Traits name details
original description
Koch, C.L. (1847). Den Verzeichnissen und Berichtigungen zu Deutschlands Crustaceen, Myriapoden und Arachniden und ein System der Myriapoden. [The lists and corrections to Germany's crustaceans, myriapods and arachnids and a system of the myriapods.]. <em>In: Panzer, G.W.F. & Herrich-Schäffer, A. (eds.), Kritische Revision der Insectenfaune Deutschlands.</em> 3: 1-272, pls. 1-10., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/33700094 page(s): 135 [details] 
additional source
Jawlowski, H. (1930). Uwagi o niektórych gatunkach rodzaju Leptoiulus Verh., wraz z opisemkilu nowych form z poludniowej Polski. Bemerkungen über einige Arten der Gattung Leptoiulus Verh., nebst Beschreibung einiger neuen Formen aus Süd-Polen. Annales Musei Zoologici Polonici, 9(3): 21-28. Warszawa page(s): 20 [details]
additional source
Koch, C. L. (1863). Die Myriapoden. Getreu nach der Natur abgebildet und beschrieben. Bd. 2. 1-112. Halle, available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11100142 page(s): 20; note: description of species [details]
additional source
Loomis, H. F. (1944). Millipeds principally collected by Professor V. E. Shelford in the eastern and southeastern United States. Psyche, 51(3-4): 166-177, available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/50930580 page(s): 175 [details]
additional source
Williams, S. R.; Hefner, R. A. (1928). The millipedes and centipedes of Ohio. Ohio State University Bulletin, 33(7): 93-146. Berkeley, California page(s): 112 [details]
status source
Hoffman, R. L. (1999). Checklist of the millipedes of North and Middle America. <em>Virginia Museum of Natural History, special publication.</em> 8: 1-584., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/63590410 page(s): 451; note:
Essentially the same commentary made above is applicable here, except that the description was based on females. Chamberlin & Hoffman (1958: 75) have already posited the identity of this name as a sen...
Essentially the same commentary made above is applicable here, except that the description was based on females. Chamberlin & Hoffman (1958: 75) have already posited the identity of this name as a senior synonym of inconstans. Like the preceeding, the animal is small enough to possibly the same as that currently called Brachydesmus superus, but Koch s drawings clearly show 19+1 body segments rather than 18+1.
[details]
| |