Porifera name details

Cacochalina truncatella var. mollissima Lendenfeld, 1887

246570  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:246570)

 unaccepted (genus transfer)
Variety
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Lendenfeld, R. von. (1887). Die Chalineen des australischen Gebietes. <em>Zoologische Jahrbücher, Jena.</em> 2: 723-828, pls XVIII-XXVII.
page(s): 763 [details] OpenAccess publication
Holotype  BMNH 1887.8.27.682, geounit South New Zealand  
Holotype BMNH 1887.8.27.682, geounit South New Zealand [details]
de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Cárdenas, P.; Díaz, M.-C.; Dohrmann, M.; Downey, R.; Goodwin, C.; Hajdu, E.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Kelly, M.; Klautau, M.; Lim, S.C.; Manconi, R.; Morrow, C.; Pinheiro, U.; Pisera, A.B.; Ríos, P.; Rützler, K.; Schönberg, C.; Turner, T.; Vacelet, J.; van Soest, R.W.M.; Xavier, J. (2025). World Porifera Database. Cacochalina truncatella var. mollissima Lendenfeld, 1887. Accessed at: https://marinespecies.org/porifera/porifera.php?p=taxdetails&id=246570 on 2025-05-12
Date
action
by
2007-09-13 18:34:41Z
created
2019-05-11 17:18:59Z
changed

original description Lendenfeld, R. von. (1887). Die Chalineen des australischen Gebietes. <em>Zoologische Jahrbücher, Jena.</em> 2: 723-828, pls XVIII-XXVII.
page(s): 763 [details] OpenAccess publication

additional source Wiedenmayer, F. (1989). Demospongiae (Porifera) from northern Bass Strait, southern Australia. <em>Memoirs Museum Victoria.</em> 50(1): 1-242, pls 1-38. (look up in IMIS)
page(s): 71 [details] Available for editors  PDF available [request]

additional source Hooper, J.N.A.; Wiedenmayer, F. (1994). Porifera. <i>In</i>: Wells, A. (ed.) Zoological Catalogue of Australia. Volume 12. Melbourne, CSIRO. , available online at https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/taxa/PORIFERA/checklist
page(s): 208 [details] 
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

Holotype BMNH 1887.8.27.682, geounit South New Zealand [details]
From editor or global species database
Identification The identity of this material has not been properly evaluated by reexamination of the type. Various authors have expressed different opinions. We follow Wiedenmayer (1989) in his assessment that it is likely a Strongylacidon. [details]