WoRMS name details

Ocypode citharoedicus Say, 1817

454186  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:454186)

 unaccepted (unavailable name)
Species
marine
Nomenclature This name is NOT available as Linnaeus never even proposed it as a provisional name. His text makes it clear he had changed...  
Nomenclature This name is NOT available as Linnaeus never even proposed it as a provisional name. His text makes it clear he had changed his mind and not named it. So this name has no nomenclatural significance, regardless of its historical value. It is not even a nomen nudum as the name was never actually used. [details]
WoRMS (2018). Ocypode citharoedicus Say, 1817. Accessed at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=454186 on 2018-02-19
Date
action
by
2010-02-10 15:10:57Z
created
2010-02-25 15:41:33Z
changed
2015-11-30 14:16:49Z
changed
2017-02-09 18:08:23Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


basis of record Say, T. (1817). An account of the Crustacea of the United States. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 1(1):57-63, 65-80 (pl.), 97-101, 155-169 (1817); 1(2): 235-253, 313-319, 374-401, 423-441 (1818). (Copepoda: 436-441, ix-1818)., available online at https://ia600706.us.archive.org/14/items/cbarchive_47684_anaccountofthecrustaceaoftheun1817/anaccountofthecrustaceaoftheun1817.pdf
page(s): 71-73 [details]  OpenAccess publication 

additional source Shih, H.-T.; Ng, P. K. L.; Davie, P. J. F.; Schubart, C. D.; Türkay, M.; Naderloo, R.; Jones, D. S.; Liu, M.-Y. (2016). Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, (Raffles Bull. Zool.). 64: 139-175. [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
From editor or global species database
Nomenclature This name is NOT available as Linnaeus never even proposed it as a provisional name. His text makes it clear he had changed his mind and not named it. So this name has no nomenclatural significance, regardless of its historical value. It is not even a nomen nudum as the name was never actually used. [details]