WoRMS taxon details

Democrinus poculum (Döderlein, 1907)

723575  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:723575)

accepted
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
(of Bathycrinus poculum Döderlein, 1907) Döderlein L (1907) Die gestielten Crinoiden der Siboga-Expedition. Siboga Expeditie: Uitkomsten op zoologisch, botanisch, oceanographisch en geologisch Gebied, verzameld in Nederlandsch Oost-lndie 1899–1900, vol. 42a. Brill, Leiden. p. 1–54, fig. 1–12, pl. 1–23. [details]   
Taxonomic remark According to Michel Roux (personal communication, Nov 2019), poculum remains based on a single specimen consisting only of...  
Taxonomic remark According to Michel Roux (personal communication, Nov 2019), poculum remains based on a single specimen consisting only of the proximal stalk and basal ring and cannot be definitively attributed to a genus without the radial ring and arms. He recommends following Gislen's treatment as ?Democrinus[details]
Messing, C. (2020). World List of Crinoidea. Democrinus poculum (Döderlein, 1907). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=723575 on 2020-09-26
Date
action
by
2013-03-24 20:00:08Z
created
2019-11-16 15:15:14Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description  (of Bathycrinus poculum Döderlein, 1907) Döderlein L (1907) Die gestielten Crinoiden der Siboga-Expedition. Siboga Expeditie: Uitkomsten op zoologisch, botanisch, oceanographisch en geologisch Gebied, verzameld in Nederlandsch Oost-lndie 1899–1900, vol. 42a. Brill, Leiden. p. 1–54, fig. 1–12, pl. 1–23. [details]   

source of synonymy Gislén T (1938) A revision of the recent Bathycrinidae. <i>Lunds Universitets Årsskrift</i> (new series, part 2) 34(10):1–30, 18 fig. [details]   
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark According to Michel Roux (personal communication, Nov 2019), poculum remains based on a single specimen consisting only of the proximal stalk and basal ring and cannot be definitively attributed to a genus without the radial ring and arms. He recommends following Gislen's treatment as ?Democrinus[details]