WoRMS taxon details
Floresorchestia anomala (Chevreux, 1901)
556110 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:556110)
accepted
Species
Orchestia anomala Chevreux, 1901 (basionym)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
(of Orchestia anomala Chevreux, 1901) Chevreux, E. (1901). Crustacés Amphipodes. Mission scientifique de M. Ch. Alluaud aux Iles Séchelles (Mars, Avril, Mai 1892). <em>Mémoires de La Société zoologique de France.</em> 14: 388-438. [details]

Type locality contained in Seychellois Exclusive Economic...
type locality contained in Seychellois Exclusive Economic Zone [from synonym] [view taxon] [details]
type locality contained in Seychelles [details]
type locality contained in Seychelles [details]
Horton, T.; Lowry, J.; De Broyer, C.; Bellan-Santini, D.; Coleman, C.O.; Corbari, L.; Costello, M.J.; Daneliya, M.; Dauvin, J.-C.; Fišer, C.; Gasca, R.; Grabowski, M.; Guerra-García, J.M.; Hendrycks, E.; Hughes, L.; Jaume, D.; Jazdzewski, K.; Kim, Y.-H.; King, R.; Krapp-Schickel, T.; LeCroy, S.; Lörz, A.-N.; Mamos, T.; Senna, A.R.; Serejo, C.; Sket, B.; Souza-Filho, J.F.; Tandberg, A.H.; Thomas, J.D.; Thurston, M.; Vader, W.; Väinölä, R.; Vonk, R.; White, K.; Zeidler, W. (2021). World Amphipoda Database. Floresorchestia anomala (Chevreux, 1901). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=556110 on 2021-01-26
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
(of Orchestia anomala Chevreux, 1901) Chevreux, E. (1901). Crustacés Amphipodes. Mission scientifique de M. Ch. Alluaud aux Iles Séchelles (Mars, Avril, Mai 1892). <em>Mémoires de La Société zoologique de France.</em> 14: 388-438. [details]





Syntype MNHN Am 4595-4596 [details]
From editor or global species database
Habitat Supralittoral beaches. [details]Remark The original description was based on one male and 3 females from Ronde Island and two males and four females from La Digue in the Seychelles. Chevreux (1901) does not give the length of the male he described, but he does say that the largest female (ovigerous and 10 mm in length) was notably larger than the largest male. This leaves the possibility that the males were not completely mature. [details]