WoRDSS banner


Deep-Sea source details

Cairns, S.D., R. Baron-Szabo, A.F. Budd, B. Lathuilière, E. Roniewicz, J. Stolarski & K.G. Johnson. (2010). Corallosphere.
169706
Cairns, S.D., R. Baron-Szabo, A.F. Budd, B. Lathuilière, E. Roniewicz, J. Stolarski & K.G. Johnson
2010
Corallosphere
Database
Basis for genus data entry for revision of the Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part F: Scleractinia.
RIS (EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
BibTex (BibDesk, LaTeX)
Date
action
by
2013-09-03 22:03:43Z
created
2022-05-17 05:25:17Z
changed
2023-06-16 15:09:19Z
changed

Alatotrochus Cairns, 1994 (additional source)
Aulocyathus Marenzeller, 1904 (additional source)
Bathelia Moseley, 1880 (basis of record)
Bathyactis Moseley, 1880 accepted as Fungiacyathus (Bathyactis) Moseley, 1880 (additional source)
Bourneotrochus Wells, 1984 (additional source)
Caryophyllia Lamarck, 1801 (additional source)
Caryophyllia (Acanthocyathus) Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Citharocyathus Alcock, 1902 accepted as Notocyathus Tenison-Woods, 1880 (basis of record)
Cladocoridae Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857 (basis of record)
Coenocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Coenosmilia Pourtalès, 1874 (additional source)
Concentrotheca Cairns, 1979 (additional source)
Conotrochus Seguenza, 1864 (additional source)
Crispatotrochus Tenison-Woods, 1878 (additional source)
Cryptotrochus Cairns, 1988 (additional source)
Cyathelia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849 (additional source)
Cyathoceras Moseley, 1880 accepted as Crispatotrochus Tenison-Woods, 1878 (basis of record)
Cyathotrochus Bourne, 1905 (additional source)
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Dasmosmilia Pourtalès, 1880 (additional source)
Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932 accepted as Peponocyathus Gravier, 1915 (additional source)
Deltocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Desmophyllum Ehrenberg, 1834 (additional source)
Dunocyathus Tenison-Woods, 1878 (additional source)
Endopachys Lonsdale, 1845 (additional source)
Ericiocyathus Cairns & Zibrowius, 1997 (additional source)
Fungiacyathus Sars, 1872 (additional source)
Goniocorella Yabe & Eguchi, 1932 (additional source)
Idiotrochus Wells, 1935 (additional source)
Kionotrochus Dennant, 1906 (additional source)
Labyrinthocyathus Cairns, 1979 (additional source)
Leptopenus Moseley, 1880 (additional source)
Letepsammia Yabe & Eguchi, 1932 (additional source)
Lochmaeotrochus Alcock, 1902 (additional source)
Lophelia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849 accepted as Desmophyllum Ehrenberg, 1834 (additional source)
Madrepora Linnaeus, 1758 (additional source)
Monohedotrochus Kitahara & Cairns, 2005 (basis of record)
Notocyathus Tenison-Woods, 1880 (additional source)
Oxysmilia Duchassaing, 1870 (additional source)
Paraconotrochus Cairns & Parker, 1992 (additional source)
Paracyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Peponocyathus Gravier, 1915 (additional source)
Phacelocyathus Cairns, 1979 (additional source)
Phyllangia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Platytrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Pleotrochus Cairns, 1997 (additional source)
Pourtalopsammia Cairns, 2001 (additional source)
Premocyathus Yabe & Eguchi, 1942 (additional source)
Rhizosmilia Cairns, 1978 (additional source)
Rhombopsammia Owens, 1986 (additional source)
Sabinotrochus Duncan, 1873 accepted as Stephanocyathus Seguenza, 1864 (basis of record)
Solenosmilia Duncan, 1873 (additional source)
Stephanocyathus Seguenza, 1864 (additional source)
Stephanocyathus (Acinocyathus) Wells, 1984 (basis of record)
Stephanocyathus (Odontocyathus) Moseley, 1880 (basis of record)
Stephanophyllia Michelin, 1841 (additional source)
Stephanotrochus Moseley, 1880 accepted as Stephanocyathus Seguenza, 1864 (basis of record)
Sympodangia Cairns & Zibrowius, 1997 (additional source)
Tethocyathus Kühn, 1933 (additional source)
Thalamophyllia Duchassaing, 1870 (additional source)
Thrypticotrochus Cairns, 1989 (additional source)
Trematotrochus Tenison-Woods, 1879 (additional source)
Tropidocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (additional source)
Vaughanella Gravier, 1915 (additional source)
Antarctica for Tropidocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
Australasia for Acropora Oken, 1815 
Australasia for Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
Australasia for Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932 
Australasia for Idiotrochus Wells, 1935 
Australasia for Peponocyathus Gravier, 1915 
Australasia for Platytrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
Australasia for Trematotrochus Tenison-Woods, 1879 
Caribbean Sea for Acropora Oken, 1815 
Caribbean Sea for Acropora Oken, 1815 
Central America for Acropora Oken, 1815 
Central Europe for Acropora Oken, 1815 
Central Europe for Bathycyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
Central Europe for Leptocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1850 † 
Central Europe for Notocyathus Tenison-Woods, 1880 
Central Europe for Parasmilia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 † 
Central Europe for Thecocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 † 
Central Pacific Ocean for Acropora Oken, 1815 
Central Pacific Ocean for Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
East Asia for Acropora Oken, 1815 
East Asia for Alatotrochus Cairns, 1994 
East Asia for Cyathotrochus Bourne, 1905 
East Asia for Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
East Asia for Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932 
East Asia for Peponocyathus Gravier, 1915 
East Asia for Tropidocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
East Europe for Acropora Oken, 1815 
East Europe for Ceratotrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
East Europe for Parasmilia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 † 
East Europe for Tethocyathus Kühn, 1933 
East Pacific for Acropora Oken, 1815 
East Pacific for Bathycyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
Indian Ocean for Acropora Oken, 1815 
Indian Ocean for Cyathotrochus Bourne, 1905 
Indian Ocean for Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
Indian Ocean for Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932 
Indian Ocean for Thrypticotrochus Cairns, 1989 
Indian Ocean for Tropidocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
Melanesia for Acropora Oken, 1815 
Melanesia for Cyathotrochus Bourne, 1905 
Melanesia for Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
Melanesia for Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932 
Micronesia for Acropora Oken, 1815 
Micronesia for Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
Micronesia for Notocyathus Tenison-Woods, 1880 
North Africa for Acropora Oken, 1815 
North Africa for Ceratotrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
North Africa for Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
North Africa for Parasmilia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 † 
North America for Acropora Oken, 1815 
North America for Bathycyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
North America for Parasmilia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 † 
North America for Platytrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
Polynesia for Acropora Oken, 1815 
Polynesia for Cyathotrochus Bourne, 1905 
Polynesia for Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
South America for Acropora Oken, 1815 
South Asia for Acropora Oken, 1815 
South Asia for Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
South Asia for Leptocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1850 † 
South Asia for Tropidocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
South East Asia for Acropora Oken, 1815 
South East Asia for Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
South East Asia for Thecocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 † 
South Europe for Acropora Oken, 1815 
South Europe for Ceratotrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
South Europe for Leptocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1850 † 
South Europe for Thecocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 † 
Sub-Saharan Africa for Acropora Oken, 1815 
Sub-Saharan Africa for Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
West Asia for Acropora Oken, 1815 
West Asia for Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
West Atlantic for Acropora Oken, 1815 
West Atlantic for Cryptotrochus Cairns, 1988 
West Atlantic for Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932 
West Atlantic for Leptocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1850 † 
West Atlantic for Peponocyathus Gravier, 1915 
West Atlantic for Trematotrochus Tenison-Woods, 1879 
West Europe for Acropora Oken, 1815 
West Europe for Ceratotrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
West Europe for Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932 
West Europe for Peponocyathus Gravier, 1915 
West Europe for Thecocyathus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 † 
West Indian Ocean for Acropora Oken, 1815 
West Indian Ocean for Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
West Pacific for Acropora Oken, 1815 
West Pacific for Alatotrochus Cairns, 1994 
West Pacific for Cryptotrochus Cairns, 1988 
West Pacific for Cyathotrochus Bourne, 1905 
West Pacific for Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
West Pacific for Deltocyathoides Yabe & Eguchi, 1932 
West Pacific for Dunocyathus Tenison-Woods, 1878 
West Pacific for Idiotrochus Wells, 1935 
West Pacific for Kionotrochus Dennant, 1906 
West Pacific for Notocyathus Tenison-Woods, 1880 
West Pacific for Peponocyathus Gravier, 1915 
West Pacific for Platytrochus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 
West Pacific for Pleotrochus Cairns, 1997 
West Pacific for Thrypticotrochus Cairns, 1989 
West Pacific for Trematotrochus Tenison-Woods, 1879 
Syntype NHMUK, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Spain, 1..., identified as Solenosmilia variabilis Duncan, 1873
Holotype NHMUK, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Portugal..., identified as Sabinotrochus apertus Duncan, 1873
Syntype NHMW, verbatimGeounit Pliocene: Sicily, It..., identified as Conotrochus typus Seguenza, 1864
Lectotype MCZ, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Florida,..., identified as Thecopsammia tintinnabulum Pourtalès, 1868
Holotype , verbatimGeounit Recent: Mediterranea..., identified as Madrepora oculata Linnaeus, 1758
Holotype MNHN, verbatimGeounit Unknown (probably Me..., identified as Coenocyathus cylindricus Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
Syntype NHMUK, verbatimGeounit Recent; off Rio de l..., identified as Bathelia candida Moseley, 1880
Holotype MNHN, verbatimGeounit Recent: Martinique, ..., identified as Phyllangia americana Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849
Holotype MOM, verbatimGeounit Gulf of Gascogne, 43..., identified as Bathytrochus hexagonus Gravier, 1915
Syntype MCZ, verbatimGeounit Recent: Strait of Fl..., identified as Amphihelia rostrata Pourtalès, 1878
Syntype MOM, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Newfound..., identified as Caryophyllia margaritata Jourdan, 1895
Unknown type NHMW, verbatimGeounit Pleistocene: Messina..., identified as Stephanocyathus elegans Seguenza, 1864
Holotype , verbatimGeounit Recent; off Havana, ..., identified as Anthemiphyllia patera Pourtalès, 1878
Syntype NHMUK 1880.11.25.156-157, verbatimGeounit Recent: Philippines ..., identified as Stephanophyllia formosissima Moseley, 1876
Lectotype NHMUK 1880.11.25.55, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Recife, ..., identified as Ceratotrochus diadema Moseley, 1876
Lectotype NHMUK 1880.11.25.59, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Rio de l..., identified as Cyathoceras cornu Moseley, 1880
Syntype NHMUK 1939.7.20.430-431, verbatimGeounit Recent; off Cuba, 11..., identified as Trochopsammia infundibulum Pourtalès, 1878
Holotype MOVI 24049, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Brazil, ..., identified as Monohedotrochus capitolii Kitahara & Cairns, 2005
Syntype MCZ 2761, 5622, identified as Coenosmilia arbuscula Pourtalès, 1874
Syntype MCZ 2767, verbatimGeounit Recent; Strait of Fl..., identified as Fungia symmetrica Pourtalès, 1871
Holotype MCZ 2769, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Florida,..., identified as Platytrochus coronatus Pourtalès, 1867
Syntype MCZ 2772, 5609, verbatimGeounit Recent: Strait of Fl..., identified as Thecocyathus laevigatus Pourtalès, 1871
Holotype USNM 46812, verbatimGeounit Recent: Strait of Fl..., identified as Rhizosmilia gerdae Cairns, 1978
Holotype USNM 46871, verbatimGeounit Recent: northern Str..., identified as Labyrinthocyathus langae Cairns, 1979
Syntype MCZ 5442, 2752, verbatimGeounit off Florida, 220-229..., identified as Dendrophyllia cornucopia De Pourtalès, 1871
Holotype MCZ 5601, 2773 (39), verbatimGeounit off Florida Keys, 21..., identified as Thecopsammia socialis Pourtalès, 1868
Syntype TIUS 60747, verbatimGeounit Pleistocene: Ryukyu,..., identified as Premocyathus compressus Yabe & Eguchi, 1942
Syntype ZMA 700 and 814, verbatimGeounit Recent: Indonesia, 4..., identified as Lochmaeotrochus oculeus Alcock, 1902
Holotype USNM 72797, verbatimGeounit Recent; : 9 38’30”N,..., identified as Rhombopsammia squiresi Owens, 1986
Syntype NHMUK 80.11.25.158-159, verbatimGeounit Recent: southern Ind..., identified as Leptopenus discus Moseley, 1880
Holotype USNM 81901, verbatimGeounit Recent; Sulu Archipe..., identified as Thrypticotrochus multilobatus Cairns, 1989
Holotype USNM 97168, verbatimGeounit Recent: Sulu Sea, Ph..., identified as Ericiocyathus echinatus Cairns & Zibrowius, 1997
Holotype USNM 97308, verbatimGeounit Recent: Samar Sea, P..., identified as Sympodangia albatrossi Cairns & Zibrowius, 1997
Syntype NHM B626, verbatimGeounit Recent; Lofoten, Nor..., identified as Fungiacyathus fragilis Sars, 1872
Syntype ZMA Coel. 1185, verbatimGeounit Recent; Sulu Sea, 52..., identified as Citharocyathus conicus Alcock, 1902
Syntype NMV F41513, verbatimGeounit Recent: Great Barrie..., identified as Kionotrochus suteri Dennant, 1906
Holotype SAMA H520, verbatimGeounit Recent: off Tasmania..., identified as Paraconotrochus zeidleri Cairns & Parker, 1992
Syntype MOM Unknown, verbatimGeounit Recent: Azores, 650-..., identified as Peponocyathus variabilis Gravier, 1915
 Comparison

The genus forms a paraphyly on the morphological phylogeny. On the molecular tree, Acanthastrea possesses several ... [details]

 Comparison

Like Acanthogyra but columella absent and corallites are generally in a greater variety of integration types ... [details]

 Comparison

Axial corallites are also seen in some species of Isopora, but with supplementary or multiple axials, and in one ... [details]

 Comparison

In skeleton structure (confluent and regularly porous radial elements, synapticulae, endotheca) similar to ... [details]

 Comparison

Actinaraeopsis is similar to Actinaraea d’Orbigny in structural septal porosity and tabuloid endotheca. The ... [details]

 Comparison

The type material of the genus Actinastraeopsis Sikharulidze, 1977, as originally documented in Sikharulidze (1977, ... [details]

 Comparison

Material described from the Middle Jurassic of India (Patcham Fm, Jumara Dome) as Lophosmilia tenuicaulata ... [details]

 Comparison

From Astraeomorpha Reuss, 1854, the genus differs in 2-4 times larger diameters of trabeculae, pennular septal ... [details]

 Comparison

Like Floriastrea Turnsek but polyps in less varibale integration types (only cerioid) and circumoral budding ... [details]

 Comparison

Superficial resemblance of this genus to Oedalmia Cuif and Lupitschia Cuif (recte Thamnasteriamorpha Melnikova) was ... [details]

 Comparison

Differs from <i>Pleotrochus</i> in having edge crests and lacking pali. [details]

 Comparison

In cerioid type of colony, small corallites, styliform columella the genus is the most similar to Stephanastrea ... [details]

 Comparison

Like Archeosmilia, but strongly bilateral. [details]

 Comparison

From Stuoresimorpha Roniewicz, 1989 differs in open series and the presence of the septum–of-valley [details]

 Comparison

From Alpinophyllia Roniewicz and Stuoresimorpha Roniewicz differs in thamnasterioid type of colony and thin septa ... [details]

 Comparison

Differs from Laminocyathus in having a papillose columella. [details]

 Comparison

The genus seems to be very close of Isastrea. The ornamentation of septa with flattened granules could be a ... [details]

 Comparison

Oyonnaxastraea has a thicker wall and an axially thickened major septum but could range in the variability of ... [details]

 Comparison

From cerioid Pleurostylina de Fromentel, 1856 and Amphiastrea Etallon, 1859 differs in having wide dissepimentarium ... [details]

 Comparison

The genus is highly similar to Barremian-Aptian Rhipidomeandra Morycowa and Masse, 1998, family ... [details]

 Comparison

From other meandroid Triassic corals differs in short septa, lack of columella and mixed septal micromorphology ... [details]

 Comparison

In contrast to the original documentation by Alloiteau (1941, p. 31, pl. 11, fig. 4, pl. 12, figs 4-5), the genus ... [details]

 Comparison

Similar to Asterosmilia but budding daughter corallites from edge zone. [details]

 Comparison

Monotypic [details]

 Comparison

From Coccophyllum it differs in having septal spines arranged in a half-fan and dissepimental endotheca, while in ... [details]

 Comparison

Antiguastrea is morphologically most similar to Tarbellastraea; both genera are plocoid with extracalicular budding, ... [details]

 Comparison

Some morphological transitions can be considered with solitary forms – Rhipidogyra – and massive meandroid ... [details]

 Comparison

No similar corals are known up to now. [details]

 Comparison

Like Actinastrea, Astrocoenia and correlate genera but differing by to have parietal columella formed by trabecular ... [details]

 Comparison

Gregory has compared this genus with Thamnastraea from which it differs mainly by absence of columella. Gregory’s ... [details]

 Comparison

In the corallite structure, the genus is similar to phaceloid Archaeosmiliopsis Melnikova, 1975. In its shape and ... [details]

 Comparison

From related genus Archaeosmilia Melnikova differs in phaceloid growth form. [details]

 Comparison

From thamnasterioid, small-corallite genus Seriastraea Schaefer et Senowbari-Daryan, Astraeomorpha differs in ... [details]

 Comparison

Differs from Hoplangia in having entire axial edges of septa dentate. [details]

 Comparison

Astrea rotulosa has not been been placed on the molecular phylogeny, but it is most similar to A. devantieri. Each ... [details]

 Comparison

having thick, compact costosepta and a well-developed exothecal wall, the material figured from the Aptian of ... [details]

 Comparison

Wells, 1956 considered Mitrodendron as a senior synonym but Mitrodendron is generally considered as more clearly ... [details]

 Comparison

Similar to Conotrochus, but having residual parent fragment attached to base. [details]

 Comparison

Similar to Peponocyathus, but differs in having a rudimentary columella, and multiple paliform lobes per septum [details]

 Comparison

As suggested by the original description (Veron and Pichon, 1982: 138), it shares almost all characters with ... [details]

 Comparison

Three autapomorphies, all macromorphological traits, unambiguously define this monotypic genus: exclusively ... [details]

 Comparison

Like Fungiastrea, Pseudoseris, Polyastreopsis, Eugyropsis, Eugyra and Diplothecophyllia but differing by the ... [details]

 Comparison

Like Microphyllia, but differing by the columella and the closed valleys. Like Comophyllia but differing by the ... [details]

 Comparison

Distinct from Distichophyllum, Coryphyllia, Axosmilia and Bathmosmilia by the possible absence of endotheca (no ... [details]

 Comparison

Like Bantamia Yabe and Eguchi, 1943, but has corallites that are embedded in a Palaeohelia-like coenenchyme. [details]

 Comparison

Monotypic [details]

 Comparison

Bathycoenia is a cerioid Cyathophora, without peritheca. [details]

 Comparison

Like Thecopsammia but not septa not arranged in a Pourtalès plan. [details]

 Comparison

The genus resembles Pamiroseris Melnikova, 1971 in having thick trabeculae, granules and a papillar columella, but ... [details]

 Comparison

The genus is distinct from Pseudocoenia and Cyathophora by the special arrangement of the septal apparatus. Another ... [details]

 Comparison

In comparison with genera that have been in Merulinidae before Budd et al. (2012), it does not appear to share the ... [details]

 Comparison

Similar to Palocyathus (see that account). [details]

 Comparison

Similar to Deltocyathus but reproducing by transverse division. [details]

 Comparison

Said by the authors to resemble Goniocorella, but differing in its lateral branching, epitheca, lamellar columella, ... [details]

 Comparison

See discussion under Hexasmiliopsis. [details]

 Comparison

Similar to other genera with intratentacular budding, but producing a meandroid corallum. [details]

 Comparison

Corallite structure is similar to that in Dermosmilia Koby, but corallites are thinner in diameters and corallum ... [details]

 Comparison

Superficially resembles genus Margarastraea Volz (1896), e.g. M. klipsteini (Frech in Volz 1896:55,pl.5,fig.7) and ... [details]

 Comparison

From solitary Protoheterastraea Wells, 1934 differs in calicular diameter of a higher size magnitude and all septa ... [details]

 Comparison

The closest coral genus is Amphiastrea, as recently revised by Kolodziej (1995), but the major septa exhibit strong ... [details]

 Comparison

Molecular and morphological data support Caulastraea, Mycedium, Oulophyllia and Pectinia as a monophyletic group ... [details]

 Comparison

The genus is incomparable in its fibrous microstructure of septa and wall to other cerioid corals. [details]

 Comparison

In cerioid colonies, the genus differs from the most close Ampakabastraea Alloiteau, 1958 with astraeoid colonies. [details]

 Comparison

Opisthophyllum was synonymized with Cheilosmilia by Beauvais 1963 but this author changed her view in 1976, ... [details]

 Comparison

The genus resembles Pamiroseris Melnikova and Cuifastraea Melnikova in thamnasterioid colony and corallites with ... [details]

 Comparison

Other solitary microsolenid like Trocharaea or Trochoplegma do not grow downward. Genabacia is colonial. [details]

 Comparison

From all Actinastrea-like genera differs in formation of peritheca, and in having trabeculae strongly ... [details]

 Comparison

Like Astrangia, but corallum often massive with plocoid calice arrangement; coenosteum between corallites ... [details]

 Comparison

Related to Apocladophyllia Morycowa and Roniewicz 1990, from which it differs in well accentuated bilateral ... [details]

 Comparison

Beauvais distinguished her genus from Calamophylliopsis by the absence of rufles, from Cladophyllia by the weak ... [details]

 Comparison

Intermediate between Rhizopsammia and Dendrophyllia in corallite integration. [details]

 Comparison

The genus differs from cerioid Stylophyllum in septa developed in the form of ridges on the wall, and in tabular ... [details]

 Comparison

Coelastrea is a well-supported clade. Two synapomorphies have been identified for this genus: limited coenosteum or ... [details]

 Comparison

Similar to Caryophyllia but colonial, from a basal coenosteum. [details]

 Comparison

Comparison with Microphyllia and Comophyllia is in progress [details]

 Comparison

Placophyllia and Pleurophyllia have smaller calices, less septa and the septal cycles can be clearly deciphered. [details]

 Comparison

The genus was discussed by Alloiteau (1957: 240 and 293-294) who pointed to similarity between genera Comophyllia ... [details]

 Comparison

Similar in corallite structure to Eocomoseris Melnikova, 1993, from which differs in having collins. In colony ... [details]

 Comparison

The main differences with Isastrea consist in size of trabecules and corallites (bigger in Complexastrea), the ... [details]

 Comparison

Differs from Caryophyllia in having a polycyclic base and a papillose columella. [details]

 Comparison

Differs from Goniocorella by having a fascicular columella, ridges costae, and large corallites. [details]

 Comparison

Many confusions were made with Complexastrea. (see this genus) [details]

 Comparison

Connectastrea was confused with Amphiastrea (Vaughan and Wells 1943) probably because the rejunenescence process ... [details]

 Comparison

Differs from Turbinolia in lacking a columella and in having fewer external thecal pits (see Cairns, 1997: 22 for ... [details]

 Comparison

The genus differs from other solitary genera with abundqant septa, Myriophyllum Cuif and Omphalophyllia Laube, ... [details]

 Comparison

The corals of the family Conophylliidae Alloiteau , 1952 have septa arranged after decreasing pattern, resembling ... [details]

 Comparison

Compared to Notocyathus and Peponocyathus by the original authors, but differs in not having pali arranged in ... [details]

 Comparison

From Distichophyllia it differs in septal microstructure with the mid-septal zone straight or ondulated, not ... [details]

 Comparison

In the microstructure of septa Coryphyllina is similar to Coryphyllia, from which it differs in differentiation of ... [details]

 Comparison

From other genera of the family Reimaniphylliidae it differs in a strong monoaxial columella and presence of menianes. [details]

 Comparison

The coral for its thick columella and regular shape of corallites resembles Craspedophyllia, but for its septal ... [details]

 Comparison

The coral belong to genera of small calicular diameters (between 0.8-2.3 mm). Externally similar to Toechastraea ... [details]

 Comparison

Like Caryophyllia but lacking pali. [details]

 Comparison

Cryptosepta is distinguished from other phaceloid pachythecal corals such as Pachysolenia, Pachydendron and ... [details]

 Comparison

Differs from Alveolocyathus in having an imperforate theca. [details]

 Comparison

In the internal corallite structure and micromorphology of septa, Cuifastraea is similar to solitary Tropiphyllum ... [details]

 Comparison

Similar to Coryphyllia, from which differs in septal apparatus differentiated into five size categories, and in the ... [details]

 Comparison

Pleurophyllia is more bilateral, has lonsdaleoid septa, a thinner wall a different inner edge of the major septum. [details]

 Comparison

In dimensions of corallites, styliform columella, anastomosis and micromorphology of septa, Curtoseris resembles ... [details]

 Comparison

Pseudocoenia has longer septa a little more ornamented and vertically continuous radial elements. Bilaterocoenia ... [details]

INDEEP logo NHM logo NOC logo Soton logo WoRMS logo OBIS logo Plymouth University\'s Marine Institute logo
Website hosted & developed by VLIZ · contact: WoRDSS Team