, Harry; Rouse, Greg W. (2023). Phylogeny of Serpulidae (Annelida, Polychaeta) inferred from morphology and DNA sequences, with a new classification. <em>Diversity.</em> 15(3), 398: 1-24., available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/15/3/398
note: Filograninae is re-established, based on molecular and morphological analysis, supported by presence of abdominal flat geniculate chaetae. [details] Available for editors
[request]Other
additional source
Fauchald, K. (1977). The polychaete worms, definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. <em>Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County: Los Angeles, CA (USA), Science Series.</em> 28:1-188., available online at http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/123110.pdf
note: usage [details]
note: usage [details]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Re-established subfamily. Created by Rioja to include Serpulidae with pinnules on the operculum stalk. He included genera Filograna, Salmacina, Apomatus, and Protula (Salmacina and Protula lack opercula). Fauchald (1977) included Filograna and Salmacina, and also Filogranula, Salmacinopsis and Spirodiscus. Molecular data of Kupriyanova et al (2006) grouped Salmacina and Filograna, but in wider view no justification for a distinct Filograninae clade existed. Subsequently Kupriyanova, ten Hove & Rouse, 2023 re-established Filograninae, based on molecular and morphological analysis, supported by presence of abdominal flat geniculate chaetae. [details]
