Scleractinia taxon details

Plesiastreidae Dai & Horng, 2009

1289758  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1289758)

  1. Biota
  2. Animalia (Kingdom)
  3. Cnidaria (Phylum)
  4. Anthozoa (Subphylum)
  5. Hexacorallia (Class)
  6. Scleractinia (Order)
  7. Vacatina (Suborder)
  8. Plesiastreidae (Family)
accepted
Family
Plesiastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (type by original designation)

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

  1. Genus Plesiastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
  2. Genus Plesiastraea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 accepted as Plesiastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848 (unaccepted > misspelling - incorrect subsequent spelling)
marine, fresh, terrestrial
Dai CF, Horng S (2009) Scleractinia fauna of Taiwan. II. The robust group. National Taiwan University, Taipei, pp. 1-162. [details]   
Status Benzoni et al. (2014) studied the other genera that were originally classified with this family (Blastomussa, Physogyra,...  
Status Benzoni et al. (2014) studied the other genera that were originally classified with this family (Blastomussa, Physogyra, Plerogyra). They argued that these three taxa should be placed in a separate new family. This would require more morphological analyses and therefore these genera remain in Incertae sedis.  [details]
Hoeksema, B. W.; Cairns, S. (2024). World List of Scleractinia. Plesiastreidae Dai & Horng, 2009. Accessed at: https://marinespecies.org/scleractinia/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1289758 on 2024-04-23
Date
action
by
2018-08-11 07:18:37Z
created
Hoeksema, Bert
2022-06-22 11:26:26Z
changed
Hoeksema, Bert
2023-12-09 16:57:16Z
changed
Hoeksema, Bert

original description Dai CF, Horng S (2009) Scleractinia fauna of Taiwan. II. The robust group. National Taiwan University, Taipei, pp. 1-162. [details]   
From editor or global species database
Additional information Benzoni et al. (2014) studied the other genera that were originally classified with this family (Blastomussa, Physogyra, Plerogyra). They argued that these three taxa should be placed in a separate new family. This would require more morphological analyses and therefore these genera remain in Incertae sedis.  [details]

Editor's comment Benzoni et al. (2014) studied the other genera that were originally classified with this family (Blastomussa, Physogyra, Plerogyra). They argued that these three taxa should be placed in a separate new family. This would require more morphological analyses and therefore these genera remain in Incertae sedis.  [details]

Status Benzoni et al. (2014) studied the other genera that were originally classified with this family (Blastomussa, Physogyra, Plerogyra). They argued that these three taxa should be placed in a separate new family. This would require more morphological analyses and therefore these genera remain in Incertae sedis.  [details]
To Genbank 

Website and databases developed and hosted by Flanders Marine Institute · Page generated on 2024-04-23 22:31:45+02:00 · Contact: Bert Hoeksema