WoRMS name details

Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorNamakosiramia Ho & Perkins, 1977

149988 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:149988)
Unaccepted: synonym, or anything that is not accepted unaccepted (synonym according to Huys, 2009)
Genus
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTaxonomy Ho and Perkins (1977: 368) proposed the genus...  
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTaxonomy Ho and Perkins (1977: 368) proposed the genus Namakosiramia Ho & Perkins, 1977 for a new species N. californiensis Ho & Perkins, 1977 (type by original designation) and established the family Namakosiramiidae in the order Siphonostomatoida to accommodate it. Huys (1988a: 1520, 1522) placed the family in the order Harpacticoida and relegated it to a junior subjective synonym of the family Laophontidae T. Scott, 1905a. Kim (1991: 429) added a second species, N. koreensis Kim, 1991, to the genus.
Brady (1918: 34), in a brief supplementary note to his report on the Copepoda collected during the Australasian Antarctic Expedition 1911–1914, proposed the genus Microchelonia for a single species, M. glacialis Brady, 1918 (type by monotypy). The genus was not mentioned in Lang’s (1948) monograph and does not feature in the Nomenclator Zoologicus (Neave 2005). It was listed as a genus inquirendum by Boxshall and Halsey (2004: 844) but without ordinal or familial assignment. Although Brady (1918: 34) stated that M. glacialis may “...form the type of an entirely new division of the Copepoda...”, the illustration of the first leg (labelled as the “anterior antenna”; Plate 15, Fig. 4) indicates that Microchelonia is a member of the harpacticoid family Laophontidae. The general dorso-ventrally depressed habitus, the shape of the P1 endopod (and claw), the powerful P2 (shown in the habitus drawings; Plate 15, Figs 1–2), the reduced P2–P3 (labelled as “posterior antenna”; Plate 15, Fig. 5) and P5 (labelled as “maxilliped”; Plate 15, Fig. 6), and the short caudal rami bearing one long principal seta unequivocally identify M. glacialis as a member of the genus Namakosiramia which should consequently sink as a junior objective synonym of Microchelonia Brady, 1918. The genus contains three species: M. glacialis, M. californiensis (Ho & Perkins, 1977) comb. nov. and M. koreensis (Kim, 1991) comb. nov.
 [details]
Walter, T. Chad; Boxshall, G. (2015). Namakosiramia. In: Walter, T.C. & Boxshall, G. (2017). World of Copepods database. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=149988 on 2017-11-21

Date
action
by
2005-04-01 08:32:29Z
created
2010-07-28 20:41:46Z
checked
2010-11-29 19:48:03Z
changed
2015-09-03 06:24:32Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License



basis of record Bodin, P. (1997). Catalogue of the new marine harpacticoid copepods. 1997 edition. Studiedocumenten van het K.B.I.N. = Documents de Travail de l'I.R.Sc.N.B., 89. Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen: Brussels, Belgium. 304 pp. (look up in IMIS[details]   

additional source Huys, R. (2009). Unresolved cases of type fixation, synonymy and homonymy in harpacticoid copepod nomenclature (Crustacea: Copepoda). Zootaxa. 2183:1-99., available online at http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2009/2/zt02183p099.pdf [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
From editor or global species database
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTaxonomy Ho and Perkins (1977: 368) proposed the genus Namakosiramia Ho & Perkins, 1977 for a new species N. californiensis Ho & Perkins, 1977 (type by original designation) and established the family Namakosiramiidae in the order Siphonostomatoida to accommodate it. Huys (1988a: 1520, 1522) placed the family in the order Harpacticoida and relegated it to a junior subjective synonym of the family Laophontidae T. Scott, 1905a. Kim (1991: 429) added a second species, N. koreensis Kim, 1991, to the genus.
Brady (1918: 34), in a brief supplementary note to his report on the Copepoda collected during the Australasian Antarctic Expedition 1911–1914, proposed the genus Microchelonia for a single species, M. glacialis Brady, 1918 (type by monotypy). The genus was not mentioned in Lang’s (1948) monograph and does not feature in the Nomenclator Zoologicus (Neave 2005). It was listed as a genus inquirendum by Boxshall and Halsey (2004: 844) but without ordinal or familial assignment. Although Brady (1918: 34) stated that M. glacialis may “...form the type of an entirely new division of the Copepoda...”, the illustration of the first leg (labelled as the “anterior antenna”; Plate 15, Fig. 4) indicates that Microchelonia is a member of the harpacticoid family Laophontidae. The general dorso-ventrally depressed habitus, the shape of the P1 endopod (and claw), the powerful P2 (shown in the habitus drawings; Plate 15, Figs 1–2), the reduced P2–P3 (labelled as “posterior antenna”; Plate 15, Fig. 5) and P5 (labelled as “maxilliped”; Plate 15, Fig. 6), and the short caudal rami bearing one long principal seta unequivocally identify M. glacialis as a member of the genus Namakosiramia which should consequently sink as a junior objective synonym of Microchelonia Brady, 1918. The genus contains three species: M. glacialis, M. californiensis (Ho & Perkins, 1977) comb. nov. and M. koreensis (Kim, 1991) comb. nov.
 [details]