WoRMS name details

Boeckia nasuta Grimm in G.O. Sars, 1894

873585  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:873585)

 unaccepted (nomen dubium)
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Not documented
Horton, T.; Lowry, J.; De Broyer, C.; Bellan-Santini, D.; Coleman, C.O.; Corbari, L.; Costello, M.J.; Daneliya, M.; Dauvin, J.-C.; Fišer, C.; Gasca, R.; Grabowski, M.; Guerra-García, J.M.; Hendrycks, E.; Hughes, L.; Jaume, D.; Jazdzewski, K.; Kim, Y.-H.; King, R.; Krapp-Schickel, T.; LeCroy, S.; Lörz, A.-N.; Mamos, T.; Senna, A.R.; Serejo, C.; Sket, B.; Souza-Filho, J.F.; Tandberg, A.H.; Thomas, J.D.; Thurston, M.; Vader, W.; Väinölä, R.; Vonk, R.; White, K.; Zeidler, W. (2020). World Amphipoda Database. Boeckia nasuta Grimm in G.O. Sars, 1894. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=873585 on 2021-01-20
Date
action
by
2016-04-13 14:28:07Z
created

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


basis of record Sars, G.O. (1894). Crustacea caspia. Contributions to the knowledge of the Carcinological Fauna of the Caspian Sea. Part III. Amphipoda. Gammarida. <em>Bulletin de l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de St.-Petersbourg, (Ser. 5).</em> 1: 179-223, 343-378; 16 pls., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/25216479#page/9/mode/1up [details]  OpenAccess publication 
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
 

From editor or global species database
Habitat Epigean [details]

Synonymy Besides the species described below [Boeckia spinosa], Dr. Grimm has distinguished 2 otlier species of this genus under the names B. nasuta and B. hystrix. Both these species are, however, founded upon quite immature specimens, the first-named agreeing exactly with young specimens of B. spinosa, as figured PI. II, fig. 10; and the other only differing in the dorsal prominences of the segments being somewhat stronger and elevated to acutely triangular projections. In my opinion both these supposed species ought to be withdrawn, the genus being at present only represented by a single species. [details]