WoRMS name details

Acarnus (Acarnus) Gray, 1867

573741  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:573741)

 unaccepted (junior synonym)
Subgenus
Acarnus innominatus Gray, 1867 (type by original designation)

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Gray, J.E. (1867). Notes on the Arrangement of Sponges, with the Descriptions of some New Genera. <em>Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London.</em> 1867(2): 492-558, pls XXVII-XXVIII. [details]  OpenAccess publication 
de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Cárdenas, P.; Díaz, M.-C.; Dohrmann, M.; Downey, R.; Goodwin, C.; Hajdu, E.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Kelly, M.; Klautau, M.; Lim, S.C.; Manconi, R.; Morrow, C.; Pinheiro, U.; Pisera, A.B.; Ríos, P.; Rützler, K.; Schönberg, C.; Turner, T.; Vacelet, J.; van Soest, R.W.M.; Xavier, J. (2024). World Porifera Database. Acarnus (Acarnus) Gray, 1867. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=573741 on 2024-04-19
Date
action
by
2011-06-05 08:22:35Z
created

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Gray, J.E. (1867). Notes on the Arrangement of Sponges, with the Descriptions of some New Genera. <em>Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London.</em> 1867(2): 492-558, pls XXVII-XXVIII. [details]  OpenAccess publication 

new combination reference Van Soest, R.W.M. (1984). Marine sponges from Curaçao and other Caribbean localities. Part III. Poecilosclerida. <i>In</i>: Hummelinck, P.W. & Van der Steen, L.J. (Eds), Uitgaven van de Natuurwetenschappelijke Studiekring voor Suriname en de Nederlandse Antillen. No. 112. <i>Studies on the Fauna of Curaçao and other Caribbean Islands</i>. 66 (199): 1-167.
page(s): 60 [details]  OpenAccess publication 
From editor or global species database
Classification The subgenus was erected by Van Soest (1984: 60) to distinguish it from Acanthacarnus Lévi, 1952, erected as a genus by Lévi, but reduced to subgenus by Van Soest to acknowledge shared cladotylotes. Hooper (1986) demonstrated that the two subgenera were not monophyletic and thus they were abandoned in favour of a single diverse genus Acarnus[details]