WoRMS taxon details

Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorPseudolacydonia Rullier, 1964

324600

urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:324600

Unaccepted: synonym, or anything that is not accepted unaccepted (subjective synonym)
Genus
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Rullier, Francois 1964. Resultats scientifique des campagne de la 'Calypso': Iles du Cap Vert. 5. Annélides Polychètes. Annales de l'Institut océanographique, 41(6): 113-218.
page(s): 151 [details]   
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTaxonomy As the name indicates, Pseudolacydonia was...  
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTaxonomy As the name indicates, Pseudolacydonia was first placed in Lacydoniidae alongside Lacydonia. Blake (1994:188) first suggested it was wrongly placed there and referred it informally to the goniadids. Böggemann (2002) examined the type and placed it as a glycerid. [details]
Read, G. (2012). Pseudolacydonia Rullier, 1964. In: Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2017). World Polychaeta database. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=324600 on 2017-11-20

Date
action
by
2008-03-05 14:39:51Z
created
2008-03-26 11:36:43Z
changed
2012-08-03 01:36:29Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License



original description Rullier, Francois 1964. Resultats scientifique des campagne de la 'Calypso': Iles du Cap Vert. 5. Annélides Polychètes. Annales de l'Institut océanographique, 41(6): 113-218.
page(s): 151 [details]   

source of synonymy Böggemann, M. (2002). Revision of the Glyceridae Grube 1859 (Annelida: Polychaeta). Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen naturforschenden Gesellschaft. 555: 1-249., available online at http://www.schweizerbart.de/publications/list/series/abh_senck
page(s): 78 [details]   
From editor or global species database
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTaxonomy As the name indicates, Pseudolacydonia was first placed in Lacydoniidae alongside Lacydonia. Blake (1994:188) first suggested it was wrongly placed there and referred it informally to the goniadids. Böggemann (2002) examined the type and placed it as a glycerid. [details]