| Introduction | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Taxon match | | Checklist | | Literature | | Stats | | Photogallery | | OBIS Vocab | | Log in |
CaRMS taxon detailsDipolydora Verrill, 1881
129611 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:129611)
accepted
Genus
Polydora concharum Verrill, 1879 accepted as Dipolydora concharum (Verrill, 1879) (type by original designation)
marine,
recent only
Verrill, A.E. (1881). New England Annelida. Part I. Historical sketch, with annotated lists of the species hitherto recorded. <em>Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences.</em> 4: 285-324., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7476851
page(s): 320 [details]
Taxonomy Dipolydora was introduced by Verrill (1881:320 in a footnote) for his Polydora concharum. The stated differences from...
Taxonomy Dipolydora was introduced by Verrill (1881:320 in a footnote) for his Polydora concharum. The stated differences from Polydora are not significant today, apart from the comments on the pygidium. [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2025). World Polychaeta Database. Dipolydora Verrill, 1881. Accessed through: Nozères, C., Kennedy, M.K. (Eds.) (2025) Canadian Register of Marine Species at: https://marinespecies.org/carms/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=129611 on 2025-05-07
Nozères, C., Kennedy, M.K. (Eds.) (2025). Canadian Register of Marine Species. Dipolydora Verrill, 1881. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/CaRMS/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=129611 on 2025-05-07
Date action by
original description
Verrill, A.E. (1881). New England Annelida. Part I. Historical sketch, with annotated lists of the species hitherto recorded. <em>Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences.</em> 4: 285-324., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7476851
page(s): 320 [details] additional source Fauchald, K. (1977). The polychaete worms, definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. <em>Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County: Los Angeles, CA (USA), Science Series.</em> 28:1-188., available online at http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/123110.pdf [details] additional source Bellan, G. (2001). Polychaeta, <i>in</i>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 214-231. (look up in IMIS) [details] status source Blake, J.A. 1996. Family Spionidae Grube, 1850. pages 81-223. IN: Blake, James A.; Hilbig, Brigitte; and Scott, Paul H. Taxonomic Atlas of the Benthic Fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and Western Santa Barbara Channel. 6 - The Annelida Part 3. Polychaeta: Orbiniidae to Cossuridae. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. Santa Barbara page(s): 181 [details] identification resource Radashevsky, Vasily I.; Pankova, Victoria V.; Malyar, Vasily V.; Carlton, James T. (2023). Boring can get you far: shell-boring Dipolydora from Temperate Northern Pacific, with emphasis on the global history of Dipolydora giardi (Mesnil, 1893) (Annelida: Spionidae). <em>Biological Invasions.</em> 25:741–772., available online at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10530-022-02941-0 page(s): 7 of 32; note: An identification key to nine shell-boring Dipolydora species from the Temperate Northern Pacific [details] Available for editors   Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Publication date Dipolydora was not published until 1881. Although Blake (1996:181) gives the date as 1879, Dipolydora is not mentioned in the 1879 (probably published 1880) paper he cites. [details]Synonymy Dipolydora is listed as an invalid synonym of Polydora in Fauchald (1977). Resurrected by Blake (1996) to contain a group of Polydora with hooded hooks with shafts without constriction and with notochaetae on chaetiger 1, thus subdividing the large genus Polydora. [details] Taxonomy Dipolydora was introduced by Verrill (1881:320 in a footnote) for his Polydora concharum. The stated differences from Polydora are not significant today, apart from the comments on the pygidium. [details] |
