WoRMS name details

Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorOcypode citharoedicus Say, 1817

454186 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:454186)
Unaccepted: synonym, or anything that is not accepted unaccepted (unavailable name)
Species
marine
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorNomenclature This name is NOT available as Linnaeus never...  
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorNomenclature This name is NOT available as Linnaeus never even proposed it as a provisional name. His text makes it clear he had changed his mind and not named it. So this name has no nomenclatural significance, regardless of its historical value. It is not even a nomen nudum as the name was never actually used. [details]
Davie, P.; Ng, P. (2017). Ocypode citharoedicus Say, 1817. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=454186 on 2017-11-23

Date
action
by
2010-02-10 15:10:57Z
created
2010-02-25 15:41:33Z
changed
2015-11-30 14:16:49Z
changed
2017-02-09 18:08:23Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License



basis of record Say, T. (1817). An account of the Crustacea of the United States. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 1(1):57-63, 65-80 (pl.), 97-101, 155-169 (1817); 1(2): 235-253, 313-319, 374-401, 423-441 (1818). (Copepoda: 436-441, ix-1818)., available online at https://ia600706.us.archive.org/14/items/cbarchive_47684_anaccountofthecrustaceaoftheun1817/anaccountofthecrustaceaoftheun1817.pdf
page(s): 71-73 [details]  OpenAccess publication 

additional source Shih, H.-T.; Ng, P. K. L.; Davie, P. J. F.; Schubart, C. D.; Türkay, M.; Naderloo, R.; Jones, D. S.; Liu, M.-Y. (2016). Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, (Raffles Bull. Zool.). 64: 139-175. [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
From editor or global species database
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorNomenclature This name is NOT available as Linnaeus never even proposed it as a provisional name. His text makes it clear he had changed his mind and not named it. So this name has no nomenclatural significance, regardless of its historical value. It is not even a nomen nudum as the name was never actually used. [details]