 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
Porifera taxon detailsPlakortis Schulze, 1880
131983 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:131983)
accepted
Genus
Plakortis simplex Schulze, 1880 (type by monotypy)
Placortis · unaccepted (misspelling)
Roosa de Laubenfels, 1934 · unaccepted (junior synonym)
marine,
feminine
Schulze, F.E. (1880). Untersuchungen über den Bau und die Entwicklung der Spongien. Neunte Mittheilung. Die Plakiniden. <em>Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie.</em> 34(2): 407-451.
page(s): 449 [details] 
de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Cárdenas, P.; Díaz, M.-C.; Dohrmann, M.; Downey, R.; Goodwin, C.; Hajdu, E.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Kelly, M.; Klautau, M.; Lim, S.C.; Manconi, R.; Morrow, C.; Pinheiro, U.; Pisera, A.B.; Ríos, P.; Rützler, K.; Schönberg, C.; Turner, T.; Vacelet, J.; van Soest, R.W.M.; Xavier, J. (2025). World Porifera Database. Plakortis Schulze, 1880. Accessed at: https://marinespecies.org/porifera/porifera.php?p=taxdetails&id=131983 on 2025-05-13
Date action by
original description
Schulze, F.E. (1880). Untersuchungen über den Bau und die Entwicklung der Spongien. Neunte Mittheilung. Die Plakiniden. <em>Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie.</em> 34(2): 407-451.
page(s): 449 [details] original description (of Roosa de Laubenfels, 1934) Laubenfels, M.W. de. (1934). New sponges from the Puerto Rican deep. <em>Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections.</em> 91(17): 1-28. page(s): 2 [details] additional source Van Soest, R.W.M. (2001). Porifera, <b><i>in</i></b>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification</i>. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 85-103. (look up in IMIS) [details] additional source Borojevic, R.; Cabioch, L.; Lévi, C. (1968). Inventaire de la faune marine de Roscoff. Spongiaires. <em>Éditions de la Station Biologique de Roscoff.</em> pp. 1-44., available online at http://www.sb-roscoff.fr/images/stories/sbr/observation/documents/spongiaires.pdf page(s): 5 [details] Available for editors  [request]basis of record (of Roosa de Laubenfels, 1934) Muricy, G.; Diaz, M.C. (2002). Order Homosclerophorida Dendy, 1905. Family Plakinidae Schulze, 1880. pp. 71-82. In: Hooper, J.N.A.; van Soest, R.W.M. (Ed.) (2002) <em>Systema Porifera: a guide to the classification of sponges</em>(2 volumes). Kluwer Academic/Plenum, NY,1708 + XLVIII. ISBN 0-306-47260-0 (printed version). ISBN 0-306-47260-0 (printed version). (look up in IMIS) [details]  basis of record (of Roosa de Laubenfels, 1934) Muricy, G.; Diaz, M.C. (2002 [2004]). Order Homosclerophorida Dendy, 1905. Family Plakinidae Schulze, 1880. Pp. 71-82. <i>In</i>: Hooper, J.N.A.; van Soest, R.W.M. (Eds) <em>Systema Porifera - a guide to the classification of sponges</em> (2 volumes). Kluwer Academic/Plenum, NY, 1708 + XLVIII. ISBN 978-1-4615-0747-5 (eBook electronic version). [details] Available for editors [request]basis of record (of Placortis) Topsent, E. (1895). Étude monographique des Spongiaires de France. II.Carnosa. <em>Archives de Zoologie expérimentale et générale.</em> (3) 3: 493-590, pls XXI-XXII. page(s): 557 [details] additional source (of Placortis) Babiç, K. (1922). Monactinellida und Tetractinellida des Adriatischen Meeres. <em>Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere.</em> 46(2): 217-302, pls 8-9. [details] additional source (of Roosa de Laubenfels, 1934) Laubenfels, M.W. de. (1936). A Discussion of the Sponge Fauna of the Dry Tortugas in Particular and the West Indies in General, with Material for a Revision of the Families and Orders of the Porifera. <em>Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication.</em> 467 (Tortugas Laboratory Paper 30) 1-225, pls 1-22. page(s): 178 [details] Available for editors [request] Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Grammatical gender The gender of Plakortis is uncertain. Schulze did not indicate its gender, nor is the gender obvious from the adjectival name of the type species. If we consult the Latin grammar dictionaries it is likely that the gender is feminine, as nouns of the third declension ending in '-is' usually are feminine. However, this rule has exceptions and we cannot exclude the possibiity that this compound genus name is masculine. [details]
|
