Alatotrochus Cairns, 1994 (additional source)
Aulocyathus Marenzeller, 1904 (additional source)
Bathelia Moseley, 1880 (basis of record)
Bathyactis Moseley, 1880 accepted as
Fungiacyathus (Bathyactis) Moseley, 1880 (additional source)
Bourneotrochus Wells, 1984 (additional source)
Caryophyllia Lamarck, 1801 (additional source)
Caryophyllia (Acanthocyathus) Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Citharocyathus Alcock, 1902 accepted as
Notocyathus Tenison-Woods, 1880 (basis of record)
Cladocoridae Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857 (basis of record)
Coenocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Coenosmilia Pourtalès, 1874 (additional source)
Concentrotheca Cairns, 1979 (additional source)
Conotrochus Seguenza, 1864 (additional source)
Crispatotrochus Tenison-Woods, 1878 (additional source)
Cryptotrochus Cairns, 1988 (additional source)
Cyathelia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849 (additional source)
Cyathoceras Moseley, 1880 accepted as
Crispatotrochus Tenison-Woods, 1878 (basis of record)
Cyathotrochus Bourne, 1905 (additional source)
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Dasmosmilia Pourtalès, 1880 (additional source)
Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932 accepted as
Peponocyathus Gravier, 1915 (additional source)
Deltocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Desmophyllum Ehrenberg, 1834 (additional source)
Dunocyathus Tenison-Woods, 1878 (additional source)
Endopachys Lonsdale, 1845 (additional source)
Ericiocyathus Cairns & Zibrowius, 1997 (additional source)
Fungiacyathus Sars, 1872 (additional source)
Goniocorella Yabe & Eguchi, 1932 (additional source)
Idiotrochus Wells, 1935 (additional source)
Kionotrochus Dennant, 1906 (additional source)
Labyrinthocyathus Cairns, 1979 (additional source)
Leptopenus Moseley, 1880 (additional source)
Letepsammia Yabe & Eguchi, 1932 (additional source)
Lochmaeotrochus Alcock, 1902 (additional source)
Lophelia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849 accepted as
Desmophyllum Ehrenberg, 1834 (additional source)
Madrepora Linnaeus, 1758 (additional source)
Monohedotrochus Kitahara & Cairns, 2005 (basis of record)
Notocyathus Tenison-Woods, 1880 (additional source)
Oxysmilia Duchassaing, 1870 (additional source)
Paraconotrochus Cairns & Parker, 1992 (additional source)
Paracyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Peponocyathus Gravier, 1915 (additional source)
Phacelocyathus Cairns, 1979 (additional source)
Phyllangia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Platytrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Pleotrochus Cairns, 1997 (additional source)
Pourtalopsammia Cairns, 2001 (additional source)
Premocyathus Yabe & Eguchi, 1942 (additional source)
Rhizosmilia Cairns, 1978 (additional source)
Rhombopsammia Owens, 1986 (additional source)
Sabinotrochus Duncan, 1873 accepted as
Stephanocyathus Seguenza, 1864 (basis of record)
Solenosmilia Duncan, 1873 (additional source)
Stephanocyathus Seguenza, 1864 (additional source)
Stephanocyathus (Acinocyathus) Wells, 1984 (basis of record)
Stephanocyathus (Odontocyathus) Moseley, 1880 (basis of record)
Stephanophyllia Michelin, 1841 (additional source)
Stephanotrochus Moseley, 1880 accepted as
Stephanocyathus Seguenza, 1864 (basis of record)
Sympodangia Cairns & Zibrowius, 1997 (additional source)
Tethocyathus Kühn, 1933 (additional source)
Thalamophyllia Duchassaing, 1870 (additional source)
Thrypticotrochus Cairns, 1989 (additional source)
Trematotrochus Tenison-Woods, 1879 (additional source)
Tropidocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Vaughanella Gravier, 1915 (additional source)
Antarctica for
Tropidocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
Australasia for
Acropora Oken, 1815
Australasia for
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
Australasia for
Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932
Australasia for
Idiotrochus Wells, 1935
Australasia for
Peponocyathus Gravier, 1915
Australasia for
Platytrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
Australasia for
Trematotrochus Tenison-Woods, 1879
Caribbean Sea for
Acropora Oken, 1815
Caribbean Sea for
Acropora Oken, 1815
Central America for
Acropora Oken, 1815
Central Europe for
Acropora Oken, 1815
Central Europe for
Bathycyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
Central Europe for
Leptocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1850 †
Central Europe for
Notocyathus Tenison-Woods, 1880
Central Europe for
Parasmilia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 †
Central Europe for
Thecocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 †
Central Pacific Ocean for
Acropora Oken, 1815
Central Pacific Ocean for
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
East Asia for
Acropora Oken, 1815
East Asia for
Alatotrochus Cairns, 1994
East Asia for
Cyathotrochus Bourne, 1905
East Asia for
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
East Asia for
Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932
East Asia for
Peponocyathus Gravier, 1915
East Asia for
Tropidocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
East Europe for
Acropora Oken, 1815
East Europe for
Ceratotrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
East Europe for
Parasmilia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 †
East Europe for
Tethocyathus Kühn, 1933
East Pacific for
Acropora Oken, 1815
East Pacific for
Bathycyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
Indian Ocean for
Acropora Oken, 1815
Indian Ocean for
Cyathotrochus Bourne, 1905
Indian Ocean for
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
Indian Ocean for
Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932
Indian Ocean for
Thrypticotrochus Cairns, 1989
Indian Ocean for
Tropidocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
Melanesia for
Acropora Oken, 1815
Melanesia for
Cyathotrochus Bourne, 1905
Melanesia for
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
Melanesia for
Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932
Micronesia for
Acropora Oken, 1815
Micronesia for
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
Micronesia for
Notocyathus Tenison-Woods, 1880
North Africa for
Acropora Oken, 1815
North Africa for
Ceratotrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
North Africa for
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
North Africa for
Parasmilia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 †
North America for
Acropora Oken, 1815
North America for
Bathycyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
North America for
Parasmilia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 †
North America for
Platytrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
Polynesia for
Acropora Oken, 1815
Polynesia for
Cyathotrochus Bourne, 1905
Polynesia for
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
South America for
Acropora Oken, 1815
South Asia for
Acropora Oken, 1815
South Asia for
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
South Asia for
Leptocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1850 †
South Asia for
Tropidocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
South East Asia for
Acropora Oken, 1815
South East Asia for
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
South East Asia for
Thecocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 †
South Europe for
Acropora Oken, 1815
South Europe for
Ceratotrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
South Europe for
Leptocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1850 †
South Europe for
Thecocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 †
Sub-Saharan Africa for
Acropora Oken, 1815
Sub-Saharan Africa for
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
West Asia for
Acropora Oken, 1815
West Asia for
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
West Atlantic for
Acropora Oken, 1815
West Atlantic for
Cryptotrochus Cairns, 1988
West Atlantic for
Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932
West Atlantic for
Leptocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1850 †
West Atlantic for
Peponocyathus Gravier, 1915
West Atlantic for
Trematotrochus Tenison-Woods, 1879
West Europe for
Acropora Oken, 1815
West Europe for
Ceratotrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
West Europe for
Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932
West Europe for
Peponocyathus Gravier, 1915
West Europe for
Thecocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 †
West Indian Ocean for
Acropora Oken, 1815
West Indian Ocean for
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
West Pacific for
Acropora Oken, 1815
West Pacific for
Alatotrochus Cairns, 1994
West Pacific for
Cryptotrochus Cairns, 1988
West Pacific for
Cyathotrochus Bourne, 1905
West Pacific for
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
West Pacific for
Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932
West Pacific for
Dunocyathus Tenison-Woods, 1878
West Pacific for
Idiotrochus Wells, 1935
West Pacific for
Kionotrochus Dennant, 1906
West Pacific for
Notocyathus Tenison-Woods, 1880
West Pacific for
Peponocyathus Gravier, 1915
West Pacific for
Platytrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
West Pacific for
Pleotrochus Cairns, 1997
West Pacific for
Thrypticotrochus Cairns, 1989
West Pacific for
Trematotrochus Tenison-Woods, 1879
Syntype NHMUK, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Spain, 1..., identified as
Solenosmilia variabilis Duncan, 1873
Holotype NHMUK, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Portugal..., identified as
Sabinotrochus apertus Duncan, 1873
Syntype NHMW, verbatimGeounit Pliocene: Sicily, It..., identified as
Conotrochus typus Seguenza, 1864
Lectotype MCZ, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Florida,..., identified as
Thecopsammia tintinnabulum Pourtalès, 1868
Holotype , verbatimGeounit Recent: Mediterranea..., identified as
Madrepora oculata Linnaeus, 1758
Holotype MNHN, verbatimGeounit Unknown (probably Me..., identified as
Coenocyathus cylindricus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
Syntype NHMUK, verbatimGeounit Recent; off Rio de l..., identified as
Bathelia candida Moseley, 1880
Holotype MNHN, verbatimGeounit Recent: Martinique, ..., identified as
Phyllangia americana Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849
Holotype MOM, verbatimGeounit Gulf of Gascogne, 43..., identified as
Bathytrochus hexagonus Gravier, 1915
Syntype MCZ, verbatimGeounit Recent: Strait of Fl..., identified as
Amphihelia rostrata Pourtalès, 1878
Syntype MOM, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Newfound..., identified as
Caryophyllia margaritata Jourdan, 1895
Unknown type NHMW, verbatimGeounit Pleistocene: Messina..., identified as
Stephanocyathus elegans Seguenza, 1864
Holotype , verbatimGeounit Recent; off Havana, ..., identified as
Anthemiphyllia patera Pourtalès, 1878
Syntype NHMUK 1880.11.25.156-157, verbatimGeounit Recent: Philippines ..., identified as
Stephanophyllia formosissima Moseley, 1876
Lectotype NHMUK 1880.11.25.55, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Recife, ..., identified as
Ceratotrochus diadema Moseley, 1876
Lectotype NHMUK 1880.11.25.59, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Rio de l..., identified as
Cyathoceras cornu Moseley, 1880
Syntype NHMUK 1939.7.20.430-431, verbatimGeounit Recent; off Cuba, 11..., identified as
Trochopsammia infundibulum Pourtalès, 1878
Holotype MOVI 24049, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Brazil, ..., identified as
Monohedotrochus capitolii Kitahara & Cairns, 2005
Syntype MCZ 2761, 5622, identified as
Coenosmilia arbuscula Pourtalès, 1874
Syntype MCZ 2767, verbatimGeounit Recent; Strait of Fl..., identified as
Fungia symmetrica Pourtalès, 1871
Holotype MCZ 2769, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Florida,..., identified as
Platytrochus coronatus Pourtalès, 1867
Syntype MCZ 2772, 5609, verbatimGeounit Recent: Strait of Fl..., identified as
Thecocyathus laevigatus Pourtalès, 1871
Holotype USNM 46812, verbatimGeounit Recent: Strait of Fl..., identified as
Rhizosmilia gerdae Cairns, 1978
Holotype USNM 46871, verbatimGeounit Recent: northern Str..., identified as
Labyrinthocyathus langae Cairns, 1979
Syntype MCZ 5442, 2752, verbatimGeounit off Florida, 220-229..., identified as
Dendrophyllia cornucopia De Pourtalès, 1871
Holotype MCZ 5601, 2773 (39), verbatimGeounit off Florida Keys, 21..., identified as
Thecopsammia socialis Pourtalès, 1868
Syntype TIUS 60747, verbatimGeounit Pleistocene: Ryukyu,..., identified as
Premocyathus compressus Yabe & Eguchi, 1942
Syntype ZMA 700 and 814, verbatimGeounit Recent: Indonesia, 4..., identified as
Lochmaeotrochus oculeus Alcock, 1902
Holotype USNM 72797, verbatimGeounit Recent; : 9 38’30”N,..., identified as
Rhombopsammia squiresi Owens, 1986
Syntype NHMUK 80.11.25.158-159, verbatimGeounit Recent: southern Ind..., identified as
Leptopenus discus Moseley, 1880
Holotype USNM 81901, verbatimGeounit Recent; Sulu Archipe..., identified as
Thrypticotrochus multilobatus Cairns, 1989
Holotype USNM 97168, verbatimGeounit Recent: Sulu Sea, Ph..., identified as
Ericiocyathus echinatus Cairns & Zibrowius, 1997
Holotype USNM 97308, verbatimGeounit Recent: Samar Sea, P..., identified as
Sympodangia albatrossi Cairns & Zibrowius, 1997
Syntype NHM B626, verbatimGeounit Recent; Lofoten, Nor..., identified as
Fungiacyathus fragilis Sars, 1872
Syntype ZMA Coel. 1185, verbatimGeounit Recent; Sulu Sea, 52..., identified as
Citharocyathus conicus Alcock, 1902
Syntype NMV F41513, verbatimGeounit Recent: Great Barrie..., identified as
Kionotrochus suteri Dennant, 1906
Holotype SAMA H520, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Tasmania..., identified as
Paraconotrochus zeidleri Cairns & Parker, 1992
Syntype MOM Unknown, verbatimGeounit Recent: Azores, 650-..., identified as
Peponocyathus variabilis Gravier, 1915
Comparison
The genus forms a paraphyly on the morphological phylogeny. On the molecular tree, Acanthastrea possesses several ... [details]
Comparison
Like Acanthogyra but columella absent and corallites are generally in a greater variety of integration types ... [details]
Comparison
Axial corallites are also seen in some species of Isopora, but with supplementary or multiple axials, and in one ... [details]
Comparison
In skeleton structure (confluent and regularly porous radial elements, synapticulae, endotheca) similar to ... [details]
Comparison
Actinaraeopsis is similar to Actinaraea d’Orbigny in structural septal porosity and tabuloid endotheca. The ... [details]
Comparison
The type material of the genus Actinastraeopsis Sikharulidze, 1977, as originally documented in Sikharulidze (1977, ... [details]
Comparison
Material described from the Middle Jurassic of India (Patcham Fm, Jumara Dome) as Lophosmilia tenuicaulata ... [details]
Comparison
From Astraeomorpha Reuss, 1854, the genus differs in 2-4 times larger diameters of trabeculae, pennular septal ... [details]
Comparison
Like Floriastrea Turnsek but polyps in less varibale integration types (only cerioid) and circumoral budding ... [details]
Comparison
Superficial resemblance of this genus to Oedalmia Cuif and Lupitschia Cuif (recte Thamnasteriamorpha Melnikova) was ... [details]
Comparison
Differs from <i>Pleotrochus</i> in having edge crests and lacking pali. [details]
Comparison
In cerioid type of colony, small corallites, styliform columella the genus is the most similar to Stephanastrea ... [details]
Comparison
Like Archeosmilia, but strongly bilateral. [details]
Comparison
From Stuoresimorpha Roniewicz, 1989 differs in open series and the presence of the septum–of-valley [details]
Comparison
From Alpinophyllia Roniewicz and Stuoresimorpha Roniewicz differs in thamnasterioid type of colony and thin septa ... [details]
Comparison
Differs from Laminocyathus in having a papillose columella. [details]
Comparison
The genus seems to be very close of Isastrea. The ornamentation of septa with flattened granules could be a ... [details]
Comparison
Oyonnaxastraea has a thicker wall and an axially thickened major septum but could range in the variability of ... [details]
Comparison
From cerioid Pleurostylina de Fromentel, 1856 and Amphiastrea Etallon, 1859 differs in having wide dissepimentarium ... [details]
Comparison
The genus is highly similar to Barremian-Aptian Rhipidomeandra Morycowa and Masse, 1998, family ... [details]
Comparison
From other meandroid Triassic corals differs in short septa, lack of columella and mixed septal micromorphology ... [details]
Comparison
In contrast to the original documentation by Alloiteau (1941, p. 31, pl. 11, fig. 4, pl. 12, figs 4-5), the genus ... [details]
Comparison
Similar to Asterosmilia but budding daughter corallites from edge zone. [details]
Comparison
From Coccophyllum it differs in having septal spines arranged in a half-fan and dissepimental endotheca, while in ... [details]
Comparison
Antiguastrea is morphologically most similar to Tarbellastraea; both genera are plocoid with extracalicular budding, ... [details]
Comparison
Some morphological transitions can be considered with solitary forms – Rhipidogyra – and massive meandroid ... [details]
Comparison
No similar corals are known up to now. [details]
Comparison
Like Actinastrea, Astrocoenia and correlate genera but differing by to have parietal columella formed by trabecular ... [details]
Comparison
Gregory has compared this genus with Thamnastraea from which it differs mainly by absence of columella. Gregory’s ... [details]
Comparison
In the corallite structure, the genus is similar to phaceloid Archaeosmiliopsis Melnikova, 1975. In its shape and ... [details]
Comparison
From related genus Archaeosmilia Melnikova differs in phaceloid growth form. [details]
Comparison
From thamnasterioid, small-corallite genus Seriastraea Schaefer et Senowbari-Daryan, Astraeomorpha differs in ... [details]
Comparison
Differs from Hoplangia in having entire axial edges of septa dentate. [details]
Comparison
Astrea rotulosa has not been been placed on the molecular phylogeny, but it is most similar to A. devantieri. Each ... [details]
Comparison
having thick, compact costosepta and a well-developed exothecal wall, the material figured from the Aptian of ... [details]
Comparison
Wells, 1956 considered Mitrodendron as a senior synonym but Mitrodendron is generally considered as more clearly ... [details]
Comparison
Similar to Conotrochus, but having residual parent fragment attached to base. [details]
Comparison
Similar to Peponocyathus, but differs in having a rudimentary columella, and multiple paliform lobes per septum [details]
Comparison
As suggested by the original description (Veron and Pichon, 1982: 138), it shares almost all characters with ... [details]
Comparison
Three autapomorphies, all macromorphological traits, unambiguously define this monotypic genus: exclusively ... [details]
Comparison
Like Fungiastrea, Pseudoseris, Polyastreopsis, Eugyropsis, Eugyra and Diplothecophyllia but differing by the ... [details]
Comparison
Like Microphyllia, but differing by the columella and the closed valleys. Like Comophyllia but differing by the ... [details]
Comparison
Distinct from Distichophyllum, Coryphyllia, Axosmilia and Bathmosmilia by the possible absence of endotheca (no ... [details]
Comparison
Like Bantamia Yabe and Eguchi, 1943, but has corallites that are embedded in a Palaeohelia-like coenenchyme. [details]
Comparison
Bathycoenia is a cerioid Cyathophora, without peritheca. [details]
Comparison
Like Thecopsammia but not septa not arranged in a Pourtalès plan. [details]
Comparison
The genus resembles Pamiroseris Melnikova, 1971 in having thick trabeculae, granules and a papillar columella, but ... [details]
Comparison
The genus is distinct from Pseudocoenia and Cyathophora by the special arrangement of the septal apparatus. Another ... [details]
Comparison
In comparison with genera that have been in Merulinidae before Budd et al. (2012), it does not appear to share the ... [details]
Comparison
Similar to Palocyathus (see that account). [details]
Comparison
Similar to Deltocyathus but reproducing by transverse division. [details]
Comparison
Said by the authors to resemble Goniocorella, but differing in its lateral branching, epitheca, lamellar columella, ... [details]
Comparison
See discussion under Hexasmiliopsis. [details]
Comparison
Similar to other genera with intratentacular budding, but producing a meandroid corallum. [details]
Comparison
Corallite structure is similar to that in Dermosmilia Koby, but corallites are thinner in diameters and corallum ... [details]
Comparison
Superficially resembles genus Margarastraea Volz (1896), e.g. M. klipsteini (Frech in Volz 1896:55,pl.5,fig.7) and ... [details]
Comparison
From solitary Protoheterastraea Wells, 1934 differs in calicular diameter of a higher size magnitude and all septa ... [details]
Comparison
The closest coral genus is Amphiastrea, as recently revised by Kolodziej (1995), but the major septa exhibit strong ... [details]
Comparison
Molecular and morphological data support Caulastraea, Mycedium, Oulophyllia and Pectinia as a monophyletic group ... [details]
Comparison
The genus is incomparable in its fibrous microstructure of septa and wall to other cerioid corals. [details]
Comparison
In cerioid colonies, the genus differs from the most close Ampakabastraea Alloiteau, 1958 with astraeoid colonies. [details]
Comparison
Opisthophyllum was synonymized with Cheilosmilia by Beauvais 1963 but this author changed her view in 1976, ... [details]
Comparison
The genus resembles Pamiroseris Melnikova and Cuifastraea Melnikova in thamnasterioid colony and corallites with ... [details]
Comparison
Other solitary microsolenid like Trocharaea or Trochoplegma do not grow downward. Genabacia is colonial. [details]
Comparison
From all Actinastrea-like genera differs in formation of peritheca, and in having trabeculae strongly ... [details]
Comparison
Like Astrangia, but corallum often massive with plocoid calice arrangement; coenosteum between corallites ... [details]
Comparison
Related to Apocladophyllia Morycowa and Roniewicz 1990, from which it differs in well accentuated bilateral ... [details]
Comparison
Beauvais distinguished her genus from Calamophylliopsis by the absence of rufles, from Cladophyllia by the weak ... [details]
Comparison
Intermediate between Rhizopsammia and Dendrophyllia in corallite integration. [details]
Comparison
The genus differs from cerioid Stylophyllum in septa developed in the form of ridges on the wall, and in tabular ... [details]
Comparison
Coelastrea is a well-supported clade. Two synapomorphies have been identified for this genus: limited coenosteum or ... [details]
Comparison
Similar to Caryophyllia but colonial, from a basal coenosteum. [details]
Comparison
Comparison with Microphyllia and Comophyllia is in progress [details]
Comparison
Placophyllia and Pleurophyllia have smaller calices, less septa and the septal cycles can be clearly deciphered. [details]
Comparison
The genus was discussed by Alloiteau (1957: 240 and 293-294) who pointed to similarity between genera Comophyllia ... [details]
Comparison
Similar in corallite structure to Eocomoseris Melnikova, 1993, from which differs in having collins. In colony ... [details]
Comparison
The main differences with Isastrea consist in size of trabecules and corallites (bigger in Complexastrea), the ... [details]
Comparison
Differs from Caryophyllia in having a polycyclic base and a papillose columella. [details]
Comparison
Differs from Goniocorella by having a fascicular columella, ridges costae, and large corallites. [details]
Comparison
Many confusions were made with Complexastrea. (see this genus) [details]
Comparison
Connectastrea was confused with Amphiastrea (Vaughan and Wells 1943) probably because the rejunenescence process ... [details]
Comparison
Differs from Turbinolia in lacking a columella and in having fewer external thecal pits (see Cairns, 1997: 22 for ... [details]
Comparison
The genus differs from other solitary genera with abundqant septa, Myriophyllum Cuif and Omphalophyllia Laube, ... [details]
Comparison
The corals of the family Conophylliidae Alloiteau , 1952 have septa arranged after decreasing pattern, resembling ... [details]
Comparison
Compared to Notocyathus and Peponocyathus by the original authors, but differs in not having pali arranged in ... [details]
Comparison
From Distichophyllia it differs in septal microstructure with the mid-septal zone straight or ondulated, not ... [details]
Comparison
In the microstructure of septa Coryphyllina is similar to Coryphyllia, from which it differs in differentiation of ... [details]
Comparison
From other genera of the family Reimaniphylliidae it differs in a strong monoaxial columella and presence of menianes. [details]
Comparison
The coral for its thick columella and regular shape of corallites resembles Craspedophyllia, but for its septal ... [details]
Comparison
The coral belong to genera of small calicular diameters (between 0.8-2.3 mm). Externally similar to Toechastraea ... [details]
Comparison
Like Caryophyllia but lacking pali. [details]
Comparison
Cryptosepta is distinguished from other phaceloid pachythecal corals such as Pachysolenia, Pachydendron and ... [details]
Comparison
Differs from Alveolocyathus in having an imperforate theca. [details]
Comparison
In the internal corallite structure and micromorphology of septa, Cuifastraea is similar to solitary Tropiphyllum ... [details]
Comparison
Similar to Coryphyllia, from which differs in septal apparatus differentiated into five size categories, and in the ... [details]
Comparison
Pleurophyllia is more bilateral, has lonsdaleoid septa, a thinner wall a different inner edge of the major septum. [details]
Comparison
In dimensions of corallites, styliform columella, anastomosis and micromorphology of septa, Curtoseris resembles ... [details]
Comparison
Pseudocoenia has longer septa a little more ornamented and vertically continuous radial elements. Bilaterocoenia ... [details]