WoRMS taxon details
Vigtorniella zaikai (Kiseleva, 1992)
129936 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:129936)
accepted
Species
Victoriella zaika Kiseleva, 1992 · unaccepted (superseded original combination...)
superseded original combination due to generic homonymy
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
(of Victoriella zaika Kiseleva, 1992) Kiseleva, M. I. 1992. [New genus and species of the family Chrysopetalidae (Polychaeta) from the Black Sea]. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 71(11): 128-132
, available online at http://www.tmbl.gu.se/staff/ThomasDahlgren/Trans/Kiseleva_1992.html [details] Available for editors 
[request]
[request]
Type locality contained in Black Sea , Note Watson et al (2016) state that "note type...
type locality contained in Black Sea [from synonym] [view taxon] [details]
From editor or global species database
Type material Watson et al (2016) state that "note type material not available for loan (Zoologicheskiy Institut RAN, Saint Petersburg, Russia)." It is not clear whether this sentence means the type material is lost, or that it is simply only examinable at the named institute. The latter would be the literal interpretation of the words, but the former seems more likely. [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2024). World Polychaeta Database. Vigtorniella zaikai (Kiseleva, 1992). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=129936 on 2024-06-03
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
(of Victoriella zaika Kiseleva, 1992) Kiseleva, M. I. 1992. [New genus and species of the family Chrysopetalidae (Polychaeta) from the Black Sea]. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 71(11): 128-132
, available online at http://www.tmbl.gu.se/staff/ThomasDahlgren/Trans/Kiseleva_1992.html [details] Available for editors [request]
basis of record Bellan, G. (2001). Polychaeta, <i>in</i>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 214-231. (look up in IMIS) [details]
redescription Watson, Charlotte; Carvajal, Jose Ignacio; Sergeeva, Nelly G.; Pleijel, Fred; Rouse, Greg W. (2016). Free-living calamyzin chrysopetalids (Annelida) from methane seeps, anoxic basins, and whale falls. <em>Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society.</em> 177(4): 700-719., available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12390
page(s): 706; note: redescription from non-type specimens [details] Available for editors [request]
[request] basis of record Bellan, G. (2001). Polychaeta, <i>in</i>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 214-231. (look up in IMIS) [details]
redescription Watson, Charlotte; Carvajal, Jose Ignacio; Sergeeva, Nelly G.; Pleijel, Fred; Rouse, Greg W. (2016). Free-living calamyzin chrysopetalids (Annelida) from methane seeps, anoxic basins, and whale falls. <em>Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society.</em> 177(4): 700-719., available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12390
page(s): 706; note: redescription from non-type specimens [details] Available for editors
[request] 
Present Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Spelling Currently waiting to verify if Kiseleva (1992) used 'zaika' as the spelling originally as is indicated in Zoological Record. If so then 'zaikai' is an incorrect subsequent spelling. He may have used both spellings, which would be evidence of a lapsus. [details]Type material Watson et al (2016) state that "note type material not available for loan (Zoologicheskiy Institut RAN, Saint Petersburg, Russia)." It is not clear whether this sentence means the type material is lost, or that it is simply only examinable at the named institute. The latter would be the literal interpretation of the words, but the former seems more likely. [details]
