Schell, J.M., C.J. Santos-Flores, P.E. Allen, B.M. Hunker, S. Kloehn, A. Michelson, R.A. Lillie & S.I. Dodson. (2001). Physical-chemical influences on vernal zooplankton community structure in small lakes and wetlands of Wisconsin, U.S.A. Hydrobiologia. 445:37-50.

508632

10.1023/A:1017574316867 [view]

Schell, J.M., C.J. Santos-Flores, P.E. Allen, B.M. Hunker, S. Kloehn, A. Michelson, R.A. Lillie & S.I. Dodson

2001

445:37-50.

Publication

Available for editors   [request]

We sampled zooplankton communities from 54 small water bodies distributed throughout Wisconsin to evaluate whether a ‘snap-shot’ of zooplankton community structure during early spring could be used for the purpose of differentiating lakes from wetlands. We collected a single set of zooplankton and water chemistry data during a one-month time window (synchronized from south to north across the state) from an open water site in each basin as a means to minimize and standardize sampling effort and to minimize cascading effects arising from predatorprey interactions with resident and immigrant aquatic insect communities. We identi?ed 53 taxa of zooplankton from 54 sites sampled across Wisconsin. There was an average of 6.83 taxa per site. The zooplankton species were distributed with a great deal of independence. We did not detect signi?cant correlations between number of taxa and geographic region or waterbody size. There was a signi?cant inverse correlation between number of taxa and the concentration of calcium ion, alkalinity and conductivity. One pair of taxa, Lynceus brachyurus and Chaoborus americanus, showed a signi?cant difference in average duration of sites of their respective occurrence. All other pairs of taxa had no signi?cant difference in average latitude, waterbody surface area, total phosphorus, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, alkalinity, conductivity, calcium ion, sulfate, nitrate, silicate or chloride. Taxa were distributed at random among the sites – there were no statistically signi?cant pairs of taxa occurring together or avoiding each other. Multivariate analysis of zooplankton associations showed no evidence of distinct associations that could be used to distinguish lakes from wetlands. Zooplankton community structure appears to be a poor tool for distinguishing between lakes and wetlands, especially at the relatively large scale of Wisconsin (dimension of about 500 km). The data suggest that a small body of water in Wisconsin could be classi?ed as a wetland if it persists in the spring and summer for only about 4 months, and if it is inhabited by Lynceus brachyurus, Eubranchipus bundyi, and if Chaoborus americanus and Chydorus brevilabris are absent.

RIS (EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
BibTex (BibDesk, LaTeX)

[Back to search]