WoRMS taxon details

Dioithona Kiefer, 1935

346356  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:346356)

accepted
Genus
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
Not documented
Taxonomy Vervoort (1964) believes that the creation of this genus rests on a character that is too restrictive and suggests to...  
Taxonomy Vervoort (1964) believes that the creation of this genus rests on a character that is too restrictive and suggests to consider it only as a subgenus of Oithona. This opinion is followed by Wellershaus (1970) who reviews several characters in some Oithona species. Shuvalov (1980, p.86, 169) considers the genus as justified. Meanwhile, after examination of the males and on the basis of a phylogenetic analysis (Abiahy, 2000), Boxshall & Hasley (2004, p.611) restore the validity of the genus Dioithona. 4 spp. (+ 1 doubtful). [details]
Walter, T.C. & Boxshall, G. (2018). World of Copepods database. Dioithona Kiefer, 1935. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=346356 on 2018-06-18
Date
action
by
2008-07-09 09:00:28Z
created
2015-05-11 06:37:22Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


basis of record Walter, Chad. The world of Copepods. , available online at http://www.marinespecies.org/copepoda [details]   
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Type locality 
From regional or thematic species database
Taxonomy Vervoort (1964) believes that the creation of this genus rests on a character that is too restrictive and suggests to consider it only as a subgenus of Oithona. This opinion is followed by Wellershaus (1970) who reviews several characters in some Oithona species. Shuvalov (1980, p.86, 169) considers the genus as justified. Meanwhile, after examination of the males and on the basis of a phylogenetic analysis (Abiahy, 2000), Boxshall & Hasley (2004, p.611) restore the validity of the genus Dioithona. 4 spp. (+ 1 doubtful). [details]