Intro 
Species 
Specimens 
Distribution 
Checklist 
Sources 
Log in 

Porifera name details

Gellius luridus var. minor Topsent, 1928

1486622  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1486622)

 unaccepted > nomen nudum
Variety
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
Not documented
Nomenclature Topsent (1928) mentioned this combination on p.349 in his table of stations and their content of sponge specimens. In the...  
Nomenclature Topsent (1928) mentioned this combination on p.349 in his table of stations and their content of sponge specimens. In the main text (p.315) Topsent described a deviating smaller specimen of Gellius luridus with smaller spicules, but did not name it (he stated it was 'dénommable'). Since the station from which minor n.var. was mentioned is the same as the station of the deviating specimen (stat. 2210) it is quite likely Topsent initially meant the specimen to be named minor. It is likely a j.syn. of Gellius luridus.  [details]
de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Carballo, J.L.; Cárdenas, P.; Díaz, M.-C.; Dohrmann, M.; Downey, R.; Hajdu, E.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Kelly, M.; Klautau, M.; Manconi, R.; Morrow, C.C. Pisera, A.B.; Ríos, P.; Rützler, K.; Schönberg, C.; Vacelet, J.; van Soest, R.W.M. (2022). World Porifera Database. Gellius luridus var. minor Topsent, 1928. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/porifera/porifera.php?p=taxdetails&id=1486622 on 2022-12-09
Date
action
by
2021-03-01 11:13:17Z
created
2021-08-07 12:49:01Z
changed

basis of record Topsent, E. (1928). Spongiaires de l'Atlantique et de la Méditerranée provenant des croisières du Prince Albert ler de Monaco. <em>Résultats des campagnes scientifiques accomplies par le Prince Albert I. Monaco.</em> 74:1-376, pls I-XI.
page(s): Table, p. 349 [details]  OpenAccess publication 
From editor or global species database
Nomenclature Topsent (1928) mentioned this combination on p.349 in his table of stations and their content of sponge specimens. In the main text (p.315) Topsent described a deviating smaller specimen of Gellius luridus with smaller spicules, but did not name it (he stated it was 'dénommable'). Since the station from which minor n.var. was mentioned is the same as the station of the deviating specimen (stat. 2210) it is quite likely Topsent initially meant the specimen to be named minor. It is likely a j.syn. of Gellius luridus.  [details]


Website and databases developed and hosted by VLIZ · Page generated 2022-12-09 · contact: Nicole de Voogd