Copepoda name details
Brehmiella Chappuis, 1929
346871 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:346871)
unaccepted (preoccupied name)
Genus
Brehmiella northumbrica (Brady, 1880) accepted as Attheyella (Neomrazekiella) northumbrica (Brady, 1880) represented as Attheyella (Neomrazekiella) northumbrica northumbrica (Brady, 1880) accepted as Attheyella (Neomrazekiella) dentata dentata (Poggenpol, 1874) (type by original designation)
- Species Brehmiella northumbrica (Brady, 1880) accepted as Attheyella (Neomrazekiella) northumbrica (Brady, 1880) represented as Attheyella (Neomrazekiella) northumbrica northumbrica (Brady, 1880) accepted as Attheyella (Neomrazekiella) dentata dentata (Poggenpol, 1874) (synonym)
- Subspecies Brehmiella northumbrica trisetosa Chappuis, 1929 accepted as Attheyella (Neomrazekiella) northumbrica trisaetosa (Chappuis, 1929) (synonym)
- Species Brehmiella trispinosa (Brady, 1880) accepted as Attheyella (Neomrazekiella) trispinosa (Brady, 1880) (synonym)
- Species Brehmiella wulmeri (Kerhervé, 1914) accepted as Attheyella (Neomrazekiella) wulmeri (Kerhervé, 1914) represented as Attheyella (Neomrazekiella) wulmeri wulmeri (Kerhervé, 1914) (synonym)
Chappuis, P.A. (1929). Révision du genre Canthocamptus Westwood (Note préliminaire). [Revision of the genus Canthocamptus Westwood (Preliminary note).]. <em>Buletinul Societatii de Stiinte din Cluj.</em> 4(2):41-50. (27-i-1929) [received Dec 1928]. [details] Available for editors 
[request]
[request]
Taxonomy The genus-group name Brehmiella was described by Chappuis, 1929 as a subgenus belonging to the genus Attheyella Brady, 1880...
Taxonomy The genus-group name Brehmiella was described by Chappuis, 1929 as a subgenus belonging to the genus Attheyella Brady, 1880 in Copepoda (Crustacea). However, the genus name Brehmiella was proposed by Pascher, 1928 in Chrysomonadida (Protozoa). Therefore, Brehmiella Chappuis, 1929 was a junior homonym of Brehmiella Pascher, 1928. The junior homonym was duly changed by Brehm, 1949, who proposed the genus-group name Mrazekiella nomen novum pro Brehmiella Chappuis, 1929 in Arch. Hydrobiol., Stuttgart, 42: 515 in the family Canthocamptidae (Crustacea, Copepoda, Harpacticoidea).
However, prior to Brehm's action, the genus Mrazekiella Kijenskii, 1926 had been described in the family Radiophryidae (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Oligohymenophorea, Astomatida). The name Mrazekiella Brehm, 1949, proposed for a subgenus of the genus Attheyella Brady, 1880 (Crustacea, Copepoda, Harpacticoidea, Canthocamptidae), is preoccupied by Mrazekiella Kijenskii, 1926 (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Oligohymenophorea, Astomatida, Radiophryidae). It cannot be used as a valid genus name in Crustacea by homonymy.
_____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 1, No. 2, June 2006__________
212
Consequently, the name Neomrazekiella nom. nov. is here proposed as a replacement name. As a result of this, Mrazekiella Brehm, 1949 is a syn. nov. of Neomrazekiella nom. nov.
Mrazekiella Kijenskii, 1926 (Protozoa) is recorded in Nomenclator Zoologicus vol. 3 and Mrazekiella Brehm, 1949 (Crustacea) is recorded in Nomenclator Zoologicus vol. 6 by Neave and Edwards & Hopwood. [details]
However, prior to Brehm's action, the genus Mrazekiella Kijenskii, 1926 had been described in the family Radiophryidae (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Oligohymenophorea, Astomatida). The name Mrazekiella Brehm, 1949, proposed for a subgenus of the genus Attheyella Brady, 1880 (Crustacea, Copepoda, Harpacticoidea, Canthocamptidae), is preoccupied by Mrazekiella Kijenskii, 1926 (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Oligohymenophorea, Astomatida, Radiophryidae). It cannot be used as a valid genus name in Crustacea by homonymy.
_____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 1, No. 2, June 2006__________
212
Consequently, the name Neomrazekiella nom. nov. is here proposed as a replacement name. As a result of this, Mrazekiella Brehm, 1949 is a syn. nov. of Neomrazekiella nom. nov.
Mrazekiella Kijenskii, 1926 (Protozoa) is recorded in Nomenclator Zoologicus vol. 3 and Mrazekiella Brehm, 1949 (Crustacea) is recorded in Nomenclator Zoologicus vol. 6 by Neave and Edwards & Hopwood. [details]
Walter, T.C.; Boxshall, G. (2025). World of Copepods Database. Brehmiella Chappuis, 1929. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/copepoda/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=346871 on 2025-05-02
Date
action
by
original description
Chappuis, P.A. (1929). Révision du genre Canthocamptus Westwood (Note préliminaire). [Revision of the genus Canthocamptus Westwood (Preliminary note).]. <em>Buletinul Societatii de Stiinte din Cluj.</em> 4(2):41-50. (27-i-1929) [received Dec 1928]. [details] Available for editors [request]
additional source Chappuis, P.A. (1929). Die Unterfamilie der Canthocamptinae. [The subfamily Canthocamptinae.]. <em>Archiv für Hydrobiologie.</em> 20:471-516. [details] Available for editors [request]
[request]additional source Chappuis, P.A. (1929). Die Unterfamilie der Canthocamptinae. [The subfamily Canthocamptinae.]. <em>Archiv für Hydrobiologie.</em> 20:471-516. [details] Available for editors
[request]From editor or global species database
Taxonomy The genus-group name Brehmiella was described by Chappuis, 1929 as a subgenus belonging to the genus Attheyella Brady, 1880 in Copepoda (Crustacea). However, the genus name Brehmiella was proposed by Pascher, 1928 in Chrysomonadida (Protozoa). Therefore, Brehmiella Chappuis, 1929 was a junior homonym of Brehmiella Pascher, 1928. The junior homonym was duly changed by Brehm, 1949, who proposed the genus-group name Mrazekiella nomen novum pro Brehmiella Chappuis, 1929 in Arch. Hydrobiol., Stuttgart, 42: 515 in the family Canthocamptidae (Crustacea, Copepoda, Harpacticoidea).However, prior to Brehm's action, the genus Mrazekiella Kijenskii, 1926 had been described in the family Radiophryidae (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Oligohymenophorea, Astomatida). The name Mrazekiella Brehm, 1949, proposed for a subgenus of the genus Attheyella Brady, 1880 (Crustacea, Copepoda, Harpacticoidea, Canthocamptidae), is preoccupied by Mrazekiella Kijenskii, 1926 (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Oligohymenophorea, Astomatida, Radiophryidae). It cannot be used as a valid genus name in Crustacea by homonymy.
_____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 1, No. 2, June 2006__________
212
Consequently, the name Neomrazekiella nom. nov. is here proposed as a replacement name. As a result of this, Mrazekiella Brehm, 1949 is a syn. nov. of Neomrazekiella nom. nov.
Mrazekiella Kijenskii, 1926 (Protozoa) is recorded in Nomenclator Zoologicus vol. 3 and Mrazekiella Brehm, 1949 (Crustacea) is recorded in Nomenclator Zoologicus vol. 6 by Neave and Edwards & Hopwood. [details]
