MolluscaBase taxon details

Bullia livida Reeve, 1846

560599  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:560599)

accepted
Species
marine
Reeve, L. A. (1846-1847). Monograph of the genus <i>Bullia</i>. In: <i>Conchologia Iconica, or, illustrations of the shells of molluscous animals</i>, vol. 3, pl. 1-4 and unpaginated text. L. Reeve & Co., London. [stated dates: pls. 1-3, December 1846; 4, February 1847]. , available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11118803 [details]   
MolluscaBase eds. (2024). MolluscaBase. Bullia livida Reeve, 1846. Accessed at: https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=560599 on 2024-05-01
Date
action
by
2011-02-22 08:03:31Z
created
2012-12-07 22:00:05Z
changed
2013-09-06 16:22:18Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Reeve, L. A. (1846-1847). Monograph of the genus <i>Bullia</i>. In: <i>Conchologia Iconica, or, illustrations of the shells of molluscous animals</i>, vol. 3, pl. 1-4 and unpaginated text. L. Reeve & Co., London. [stated dates: pls. 1-3, December 1846; 4, February 1847]. , available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11118803 [details]   

basis of record Kaicher, S. D. (1982-1985). Card catalogue of world-wide shells. Nassariidae I, Pack #31: cards 3134-3238 (Nassarius striatus=card nr. 3214) [2 April 1982]; Nassariidae II, Pack #34: cards 3453-3558 [27 March 1983]; Nassariidae III, Pack #41: cards 4094-4199 [24 April 1985]., available online at http://www.femorale.com/kaicher/ [details]   

additional source Cernohorsky, W. O. (1984). Systematics of the family Nassariidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda). <em>Bulletin of the Auckland Institute and Museum.</em> 14: i-iv, 1-356. [published 12 July 1984]., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/59858109 [details]   
From editor or global species database
Validity Bullia livida had been synonymized with B. vittata by Cernohorsky (1984), but was recognized as valid by Kaicher. The latter opinion is back by Hugo Kool's personal observations. [details]