WoRMS name details

Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorArtacamella Hartman, 1955

325288  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:325288)

Unaccepted: synonym, or anything that is not accepted unaccepted (subjective synonym)
Genus
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Hartman, O. 1955. Endemism in the North Pacific Ocean, with emphasis on the distribution of marine annelids, and descriptions of new or little known species. 39-60. IN: Allan, Hancock Foundation (Ed.). Essays in the Natural Sciences in Honor of Captain Allan Hancock on the occasion of his birthday July 26, 1955: Los Angeles, University of Southern California Press.
page(s): 48-49 [details]   
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorEtymology Not stated. The generic name is formed by the...  
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorEtymology Not stated. The generic name is formed by the name of the similar genus Artacama Malmgren, 1866, followed by the Latin suffix -ella, feminine of -ellus and added to a noun to form a diminuitive of that noun, and presumably refers to the smaller size of the new genus, with 15 chaetigerous segments, in relation to the similar genus Artacama, with 17.  [details]
Read, G.; Gil, J. (2017). Artacamella Hartman, 1955. In: Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2017). World Polychaeta database. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at http://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=325288 on 2017-12-18

Date
action
by
2008-03-05 14:39:51Z
created
2008-03-26 11:36:43Z
changed
2015-12-11 11:32:50Z
changed
2016-01-17 12:56:13Z
changed
2017-03-14 00:29:34Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Hartman, O. 1955. Endemism in the North Pacific Ocean, with emphasis on the distribution of marine annelids, and descriptions of new or little known species. 39-60. IN: Allan, Hancock Foundation (Ed.). Essays in the Natural Sciences in Honor of Captain Allan Hancock on the occasion of his birthday July 26, 1955: Los Angeles, University of Southern California Press.
page(s): 48-49 [details]   

additional source Glasby, C.J.; Read, G.B.; Lee, K.E.; Blakemore, R.J.; Fraser, P.M.; Pinder, A.M.; Erséus, C.; Moser, W.E.; Burreson, E.M.; Govedich, F.R.; Davies, R.W.; Dawson, E.W. (2009). Phylum Annelida: bristleworms, earthworms, leeches, in: Gordon, D.P. (Ed.) (2009). New Zealand inventory of biodiversity: 1. Kingdom Animalia: Radiata, Lophotrochozoa, Deuterostomia. pp. 312-358. [details]   

source of synonymy Garraffoni, Andre Rinaldo Senna; Lana, Paulo da Cunha. (2004). Cladistic analysis of the subfamily Trichobranchinae (Polychaeta: Terebellidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 84(5): 973-982., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315404010264h
page(s): 981; note: to subjective synonym of Trichobranchus [details]   

status source Holthe, Torleif. (1977). The systematic position of Artacamella Hartman, 1955 (Polychaeta, Terebellomorpha). Sarsia. 63: 35-37., available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/00364827.1977.10411319 [details]   

emendation (re-diagnosis of genus) Hutchings, P.; Peart, R. (2000). A revision of the Australian Trichobranchidae (Polychaeta). Invertebrate Systematics. 14(2): 225-272., available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/IT98005
page(s): 226 [details]   
From editor or global species database
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorEtymology Not stated. The generic name is formed by the name of the similar genus Artacama Malmgren, 1866, followed by the Latin suffix -ella, feminine of -ellus and added to a noun to form a diminuitive of that noun, and presumably refers to the smaller size of the new genus, with 15 chaetigerous segments, in relation to the similar genus Artacama, with 17.  [details]

Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorSynonymy Garraffoni & Lana (2012) formally subjectively synonymised Artacamella into Trichobranchus. The authors do not use new combination Trichobranchus hancocki, but it is the type of the genus they synonymised so logically it automatically moves to Trichobranchus. The status of the other species included is uncertain as Garraffoni & Lana did not formally appraise whether they belong in Trichobranchus. [details]