Foraminifera name details
Agerina Farinacci, 1991 †
1037368 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1037368)
unaccepted (Nomen novum in Turvey (2003) Junior homonym of Agerina Tjernvik, 1956)
Genus
Vidalina martana Farinacci, 1959 † accepted as Agerina martana (Farinacci, 1959) † accepted as Agerella martana (Farinacci, 1959) † accepted as Ophthalmidium martanum (Farinacci, 1959) † (type by original designation)
- Species Agerina martana (Farinacci, 1959) † accepted as Agerella martana (Farinacci, 1959) † accepted as Ophthalmidium martanum (Farinacci, 1959) † (Unaccepted genus)
- Species Agerina martana (Farinacci, 1959) em. Farinacci, 1991 † accepted as Ophthalmidium martanum (Farinacci, 1959) †
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
fossil only
feminine
Farinacci, A. (1991). Emendation of Vidalina Schlumberger and the new genus Agerina (Foraminifera). <em>Paleopelagos.</em> 1: 5-16. [details]
Note The original description of Vidalina martana...
Type species The original description of Vidalina martana by Farinacci (1959) is not valid, firstly because no type specimen was determined and, secondly, because the proposed reconstruction of the species
does not match the specimens illustrated. Furthermore, Farinacci’s (1959) material is probably polyspecific and even polygeneric (see also Wernli, 1972).
[details]
does not match the specimens illustrated. Furthermore, Farinacci’s (1959) material is probably polyspecific and even polygeneric (see also Wernli, 1972).
[details]
Hayward, B.W.; Le Coze, F.; Vachard, D.; Gross, O. (2024). World Foraminifera Database. Agerina Farinacci, 1991 †. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/foraminifera/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1037368 on 2024-03-28
Date
action
by
original description
Farinacci, A. (1991). Emendation of Vidalina Schlumberger and the new genus Agerina (Foraminifera). <em>Paleopelagos.</em> 1: 5-16. [details]
From editor or global species database
Type species The original description of Vidalina martana by Farinacci (1959) is not valid, firstly because no type specimen was determined and, secondly, because the proposed reconstruction of the speciesdoes not match the specimens illustrated. Furthermore, Farinacci’s (1959) material is probably polyspecific and even polygeneric (see also Wernli, 1972).
[details]