About | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Specimens | Distribution | Checklist | Stats | Log in

Polychaeta name details

Siphonostomum [auct. lapsus]

762219  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:762219)

 unaccepted (Spelling variant of Siphostoma Otto, later Siphonostoma Otto, 1821, introduced by Grube, 1840)
Genus

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

  1. Species Siphonostomum affine (Haswell, 1886) accepted as Flabelligera haswelli Salazar-Vallejo, 2012 (unaccepted > junior homonym, (superseded combination with incorrect genus spelling)
  2. Species Siphonostomum affine Leidy, 1855 accepted as Pherusa affinis (Leidy, 1855) (unaccepted > superseded combination)
  3. Species Siphonostomum grubei Webster & Benedict, 1887 accepted as Flabelligera grubei (Webster & Benedict, 1887) (superseded original combination with incorrect genus spelling)
  4. Species Siphonostomum laeve Stimpson, 1855 accepted as Semiodera laevis (Stimpson, 1855) (superseded original combination with incorrect genus spelling)
  5. Species Siphonostomum tenerum Grube, 1868 accepted as Semiodera tenera (Grube, 1868) (superseded original combination with incorrect genus spelling)
marine
recent only
(of Siphostoma Otto, 1820) Otto, Adolfus Guilielmus. (1820). De Sternaspide thalassemoideo et Siphostomate diplochaito vermibus duobus marinis. [Epistola Gratulatoria quam ad celebrandum diem laetissimum VI Marti MDCCCXX (etc, etc)]. <em>Vratislaviae.</em> pp.16, 2 plates. [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2021). World Polychaeta Database. Siphonostomum [auct. lapsus]. Accessed at: http://www.marinespecies.org/polychaeta/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=762219 on 2024-04-24
Date
action
by
2014-05-20 23:24:02Z
created
2021-05-20 02:44:12Z
changed

original description  (of Siphostoma Otto, 1820) Otto, Adolfus Guilielmus. (1820). De Sternaspide thalassemoideo et Siphostomate diplochaito vermibus duobus marinis. [Epistola Gratulatoria quam ad celebrandum diem laetissimum VI Marti MDCCCXX (etc, etc)]. <em>Vratislaviae.</em> pp.16, 2 plates. [details]  OpenAccess publication 

basis of record Grube, A.E. (1840). Actinien, Echinodermen und Würmer des Adriatischen- und Mittelmeers nach eigenen Sammlungen beschrieben. <em>Königsberg: J.H. Bon.</em> 92 pp., 12 figs., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/10662919
page(s): 68 ; note: Grube used his own 'Siphonostomum' spelling for the genus of Otto (1820, 1821)  [details]   

additional source Haswell, William A. (1892). Observations on the Chloraemidae, with special reference to certain Australian forms. <em>Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales (Second Series).</em> 6: 329-356, plates XXVI-XXVIII., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/6561410
page(s): 329; note: in a footnote Haswell acknowledges his Siphonostoma affine is a junior homonym. However, Haswell here uses Grube's misspelling of 'Siphonostomum' as the genus name, for his own taxon and others. [details]  OpenAccess publication 
From editor or global species database
Spelling There is no doubt that Grube was using the genus Siphonostoma Otto, 1821, however, Grube named a new taxon as Siphonostomum papillosum and in the process he changed Otto's (1821) Siphonostoma (first introduced as Siphostoma Otto, 1820) to Siphonostomum, for unknown reasons. It may have been a simple lapsus, as Grube used the heading of "Siphonostomum Otto", so never intended to introduce a new genus. 'Stoma' is a correct transliteration from a neuter Greek noun, but 'stomum' is also widely used as a neuter noun and Grube may have been more familiar with that spelling.  [details]