 |
 |
WoRMS name detailsOphryotrocha puerilis siberti (McIntosh, 1885)
130030 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:130030)
unaccepted > superseded rank (rank upgrade to species based on molecular data)
Subspecies
Staurocephalus siberti McIntosh, 1885 · unaccepted (superseded original combination)
marine,
recent only
(of Staurocephalus siberti McIntosh, 1885) McIntosh, William Carmichael [as M'Intosh]. (1885). Notes from the St. Andrews Marine Laboratory (under the Fishery Board for Scotland). No. III. 1. On the ova of <i>Callionymus lyra</i>, L. 2. On a new British <i>Staurocephalus</i>. 3. On certain processes formed by <i>Cerapus</i> on <i>Tubularia indivisa</i>. 4. On structures resembling ova procured off the Forth. 5. On a female porpoise, with a note on its milk. <em>The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology.</em> Series 5. 16(96): 480-487, plate XIII., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/29996216
page(s): 482-484, plate XIII figs. 5-8 [details] 
Type locality contained in United Kingdom Exclusive Economic Zone
type locality contained in United Kingdom Exclusive Economic Zone [from synonym] [view taxon] [details]
Status Wiklund, Glover & Dahlgren (2009: 55) show O. puerilis puerilis and O. puerilis siberti are distinct molecularly. They...
Status Wiklund, Glover & Dahlgren (2009: 55) show O. puerilis puerilis and O. puerilis siberti are distinct molecularly. They state: "In our molecular analyses, the two subspecies differ from each other by 18% in COI, and based on this difference, they can be considered as two separate species" However, they do not create or use the name combination Ophryotrocha siberti" Subsequent usages at species level have not been found, until in 2022 in a non-taxonomic work Tuttle et al use Ophryotrocha siberti as a species-rank name, without comment. The GenBank accession stated is MZ820650 for the voucher material, and the name used there by the same authors is still (at June 2023) the subspecies rank name Ophryotrocha puerilis siberti. Later Kuhl, Bartolomaeus & Becker (2022) in another non-taxonomic work have four mentions of Ophryotrocha siberti as one of their study organisms, but no information on validity of the name, nothing on how the identification was established, and no mention of the species author or source of the name. [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2025). World Polychaeta Database. Ophryotrocha puerilis siberti (McIntosh, 1885). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=130030 on 2025-05-06
Date action by
Nomenclatureoriginal description
(of Staurocephalus siberti McIntosh, 1885) McIntosh, William Carmichael [as M'Intosh]. (1885). Notes from the St. Andrews Marine Laboratory (under the Fishery Board for Scotland). No. III. 1. On the ova of <i>Callionymus lyra</i>, L. 2. On a new British <i>Staurocephalus</i>. 3. On certain processes formed by <i>Cerapus</i> on <i>Tubularia indivisa</i>. 4. On structures resembling ova procured off the Forth. 5. On a female porpoise, with a note on its milk. <em>The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology.</em> Series 5. 16(96): 480-487, plate XIII., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/29996216 page(s): 482-484, plate XIII figs. 5-8 [details] new combination reference Bacci, G.; La Greca, M. (1953). Genetic and Morphological Evidence for Subspecific Differences between Naples and Plymouth Populations of Ophryotrocha puerilis. <em>Nature.</em> 171(4364), 1115-1115., available online at https://www.nature.com/articles/1711115a0 page(s): 1115; note: Usage of Ophryotrocha puerilis siberti McIntosh, a subspecies of O puerilis based on Staurocephalus siberti McIntosh [details] Available for editors  [request]Taxonomystatus source
Wiklund, H.; Glover, A.G.; Dahlgren, T.G. 2009. Three new species of Ophryotrocha (Annelida: Dorvilleidae) from a whale-fall in the North-East Atlantic. Zootaxa 2228: 43–56 page(s): 55; note: Quote: "In our molecular analyses, the two subspecies [puerilis & siberti] differ from each other by 18% in COI, and based on this difference, they can be considered as two separate species". However,... Quote: "In our molecular analyses, the two subspecies [puerilis & siberti] differ from each other by 18% in COI, and based on this difference, they can be considered as two separate species". However, the authors do not use the species name O. siberti.
status source Bacci, Guido; La Greca, Marcello. (1953). La differziazione intraspecifica di Ophryotrocha puerilis (Clap. et Meczn.) nel Mediterraneo e nel Atlantico (Ann. Polichaeta). <em>Bollettino di Zoologia.</em> 20(4): 93-98., available online at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/11250005309436881 [details] Available for editors [request]status source Fauvel, P. (1923). Polychètes errantes. Faune de France. <em>Librairie de la Faculte des Sciences. Paris.</em> 5: 1-488., available online at http://www.faunedefrance.org/ page(s): 450; note: Staurocephalus siberti McIntosh was included as a synonym of Ophryotrocha puerilis [details] Otheradditional source
Tuttle, Robert N.; Rouse, Greg W.; Castro-Falcón, Gabriel; Hughes, Chambers C.; Jensen, Paul R. (2022). Specialized Metabolite-Mediated Predation Defense in the Marine Actinobacterium <i>Salinispora</i>. <em>Applied and Environmental Microbiology.</em> 88(1): e01176-21., available online at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752147/
page(s): 9 of 11; note: Usage of Ophryotrocha siberti at species rank, but in a non-taxonomic work. The GenBank accession stated is MZ820650, and the name used there by the same authors is Ophryotrocha puerilis siberti. [details] additional source Kuhl, Sabrina; Bartolomaeus, Thomas; Beckers, Patrick. (2022). How Do Prostomial Sensory Organs Affect Brain Anatomy? Phylogenetic Implications in Eunicida (Annelida). <em>Journal of Marine Science and Engineering.</em> 10(11): 1707: 1-36., available online at https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10111707 note: four mentions of Ophryotrocha siberti, but no background on the identification and authority for the name use. [details] additional source Dauvin, J.-C.; Dewarumez, J.-M.; Gentil, F. (2003). Liste actualisée des espèces d'Annélides Polychètes présentes en Manche [An up to date list of polychaetous annelids from the English Channel]. <em>Cahiers de Biologie Marine.</em> 44(1): 67-95., available online at http://www.sb-roscoff.fr/sites/www.sb-roscoff.fr/files/documents/station-biologique-roscoff-dauvinal2003-3835.pdf [details] Available for editors [request]additional source Bellan, G. (2001). Polychaeta, <i>in</i>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 214-231. (look up in IMIS) note: checklist listing [details] additional source Muller, Y. (2004). Faune et flore du littoral du Nord, du Pas-de-Calais et de la Belgique: inventaire. [Coastal fauna and flora of the Nord, Pas-de-Calais and Belgium: inventory]. <em>Commission Régionale de Biologie Région Nord Pas-de-Calais: France.</em> 307 pp., available online at http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/145561.pdf [details] additional source Parenti, Umberto. (1961). Ophryotrocha puerilis siberti, O. hartmanni and O. baccii nelle acque di Roscoff. <em>Cahiers de Biologie Marine.</em> 2: 437-445. page(s): 444; note: record only [details] biology source Sella, Gabriella 1981. Genetic control of egg colour polymorphism in Ophryotrocha puerilis siberti. Atti della Societa Italiana di Scienze naturali e del Museo civico di Storia Naturale in Milano nat.Milano 122(1-2): 62-66. [details] biology source Sella, Gabriella 1982. Le fardeau génétique chez Ophryotrocha (Eunicidae, Polychaeta). II. La population d'Ophryotrocha puerlis siberti de Roscoff. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 23(2): 171-177. [details]  Present Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Status Wiklund, Glover & Dahlgren (2009: 55) show O. puerilis puerilis and O. puerilis siberti are distinct molecularly. They state: "In our molecular analyses, the two subspecies differ from each other by 18% in COI, and based on this difference, they can be considered as two separate species" However, they do not create or use the name combination Ophryotrocha siberti"Subsequent usages at species level have not been found, until in 2022 in a non-taxonomic work Tuttle et al use Ophryotrocha siberti as a species-rank name, without comment. The GenBank accession stated is MZ820650 for the voucher material, and the name used there by the same authors is still (at June 2023) the subspecies rank name Ophryotrocha puerilis siberti. Later Kuhl, Bartolomaeus & Becker (2022) in another non-taxonomic work have four mentions of Ophryotrocha siberti as one of their study organisms, but no information on validity of the name, nothing on how the identification was established, and no mention of the species author or source of the name. [details] |
