WoRMS name details

Eulimella monolirata de Folin, 1874 sensu Peñas & Rolán, 1997

577040  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:577040)

 unaccepted (misidentification)
MolluscaBase (2018). Eulimella monolirata de Folin, 1874 sensu Peñas & Rolán, 1997. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=577040 on 2018-05-24
2011-07-15 13:08:16Z
2013-10-24 13:57:35Z
2014-03-21 16:25:08Z
2014-09-25 18:29:39Z

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

basis of record Peñas A. & Rolán E. (1997) La familia Pyramidellidae Gray, 1840 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Heterostropha) en Africa occidental. 2. Los géneros Turbonilla y Eulimella. Iberus suplemento 3: 1-105. [5 June 1997], available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/36325014 [details]   

additional source Peñas A. & Rolán E. 2002. La superfamilia Pyramidelloidea Gray, 1840 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Heterostropha) de Africa Occidental, 10. Addenda 2. Iberus, 20(1): 1-54., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/42358999 [details]   

additional source van Aartsen J.J., Gittenberger E. & Goud J. (2000). Pyramidellidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Heterobranchia) collected during the Dutch CANCAP and MAURITANIA expeditions in the south-eastern part of the North Atlantic Ocean (part 2). Zoologische Mededelingen (Leiden) 74 : 1-50, available online at http://www.repository.naturalis.nl/document/44074
page(s): 15; note: stated as synonym of E. gofasi (Schander, 1994), against Peñas et aal. (2014) who described it as new species.  [details]   

source of synonymy Peñas, A.; Rolán, E.; Swinnen, F. (2014). The superfamily Pyramidelloidea Gray, 1840 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Heterobranchia) in West Africa, 11. Addenda 3. Iberus. 32(2): 105-206.
page(s): 179 [details]   
From editor or global species database
Neotype Peñas & Rolán (1997) selected a neotype "for Eulimella monolirata De Folin, 1874", which presuambly refers to Aclis monolirata De Folin, 1873, from Hong Kong (not Noemia monolirata De Folin, 1873 (p. 180, also from Hong-Kong). This neotype designation is invalid because the authors did not state what steps they took to locate the type material, and because the selected specimen comes from Ghana, not Hong Kong. Van Aartsen et al. (2000) rejected the neotype and reidentified the specimen as Eulimella gofasi[details]