WoRMS name details

Streblosoma intestinalis [auct. misspelling]

152300  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:152300)

 unaccepted (incorrect subsequent spelling (gender agreement))
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2018). World Polychaeta database. Streblosoma intestinalis [auct. misspelling]. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=152300 on 2018-05-28
2005-04-11 07:51:31Z
2013-01-04 16:36:35Z
2016-01-28 02:19:35Z
2016-01-28 20:26:04Z

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

basis of record Wollebaek, Alf. (1912 (for 1911 year)). Nordeuropaeiske annulata Polychaeta I. Ammocharidae, Amphictenidae, Ampharetidae, Terebellidae og Serpulidae. Skrifter utgit av Videnskapsselskapet i Kristiania. I, Matematisk-naturvidenskabelig klasse. year 1911 part 2 no 18: 1-144., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12042491
page(s): 87; note: record and description using 'intestinalis' spelling [details]   

additional source de Kluijver, M.J.; Ingalsuo, S.S.; van Nieuwenhuijzen, A.J.L.; Veldhuijzen van Zanten, H.H. (2000). Macrobenthos of the North Sea [CD-ROM]: 2. Keys to Polychaeta, Nemertina, Sipuncula, Platyhelminthes and miscellaneous worm-like groups. World Biodiversity Database CD-ROM Series. Expert Center for Taxonomic Identification (ETI): Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ISBN 3-540-14808-6. 1 cd-rom pp. (look up in IMIS[details]   

additional source Hessle, Christian. (1917). Zur Kenntnis der terebellomorphen Polychaeten. Zoologiska bidrag från Uppsala. 5: 39-258, plates I-V., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/38891407
page(s): 210; note: misspelling (gender variant) of 'intestinale' by Hessle [details]   
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien 

From editor or global species database
Authority Wollebaek (1911) and Hessle (1917) at least used this spelling variant. Streblosoma is neuter whereas 'intestinalis' is a masculine suffix form. Although as yet lacking advice from a Latin scholar on the suffix the assumption must be that 'intestinale' is a neuter form and does not need to be corrected to 'intestinalis'. [details]