WoRMS taxon details

Sculpsitechinus auritus (Leske, 1778)

828570  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:828570)

accepted
Species
Amphiope (Tetrodiscus) auritus (Leske, 1778) · unaccepted (unaccepted combination)
Echinodiscus auritus Leske, 1778 · unaccepted (transferred to Sculpsitechinus)
Echinodiscus inauritus Leske, 1778 · unaccepted (subjective junior synonym)
Echinus auritus (Leske, 1778) · unaccepted (unaccepted combination)
Lobophora aurita (Leske, 1778) · unaccepted (unaccepted combination)
Lobophora bifissa (Audouin, 1809) · unaccepted (subjective junior synonym)
Scutella aurita (Leske, 1778) · unaccepted (unaccepted combination)
Scutella bifissa Audouin, 1809 · unaccepted (subjective junior synonym)
Scutella inaurita (Leske, 1778) · unaccepted (subjective junior synonym)
Tetrodiscus auritus (Leske, 1778) · unaccepted (unaccepted combination)
Tetrodiscus rumphi Lambert & Thiéry, 1914 · unaccepted (subjective junior synonym)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent + fossil
(of Echinodiscus auritus Leske, 1778) Leske, N. G. 1778. Jacobi Theodori Klein naturalis dispositio echinodermatum . . ., edita et descriptionibus novisque inventis et synonomis auctorem aucta. Addimenta ad I. T. Klein naturalem dispositionem Echinodermatum. G. E. Beer, Leipzig, xxii+278 pp., available online at http://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/dms/load/img/?PID=PPN573613834
page(s): 202 [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Neotype  (of Echinodiscus auritus Leske, 1778) MAC...  
Neotype (of Echinodiscus auritus Leske, 1778) MAC MAC.IVM.109, geounit Mozambique Channel [details]
Type locality contained in Tuléar  
type locality contained in Tuléar [details]
Note Mangili, Tulear Province, Madagascar., Leske...  
From editor or global species database
Type locality Mangili, Tulear Province, Madagascar. [details]
Type material Leske (1778: 202), did not mention the locality where the specimens studied come from and neither the museum in which these specimen has been deposited. [details]
Kroh, A.; Mooi, R. (2024). World Echinoidea Database. Sculpsitechinus auritus (Leske, 1778). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=828570 on 2024-10-07
Date
action
by
2015-01-08 09:32:37Z
created

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description  (of Echinodiscus auritus Leske, 1778) Leske, N. G. 1778. Jacobi Theodori Klein naturalis dispositio echinodermatum . . ., edita et descriptionibus novisque inventis et synonomis auctorem aucta. Addimenta ad I. T. Klein naturalem dispositionem Echinodermatum. G. E. Beer, Leipzig, xxii+278 pp., available online at http://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/dms/load/img/?PID=PPN573613834
page(s): 202 [details]  OpenAccess publication 

original description  (of Echinodiscus inauritus Leske, 1778) Leske, N. G. 1778. Jacobi Theodori Klein naturalis dispositio echinodermatum . . ., edita et descriptionibus novisque inventis et synonomis auctorem aucta. Addimenta ad I. T. Klein naturalem dispositionem Echinodermatum. G. E. Beer, Leipzig, xxii+278 pp., available online at http://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/dms/load/img/?PID=PPN573613834
page(s): 202-204 [details]  OpenAccess publication 

original description  (of Scutella bifissa Audouin, 1809) Audouin, V. (1809). Explication sommaire des planches d'Échinoderms de l'Égypte et de la Syrie, publiées par J. C. Savigny, membre de l'Institut; offrant un exposé des caractères naturels des genres avec la distinction des espèces, par Victor Audouin. Pp. 203-212. in J. C. de Savigny, Description de l'Égypte ou recueil des observations et des recherches qui ont été faites en Égypte pendant l'Expédition de l'Armée Française, publié par les ordres de sa majesté l'empereur Napoléon le Grand. Histoire naturelle, Tome premier, Quatrième Partie: Explication sommaire des planches dont les dessins ont été fournis par M. J. Savigny, pour l'histoire naturelle de l'ouvrage. L'Imprimerie Impériale, Paris. , available online at http://descegy.bibalex.org/
page(s): 210; pl. 7: fig. 3.1-3.7 [details]  OpenAccess publication 

original description  (of Tetrodiscus rumphi Lambert & Thiéry, 1914) Lambert, J. & Thiéry, P. (1909-1925). Essai de Nomenclature Raisonnée des Echinides. L. Ferrière, Chaumont. fasc. 1: i-iii, 1-80, pls. 1-2 (March 1909); fasc. 2: 81-160, pls. 3-4 (July 1910); fasc. 3: 161-240, pls. 5-6 (May 1911); fasc. 4: 241-320, pls. 7-8 (March 1914); fasc. 5: 321-384, pl. 9 (Sept. 1921); fasc. 6-7: 385-512, pls. 10-11, 14 (Dec. 1924); fasc. 7-8: 513-607, pls. 12, 13, 15 (Feb. 1925) pp., available online at http://de.scribd.com/doc/17477843/Essai-de-Nomenclature-Raisonnee-des-Echinides#source:facebook
page(s): 323 [details]   

new combination reference Stara, P.; Sanciu, L. (2014). Analysis of some astriclypeids echinoids (Echinoidea Clypeasteroidea). – In: Stara, P. (ed.): Studies on some astriclypeids (Echinoidea Clypeasteroida). <em>Biodiversity Journal.</em> 5/2: 291-358., available online at http://www.biodiversityjournal.com/pdf/5(2)_291-358.pdf
page(s): 348-351 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
 
 Present  Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio   Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

Neotype (of Echinodiscus auritus Leske, 1778) MAC MAC.IVM.109, geounit Mozambique Channel [details]
From editor or global species database
Diagnosis Medium sized species, with a low side profile and axially elongated notches in the posterior ambulacra. Petals closed distally, in a small petalodium. In the oral interambulacrum 5 there are 3 post-basicoronal plates in column “a” and 4 in column “b”, with the first two partially coupled; between the petals tips and the notches there are 4 - 5 couples of plates, and the periproct opens along the suture between plates 2b/2a in interambulacrum
5. [details]

Neotype Neotype: MAC.IVM.109 (TL = 125 mm); housed in the Department of Animal Biology and Ecology (UNICA), Cagliari, Italy [details]

Type locality Mangili, Tulear Province, Madagascar. [details]

Type material Leske (1778: 202), did not mention the locality where the specimens studied come from and neither the museum in which these specimen has been deposited. [details]
    Definitions

Loading...